Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bequeathing a house in a Will which has non benificeries living in it.


Homer67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I intend to get professional legal advice on this as I'm making my Will, but I thought I'd test the water here first.

 

 

Please don't ask questions about the reasons for my wishes, it is a complex situation and I don't want to discuss it.

 

Circumstances:

 

I own my home outright, I am the sole owner. I bought the house outright with no mortagage and only my name is on the deeds.

 

My girlfriend moved in with me when I took possession and a few months later her son moved in as well with my agreement.

 

They are both named on the Council Tax and have bank accounts and mobile phone bills at the address, her son is an adult and out of full time education.

 

All other bills are in my name only and my partner makes no contribution to the bills nor has she contributed anything to the maintenance or improvement of the property over the 6 years we have been here.

 

If my partner does a food shop alone she uses my credit card account which is in my sole name but she has a card as 'Mrs Homer' so it's not actually in her own name.

 

As we are not married and according to information I have been given, my partner has no legal claim to the property at all upon my death.

 

I have checked and that does seem to be correct, despite some people saying common law rules apply, which I understand to be false.

 

I intend to write a Will which will bequeath the property, savings and goods to my sister and her children, with advice for the house to be sold.

 

My question is: Can my Executor give notice to my girlfriend and her son to move out so the property can be sold and do they have to comply?

 

My intention is to Will an amount of money from the sale of the property to my girlfriend's son to help him get on the housing ladder and the rest of it to go to my Sister's family.

 

Nothing will be bequeathed to my girlfriend, so she will have to make her own living arrangements (I am sure that will be with her son).

 

It doesn't sound too complex but I wondered if anyone had experience of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

 

I think you're definitely in lawyer territory with this.

 

 

 

I'm a bit confused about on the one hand you worry about your GF being given notice and then on the other say she'll make her own arrangements, could you clarify please?

 

 

I know that houses that aren't 'vacant possession' are harder to sell and not worth as much, so you'll need advice on that part I suspect.

 

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you going to use a solicitor to draft the Will? It's advisable in your circumstances. They can advise you whether either your gf or her son would be able to make any claim on the Estate. Personally for something so important I would never rely on what's written online or information given in CAG or any other forum.

 

The other thing to consider is whether you will allow gf to live there for a certain amount of time after your death before she has to move out. I was Executor on a Will that provided for this, similar situation to the one you describe, although the unmarried couple in my case were in their 80s. The solicitors put a clause in saying that on the death of the person who owned the house the unmarried partner was allowed to live there rent free (in this case for the rest of his life unless he married or moved out, but similar clauses are usually time-limited, live there for 12 months for example). Then the house "shall be sold forthwith" by the Executors and the proceeds used in the way specified in the Will.

 

There were various other provisions in the Will about the right to reside in the house being restricted to the named person (he couldn't let someone else move in with him) that he had to keep it in good repair and insure it, paying all the outgoings, and some other stuff. [He pre-deceased the owner of the house so in this case the clause never came into effect.]

 

 

It's a clause any solicitor should be able to draft for you, it's quite a common situation. Once the time limit was up the Executors could require the person to leave and enforce that through the courts. The solicitor drafting it can advise on the procedure.

 

 

Even if there were no clause like that the Executors couldn't evict gf immediately as they couldn't do anything until they got Probate, a couple of month's usually. So you might as well make it an express clause and time limit in the Will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

 

I think you're definitely in lawyer territory with this.

 

 

 

I'm a bit confused about on the one hand you worry about your GF being given notice and then on the other say she'll make her own arrangements, could you clarify please?

 

 

I know that houses that aren't 'vacant possession' are harder to sell and not worth as much, so you'll need advice on that part I suspect.

 

 

HB

 

 

What I meant is that once the Will is read and it is clear who is bequeathed what, she will need to be given notice to leave by the Executor and make her own arrangements for somewhere to live.

 

 

I presume her son will say come and stay with him but she has the option of stayng with her other children, point being is she is no longer entitled to live in my property and it must be sold and the proceeeds split as specified in the Will.

 

 

Does that help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you going to use a solicitor to draft the Will? It's advisable in your circumstances. They can advise you whether either your gf or her son would be able to make any claim on the Estate. Personally for something so important I would never rely on what's written online or information given in CAG or any other forum.

