Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bristow and sutor - OHs old CTAX debt and broken goods agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2306 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

my husband has a debt with our council and owes £1500

 

I let the bailiffs in as I didn't know my rights and they did A controlled goods agreement which I signed.

 

I missed a payment and we Spoke to council and they made us pay £700 and then £300 a month after I was pressured into making this and the £709 nearly skinned us and still haven't got back on track.

 

I have missed the £300 a month for 2 months now as we cannot afford it and bailiffs say no to a different arrangement .

 

I called them today and they said no and they will be doing a visit next week to gain entry.

 

Firstly what can I do?

I can't afford to pay the arrears of £600 and also the debt is in my husbands name only and it's me who has arranged it all and signed everything .. he doesn't even know.?

 

Shouldn't they have spoken to him and not me???

 

Also I am classed as a vulnerable person due to medical problems

 

Oh and it's my name on controllled agreement

 

Pleas help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi morgan

 

You will have to exercise a little patience here and wait for further advice..Im sure you will receive a response later.

 

I will keep an eye on your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband is listed on the controlled goods agreement I've just found it.

But the payments listed were lower then that I signed to?

 

Also the MacBook was bought by me and the car Is in my name

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry we have £1500 left owing I think may be £1200 I'll check

 

Listed is sofa , tv , foot stool, tv stand, MacBook thenjn conservatory is sofa, tv, printer , drawer units, microwave, lamp , mirror

 

Most of all this is now gone and changed to new due to having a sewerage leak through kitchen and living room and the insurance paying for it all to be replaced.

 

what they have listed is now not there except car, MacBook, tv in bedroom and printer.

I think I can prove all these in my name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right let's go back to the beginning when it all started'

 

How many Liability Orders did the Council have and from which years?

When did the Bailiffs first attend when you let them in?

Were these the goods he listed at this time?

You say some goods have been replaced - did you advise the Bailiff they had been damaged?

Do you know what fees the Bailiffs have charged?

Do you know how much you have paid so far and who to?

Do you know how much is still outstanding?

Are you up to date with this years CT?

 

Sorry for all the questions but it is better to have a fuller picture.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are not up to date

I think there's another owing under my husbands name..

don't even know if that is this year or not..

there's about 3 different council tax accounts.

 

They had one for me and I paid it off at £50 a week

( well there was two and I paid £25 each )

this continued till I stopped it as didn't even know if I had over paid.

 

Think baliffs attended in October 2016.

All the furniture listed and drawers and microwave are in the skip outside as we have nearly finished building work.

Well the insurance company have

 

. I didn't inform bristow and sutor.. should I do that??

To be honest we've been so upside down I didn't even think to

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. You have to inform them as once the agreement is signed, it becomes their property. If you throw them out without informing them, then it could lead to a bad situation> The kicker is, you were gonna throw them out anyway, so why not have them come and take them off your hands anyway :)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing more you can do till Tuesday then

Enjoy your bank holiday

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only one way to find out.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they just split the accounts / bills I can't even remember why?

 

Myself and husband had a break about ten years ago where he lived with his mum for 8 months but we have been down as a couple always

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I let the bailiffs in as I didn't know my rights and they did A controlled goods agreement which I signed.

 

I missed a payment and we spoke to council and they made us pay £700 and then £300 a month after I was pressured into making this and the £709 nearly skinned us and still haven't got back on track.

 

I have missed the £300 a month for 2 months now as we cannot afford it and bailiffs say no to a different arrangement. I called them today and they said no and they will be doing a visit next week to gain entry.

 

Firstly what can I do? I can't afford to pay the arrears of £600 and also the debt is in my husbands name only and it's me who has arranged it all and signed everything .. he doesn't even know.?

 

Shouldn't they have spoken to him and not me??? Also I am classed as a vulnerable person due to medical problems. Oh and it's my name on controllled agreement

 

The problem with council tax debts, is that unlike court fines and parking debts, a Liability Order only needs to name one member of the household even though the council tax debt itself is considered is joint debt.

 

On the matter of your vulnerability, you need to read item 2 of the regulations below:

 

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1894/regulation/14/made?view=plain

 

Who may enter into a controlled goods agreement

 

14.—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), a controlled goods agreement, as defined by paragraph 13(4) of Schedule 12, may only be entered into by an enforcement agent and—

 

(a)a debtor who is not a child;

 

(b)a person, aged 18 or over, authorised by the debtor to enter into a controlled goods agreement on the debtor’s behalf; or

 

©a person in apparent authority who is on the premises, where those premises are used (whether wholly or partly) to carry on a trade or business.

 

(2) The enforcement agent may not enter into a controlled goods agreement with the debtor or another person who it appears (or ought to appear) to the enforcement agent does not understand the effect of, and would therefore not be capable of entering into, such an agreement.

 

It may well be a good idea to speak with Bristow & Sutor on Tuesday and explain that the items listed on the Controlled Goods Agreement were destroyed a short while ago and if evidence if required, the agent can view the items in a skip on the driveway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just so morgan8080 is fully prepared, what is the likelihood of B & S trying to gain entry to seize list and remove the replacements for sale. and how many of them would be exempt anyway?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant remove the replacements unless theyre listed can they? The OP still has the items, albeit it in a skip. Surely if they renot actually broken, but still in working orde,r the bailiff should take them as thats what they deemed worthy of sale. Otherwise it would be like a vendetta against the OP.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case whether working or not, those are the items hopefully fully listed with serial numbers and accurate descriptions, and not chair 4 X dining, DVD Player Sony Black.............

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought if they arent specifically listed they arent allowed to take them

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought, so morgan8080 shows Busted & Stupor their items in the skip, and says no can come in no listed items inside, but offers them a payment plan that is affordable. Might work.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately if the items are listed, they're allowed to come in.

Otherwise everyone would just have junk items inside, and then tell a bailiff a few days later they're in the skip, while there are expensive new stuff inside.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Bristow and sutor

We broke the agreement after they set the payment too high

we skinted ourselves to pay £700 in one go.

 

They agreed to look at a different payment plan as the car is in my name and that was their leverage before

 

After some arguing and me proving car was in my name they agreed to Remove it from controlled goods agreement,

 

I sent message to them 20th July asking what my payments would be ,

they tried calling

I was on holiday

 

I got back to a letter last night saying he wanted goods or money in full.

I said there is nothing on the controlled goods agreement other than tv and bedside drawers and he hung up on me.

 

I called office and they won't discuss it

they said it's the enforcement agent who has to deal with it and I wasn't allowed to talk to a manager as they were fully trained to deal with it.

 

I proposed £80 a month payment which is more than they'd make removing some drawers and a lamp

 

no one will discuss it and the enforcement agent is very uncooperative and rude!!!

What on earth do I do

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is £1500 the £120 was a typing mistake

 

Please help?

 

Spoke to enforcement agent he doesn't believe that the sofas etc were ruined in flood and I have to provide proof

 

Spoke to council they say they can't say enforcement agent is doing anything wrong at present and can't intervene

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...