Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NatWest CRA markers***Resolved***


fredsed
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This late payment marker business gets more bizarre by the day.

 

I sent the email to the CEO of NatWest-

as yet no reply

but to be honest I wasn’t expecting one

but it was worth a go.

 

I had a letter today from Noddle with the response from NatWest saying they won’t remove the data despite assurances from NatWest that they would delete this data.

 

I now have my latest Clear Score report at its showing a new NAtWest loan account with two missed payments in September and October this year!!!

 

all four CRA are showing a different record!!!

 

I have contacted the FOS and explained the situation and they say they will contact NatWest for an explanation as they seem unwilling to give one directly to me.

 

Do creditors ever report payments made against a CCJ to CRA’s?

(I can’t find anything on the web that suggest they do)

 

The CCJ was secured against the personal loan these markers relate to and an overdraft (they were in the same claim).

 

Would any payments made in lieu of the CCJ show on my credit file after the default dropped off my file?..

 

if yes this wouldn’t explain why Experian in showing it as 3 late payments dating back 70+ months!!

 

If it all wasn’t so stressful I might find it funny!

Link to post
Share on other sites

These late Payment markers refer to a Loan account that defaulted in September 2011 and was recorded as such. The default markers subsequently fell off as expected in September. It is now showing as a solitary 3 late payments maker on Noddle and Equifax but Experian is reporting it as a late payment dating back 72 months. I have started a thread for this here

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?482548-NatWest-CRA-markers&p=5078332#post5078332

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if a creditor is a liberty to place markers on your credit report that relate to a CCJ once the original default has dropped off the credit report?

 

My understanding from what I’ve read is that a creditor can only apply for a judgement if an account has been defaulted.

 

as the default will pre date the judgment

the judgement will remain on credit file until it 6th birthday.

 

However any payments made in respect of the judgement may show as payment toward the outstanding balance so will these payment still be recorded once the 6+ years from DF have elapsed?

 

Are payments made toward a CCJ in principle a new account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Payments to a Judgment are not connected to a default or CRAs

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally sorted (well almost),

I received an email yesterday from the FOS stating that NatWest have admitted that the markers are incorrect and that they will go ahead and deleted my file... YAY!!!

 

They have also offered me £100 compensation.

 

They say it can take up to 6 week to be cleared from my CF.

 

Considering the huge effort this has taken in time and sleepless nights I think 100 quid is a bit low but hey the most important thing is that these markers are removed, so I’m nearly there.

 

By the way the woman at the FOS who has been handling my case has been excellent and the whole experience became far less stressful once they were involved.

 

What is most frustrating is that it really shouldn’t have been this difficult and had the action promised in the 1st instance been taken this issue could have been resolved weeks ago!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done ..thread title amended.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi, I received a letter from my good friends NatWest (remediation team) re a Loan that defaulted sometime in 2012. Along with a defaulted overdraft it was secured by them with a CCJ. Unfortunately this happened before I discovered this site as a sar revealed they had no paper work for either but never mind the CCJ drops off my credit file later this year.

Right back to this letter. They state that as they didn't send me NOSIA statements for a year the owe me the princely sum of £34.44 in interest i shouldn't have been charged. This money they are very kindly going to use to pay down my dept. You've got to love em. So my question is, should they have added interest to this and should I do anything about it if so.

You good advice ill be most welcome as ever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id be very wary of this just in case I could restart the clock.

I dont think it does because its the lender re ajusting the debt, but you know the little cherubs do underhanded things.

Others will have more knowledge

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy,

I'm still a bit confused as to why after securing a judgment on the loan they now after 6 years would bother to check there records! I smell a rat.

 

I have had no end of issues with NatWest over the years.

I am paying the CCJ as the court ordered and as it drops off my credit file at the end of this year so I certainly don't wan't to do anything to re set the clock!

 

I've already had a fight with them last year over late payment markers that shouldn't have been on my credit file. But I've always followed your advice and it's worked for me so far.

 

I'm just sorry I didn't know about you guys when this all kicked off, from what I've read and discovered since there's a pretty good chance I could have defended this.

 

The CCJ and subsequent incorrect reporting of data has had a hugely detrimental effect on my life.

 

Can I claim interest on this money or am I best off leaving it well alone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all connected to the CCA2006 amendments..irrespective of whether the debt is a judgment or not..the creditor must issue a NOSIA....if not they are prevented from charging interest...hence the credit.

 

Given the fact that your debt is subject to a Judgment its irrelevant anyway...you cant claim interest...and there is nothing to reset...your making payments as per the judgment.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...