Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.   House or Flat? Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Again, points as above. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) Why serve a delapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease. I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to buy the freehold of the property. It's normal, whether it is a "normal" leaseholder or a repossession with a leasehold house, to claim this right of enfranchisement and sell the property with said rights attached and the purchase price of the freehold included in the final completion price. That's likely what the mortgage provider wished to do. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at? Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. So this is dealt with then. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.  You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension. You'd need a Deed of Variation for that. This may be done at the same time but the lease has already been extended once and that's all they have a right to. The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved. The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there. Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stress at work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3508 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Some advised needed if possible.

 

Basically I am extremely stressed at work. I work with Service Users and have been attacked twice this year. But I love my job and basically plod on.

 

The past year we have been low on staff to the point where I am the only female in the group. After the second attack on me a male co-worker said the trouble is that I am in a mans world, what do I expect.

 

I complained to my line manager, I said not to say anything just yet as I would like to see if the co-worker says anything else. So we agreed to keep this on my supervision notes.

 

Next day while in the office on my own, the co-worker verbally launches at me, shouting that I have complained he is sexist.

 

Then the next day in front of about ten people, he just shouted at me I was a snitch.

 

So I have written to the top of HR to tell them how stressed I am and that I am at the point of going on the sick - but something that I do not want to do. I have told them how stressful the job is and have asked them to consider giving me another job.

 

I have done my current job for 15 years now.

 

Am I right in thinking that by common law HR have a duty to reduce my stress and help me find another position within the company.

 

Any advice welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no actual 'law' which says that they should help you, but they would certainly be bordering on negligent if they do not, and may even face a Constructive Dismissal case or an allegation of discrimination if they do not work with you. There may even be a personal injury claim against them, so it is unwise to not take the matter seriously.

 

The problem at present is that you have not done anything 'formally'. Off the record chats and waiting to see what develops are noble thoughts, but you have basically asked the employer to do nothing. You now have to make this a formal grievance over the behaviour of your male colleague, and of the employer in disclosing your complaint to the person concerned and allowing the abuse to take place. Maybe even the lack of personal safety in being attacked by service users.

 

Once a grievance is recorded, the employer is duty bound to investigate and act on the findings appropriately. This should ideally involve a recognition that the colleague's behaviour is completely unacceptable, both in the event itself and afterwards (personally I believe the colleague should be suspended pending investigation/disciplinary) and support for the stress that you are under, with your duties changed accordingly. Ultimately you should be asked what your ideal outcome should be and if this involves the opportunity to consider alternative roles then so be it.

 

That is all down the line however, and for now, you should make the grievance a formal one since the behaviour of the colleague has worsened (and was witnessed by others). If you intend to go down the sick route then it is essential that this is backed by a medical opinion. If your thoughts turn to legal matters, then the employer has to be given the opportunity to correct the wrong and you should exhaust normal procedures before even thinking of leaving.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is vitally important that you document and record all goings on

 

WHEN (Date + Time)

WHAT

WHO (Person who did action and People that witnessed)

WHERE

HOW IT MADE YOU FEEL

 

Also look at your procedures for grievance, familiarize yourself.

IF not a union member ask for a witness at any grievance hearing.

In the hearing insist they take notes

Insist on reading the notes making sure they capture the important details of the meeting

ONLY sign them if they are accurate to what happened in the meeting. Request changes additions deletions if they are not accurate. If they will not make the changes "Sign Under Duress"

Request copies of the notes and make sure the request is made towards the end of the meeting and noted in the minutes including agreements on how they will be provided to you.

 

As there is an element of sex discrimination in your complaint, normal tribunal time limits on service do not apply. HOWEVER a tribunal must receive yoru complaint 1 day LESS than 3 months from the last related incident being complained about. Even if procedures are ongoing you can lodge an ET1 and then request a stay to have proceedings suspended while the procedures are exhausted.

 

HOPEFULLY though you will not need to go that far. If you did you would be advised to seek legal advice form a professional but bear in mind that time limit. Do not let that time limit come and go.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also send your grievance letter recorded delivery, keep proof postage AND signature of receipt.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you aware of jobs in other departments you could apply for? As this seems to be your preferred outcome.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Thanks for the replies and advice. There are other departments and roles that I can move to.

