Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/? claimform - MBNA Card debt - statute barred


greenhill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have an ongoing issue with Wescot who are chasing an SB debt on behalf of Arrow Global.

 

 

Wescot have been chasing for the last 8 months even though the alleged debt has been SB for some time.

I have sent all the relevant letters even one refuting the claim that I had paid £1 towards the debt to a different dca around 4 years ago apparently restarting the clock.

This I have proved to be a" prove it" letter request postal order although they will not acknowledge the fact.

 

I sent a strongly worded letter telling them to leave me alone and yet again they are at me.

 

Wescot have just sent me a signed credit agreement (the first time I have seen it) which is fine

but I know the debt is unenforceable and they are ignoring the fact that I have not acknowledged or paid towards it in 8 years.

Stating that they have now proved their claim and for me to contact them to arrange payment.

 

This is becoming very annoying.

Is there a final letter I can send to them

and also report them to the relevant authorities to end this?

 

 

I really want to drive this home surely they cannot continue to harass me in this way?

Is it advisable to say "take me to court"?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice.

 

Cheers

 

GH

Link to post
Share on other sites

the issue of the £1 payment would ultimately have to be decided by a judge

 

 

you say you sent the prove it letter

do you mean the CCA request?

 

 

your down fall might be that you appear to be entering into pointless letter tennis

whilst you keep replying, they'll think one more letter will break you.

 

 

whats the debt all about please

 

 

Original Creditor type ETC ETC

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry yes it was a CCA request.

 

 

Transcom were the original dca and the CCA request was sent to them with a £1 postal order which was signed for on the date that Wescot now state that I had paid towards the debt.

 

 

I have all the previous communication with the numerous dca's assigned to this debt with proof of posting etc.

The CCA request clearly stated that the £1 was for admin reasons and not to be used against any alleged debt.

 

The original debt was for an MBNA CC.

 

I get your point with regard the letter tennis and will now just ignore all communication and await the next move as they have stated that they will recommence collection activity mid October.

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

GH

Link to post
Share on other sites

NCO , very low life

who were their clients?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very safe to ignore their idle threats, just hope they issue a claim form, then you can waste their money, and claim damages for the time spent dealing with these petulant children.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi guys,

 

Right this one isn't going away.

 

Had a letter from Drydensfaifax on behalf of Arrow Global. I ignored the first as it was the usual pay up etc. The latest one states that they WILL commence legal proceedings if they hear nothing by the 27th September.

 

I have an SB defence as I am able to prove that they allocated the statutory £1 postal order to this alleged debt. I had sent a CCA request on the 7th November 2011 with the £1 fee. I have recently received a statement from Arrow Global which clearly shows that on the 8th November 2011 they applied the £1 postal order to the debt and as such they believe that the £1 re-started the 6 year time limit.

 

I have stated the misuse of funds to them previously but as is their way they have chosen to ignore it. The alleged debt has been SB around 3 years to date and is "due" to be SB again on 8th November this year working from their dates.

 

Is it prudent to send the following:

 

1. Pre Action Letter (Any templates available?).

 

2. SB Letter (Again).

 

3. Proof of CCA Letter containing proof of posting and receipt for postal order (Again).

 

All in separate envelopes.

 

Obviously I will be defending any action taken but as a side note can I hit them with a counter claim? If so how would I go about it?

 

I have never admitted to the debt in writing or verbally (never spoke) and never paid a penny towards the debt.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Regards

 

GH

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO I'd tell them that you await their frivolous and vexatious claim which you will defend in full, and give them all of the dates you're free.

 

Have you lodged a complaint against them yet?

 

Have you told them it is SB?

 

It matters not, what they do with the £1 fee for the CCA, add it to the account and take it as payment for all they like, but it does NOT reset the clock, and if they're that stupid to try and hoodwink a judge that it does, then they're onto a hiding to nowhere!

 

In all seriousness though, I'd ignore them, you've sent them the SB letter, they're ignoring it, so start making complaints to all and sundry, including your local MP.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the advice is to do nothing. You have told them it is SB. If they want to waste money issuing a court claim, then let them. You would just acknowledge the claim online and submit an SB defence, the wording of which is on many CAG threads.

 

Once you have defended, they will then look into your case properly and are very unlikely to continue. It will then just remain stayed with nothing happening.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep ignore!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Morning,

 

Court letter has landed on the mat!

 

I will acknowledge online this afternoon once I get a chance. Is it wise to submit the defence at the same time? It is a straight forward statute barred defence the wording of which I am unsure at present. I would appreciate a link to a simple SB defence as I have seen so many different types I am unsure as to which one I should use. I really do not want to make an error with the wording.

 

Many thanks as always

 

GH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues.....please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Please read the following link and then copy and paste the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Hope I’ve done this correctly.

 

Name of the Claimant - Arrow Global

 

Date of issue – 13/10/2017

 

What is the claim for –

1. The claim is for the sum of £6500 in respect of monies owing by the defendant on a credit agreement held by the defendant with MBNA under account number **************** upon which the defendant failed to maintain payments.

2. A default notice was served upon the defendant and has not been complied with.

3. The balance owed was assigned from MBNA to the claimant, and the defendant has been notified of the assignment by letter.

 

What is the value of the claim? - 6500

 

Is the claim for - C.C

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? - Before 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - Debt Purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? - No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? - No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? - No

 

Why did you cease payments? - The financial crash lost house and everything else

What was the date of your last payment? - Unsure early 2008

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? - Not sure on this one? May have called them at the start. Definitely didn’t enter into a debt management plan though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

dx

 

here is the SB defence

yes you can file at the same time if you are 1000% sure its SB'd

 

The following defence is all you need if it is SB

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.

.

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

.

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC] or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

..

..ends..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX. This is definitely statute barred, they are however trying to say the £1 postal order sent nearly six years ago for the CCA request was payment towards the debt and as such re-started the 6 years. I have proof of everything so not overly concerned on this point.

 

Do I really need to start playing letter tennis with the CPR 31:14 request? This was statute barred 4 years ago. I think they are just hoping I ignore the court letter?

 

Thanks again

 

GH

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you don't have to send cpr/cca

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do I really need to start playing letter tennis with the CPR 31:14 request? This was statute barred 4 years ago. I think they are just hoping I ignore the court letter?

 

Thanks again

 

GH

 

I would.... then you have something to fall back on in your witness statement should they argue its not statute barred.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...