 

The other thing to consider is whether you will allow gf to live there for a certain amount of time after your death before she has to move out. I was Executor on a Will that provided for this, similar situation to the one you describe, although the unmarried couple in my case were in their 80s. The solicitors put a clause in saying that on the death of the person who owned the house the unmarried partner was allowed to live there rent free (in this case for the rest of his life unless he married or moved out, but similar clauses are usually time-limited, live there for 12 months for example). Then the house "shall be sold forthwith" by the Executors and the proceeds used in the way specified in the Will.

 

There were various other provisions in the Will about the right to reside in the house being restricted to the named person (he couldn't let someone else move in with him) that he had to keep it in good repair and insure it, paying all the outgoings, and some other stuff. [He pre-deceased the owner of the house so in this case the clause never came into effect.]

 

 

It's a clause any solicitor should be able to draft for you, it's quite a common situation. Once the time limit was up the Executors could require the person to leave and enforce that through the courts. The solicitor drafting it can advise on the procedure.

 

 

Even if there were no clause like that the Executors couldn't evict gf immediately as they couldn't do anything until they got Probate, a couple of month's usually. So you might as well make it an express clause and time limit in the Will.

 

 

Thanks very much, that's great information and exactly what I was looking for. I am definitely going to be consulting a solicitor to do this for me and I was just dipping my toe in here to see what the consensus was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant is that once the Will is read and it is clear who is bequeathed what, she will need to be given notice to leave by the Executor and make her own arrangements for somewhere to live.

 

Slight digression, but "the reading of the Will" - the family solicitor calling the family into the room and a hushed silence as the solicitor reads out your last wishes to gasps of surprise - is something film makers and authors love for its dramatic potential but it doesn't happen in real life! There is not, and never has been, a requirement to 'read the Will' in that way. After your death your Executors retrieve the Will from wherever you lodged it - often the Solicitor who drew it up for you - then let your beneficiaries know that something has been bequeathed to them. I notified the beneficiaries by email!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the girlfriend has been financially dependent on you, which it sounds very much like she has, there would be grounds for making a claim under the Inheritance Act. That isn't to say a claim would be successful, as each case is judged on its merits and to some extent, the depth of the claimant's pocket. These things are hideously expensive (£40K and up), and can drag on for years.

 

Proper legal advice from a trained solicitor is a must. Not one of these low cost will writing outfits or a DIY pack from WH Smiths. Spend £300 on good quality advice now, and save £100K in legal costs after you are gone.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to say that your partner, and her son, may well have a valid claim over your estate.

 

They will be eligible to make a claim under the Inheritance Act. There are 5 set classes of Claimants, the ones that are relevant to you are: Cohabitee (someone living as husband or wife with the deceased for at least 2 years immediately prior to death) and Anyone partly or wholly maintained by the deceased immediately before their death.

 

As you pay for both their lifestyles then it is likely that they can argue you maintained them, and so have a right to your estate.

 

That doesn't mean you can't make your will how you want to, but you are running the risk they will make a claim under the Inheritance Act that they should have been given more in your will than what you had provided for. Contested probate claims are quite expensive and it is likely only a judge will be able to say if they are definitely covered (although it looks like it) and the allowances you have made are sufficient or not.

 

I would always advise discussing this with your partner, because if they understand the reasons for your decisions, people may be more likely to respect your wishes, but it's entirely what is best for your situation.

 

I would ABSOLUTELY advise you go to a solicitor to have expert advise and to draw up the will, to minimize the likelihood of your estate being contested

Edited by Romancey23
Link to post
Share on other sites

Slight digression, but "the reading of the Will" - the family solicitor calling the family into the room and a hushed silence as the solicitor reads out your last wishes to gasps of surprise - is something film makers and authors love for its dramatic potential but it doesn't happen in real life! There is not, and never has been, a requirement to 'read the Will' in that way. After your death your Executors retrieve the Will from wherever you lodged it - often the Solicitor who drew it up for you - then let your beneficiaries know that something has been bequeathed to them. I notified the beneficiaries by email!.

 

 

Thanks, I remember that from my parent's will, we just collected it and read it out to ourselves and dealt with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the girlfriend has been financially dependent on you, which it sounds very much like she has, there would be grounds for making a claim under the Inheritance Act. That isn't to say a claim would be successful, as each case is judged on its merits and to some extent, the depth of the claimant's pocket. These things are hideously expensive (£40K and up), and can drag on for years.

 

Proper legal advice from a trained solicitor is a must. Not one of these low cost will writing outfits or a DIY pack from WH Smiths. Spend £300 on good quality advice now, and save £100K in legal costs after you are gone.

 

 

She is not financially dependent on me, she has a job and keeps her salary to herself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to say that your partner, and her son, may well have a valid claim over your estate.

 

They will be eligible to make a claim under the Inheritance Act. There are 5 set classes of Claimants, the ones that are relevant to you are: Cohabitee (someone living as husband or wife with the deceased for at least 2 years immediately prior to death) and Anyone partly or wholly maintained by the deceased immediately before their death.

 

As you pay for both their lifestyles then it is likely that they can argue you maintained them, and so have a right to your estate.

 

That doesn't mean you can't make your will how you want to, but you are running the risk they will make a claim under the Inheritance Act that they should have been given more in your will than what you had provided for. Contested probate claims are quite expensive and it is likely only a judge will be able to say if they are definitely covered (although it looks like it) and the allowances you have made are sufficient or not.

 

I would always advise discussing this with your partner, because if they understand the reasons for your decisions, people may be more likely to respect your wishes, but it's entirely what is best for your situation.

 

I would ABSOLUTELY advise you go to a solicitor to have expert advise and to draw up the will, to minimize the likelihood of your estate being contested

 

 

You have presumed I fund their lifestyles and that's not correct as I don't. They both work and keep their earnings for themselves.

 

 

Also the statement 'living together as husband and wife' seems to be common law that I have seen discredited everywhere, you're either Married, Divorced (without a financial settlement) or in a Civil Partnership, anything else is single and not liable for anyone else.

 

 

I think it's obvious why I do not want to discuss it with my partner and really have no need to as it is not her concern as we have not gained anything jointly financially since cohabitating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully agree with the posters who say discuss it with those concerned, those who are the main beneficiaries and those who might be expecting something but aren't getting it, when you make your Will. There's less chance of someone contesting the Will if there are no surprises in it when you die and and they understand why you did what they did. There's nothing a big surprise and their expectations being overturned to send people rushing to a solicitor to contest a Will. If there's going to be a row about it better it happens now than when you aren't here to explain.

 

Your point about rights of co-habitees is a good example of the risks of looking up law on the internet. In most areas of legal rights you are correct, co-habitees have few or no rights. But the Inheritance Act 1975 is an exception

 

https://www.buckles-law.co.uk/site/services_for_you/srvind_wills/inheritance_act_claims/ [there are dozens of similar websites] "Under intestacy provisions unmarried partners do not benefit at all and therefore usually have a good claim under this Act"

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have presumed I fund their lifestyles and that's not correct as I don't. They both work and keep their earnings for themselves.

 

 

Also the statement 'living together as husband and wife' seems to be common law that I have seen discredited everywhere, you're either Married, Divorced (without a financial settlement) or in a Civil Partnership, anything else is single and not liable for anyone else.

 

 

I think it's obvious why I do not want to discuss it with my partner and really have no need to as it is not her concern as we have not gained anything jointly financially since cohabitating.

 

I am actually legally trained (although i am in no way giving legal advice, only suggestions in what actions you may want to consider and contested probate is not the area i work in now, although i do have some knowledge) and I'm afraid i have to disagree and absolutely agree with Ethel Street, unmarried partners can and do make claims under the IA as long as you have lived together for at last 2 years. It is up to a judge in the end to decide if their claim is valid.

 

I also didn't intend to upset with suggesting you discuss this with the people involved, however i am a firm believer that someone should be aware of all the options and they can make a decision about what is best for their decision, and discussing their wishes is one of the first things i was taught about these things.

 

I can also confirm that providing a place to live rent and bill free can be considered a financial option and can be considered in an IA claim.

Again, i recommend you speak to a specialist about this

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...