 

I would prefer to just move. I believe that after speaking a co worker today that, by sending in this letter to HR that the grievance procedure has started.

 

I know that my line manager knows about the letter, as I had to call him today about something and he answered the phone in a rude matter of "What do you want".

 

Last week I did say to my line manager that if he did not do anything that I will go to HR, he just told me to it. My manager and this co-worker are really good friends so I can see why he is not willing to do much to help me.

 

But we will see tomorrow Monday what will happen.

 

But thanks again for the replies. Helps me to know that I am doing the right thing now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Well the head of HR emailed saying as a matter of urgency this will be dealt with.

 

Today while on my holidays a heath and well being officer in HR called and asked for a meeting. While I am still on holiday.

 

Not sure what they want, can anyone shed any light on this one for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Well HR have finally called and after talking to them the grievance is in place. But they have moved me to another office which is over 40 miles away. They say that if I win the grievance I will have the choice to stay where I am or return to my office.

 

They say that the move is for my own safety.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Well after a meeting with my solicitor, basically he is saying that the company will close ranks on this grievance. I should really start to look for another job, as in time the company will be wanting rid of me. Which in a way I knew I was digging my own grave once the grievance went in.

 

So reality is, if they close ranks I have no chance at all in winning this. I have a meeting on Friday to see about my grievance, but I am the last person they want to speak to. They have already spoken to the person I am accusing and my manager. I did think that I would be first.

 

So in my mind I know that I have already lost, so when my meeting comes all I can do is go in to it, and hope that they believe me.

 

I have looked around on this site and many more and there is not one case I can find in a grievance producer that has won, so again not much hope there.

 

So there it is, hope that there might be a little bit of advice for me on here to say I am and was doing the right thing in sending the grievance.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, in my work place plenty grievances get upheld.they tend to be straightforward and not need much advice so you won't see them posted here. But it does happen!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that the grievance is still very important.

 

You are alleging bullying on the grounds of your sex. The employer has to be seen to investigate and whether staff close ranks or not, their response will be a matter of written record. They cannot afford to have it resurface without taking adequate steps early on. It may be a grievance now but would cost them a fortune to defend a potential ET claim later on.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmzzi

Am I right in thinking that you are in HR?

 

See my signature. Is there something I can help with?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Basically the investigation has started and my interview was brought forward. I told them everything that been happening to me. In fact I got so stressed and upset that I basically blurred out all the wrong doings that have been going on in our section.

They tried to say that was I not reading the actions of my co-worker wrong and I was being over sensitive, which i strongly said no to. Thats was the point when I felt I was trying to prove my point about the co-worker and what his whole attitude was like, stating names of people who could match what I was saying.

 

I came out feeling no further forward. I let them know that because I started the grievance I have basically shot myself in the foot and this has totally stressed me out. I know that the investigation should be on facts, feeling and probabilities. But some how I feel I have lost everything now. Told not to talk to anyone. Then this morning my manager phones me and tries to discuss and get questions out of me as he is seeing them next week.

 

A few co-workers say that I have done the right thing and that I have nothing to worry about as in saving my job, put I do not see it that way. Maybe a a good thing for them as this co-worker will be off their backs after what I have done.

 

Never mind, at least they know how much my health has been affected, but there eyebrows raised as soon as I mentioned ET to them.

 

Thanks for listening to my rants

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

 

I had put in a grievance against another co-worker for bullying and harassment.

 

 

the out come was 50 my way and 50 his way.

 

 

Whatever that meant.

 

 

while I was being questioned in this grievance I told the panel at the end that I had shot myself in the foot by bringing the grievance.

As the company does not want some one who makes trouble.

 

I was pressured by HR to bring the grievance and knew the moment it started it would lead to something else.

 

Well surprise surprise I am off to a disciplinary regarding a total different matter.

again being asked to have another meeting.

 

I am not so bothered as I have come to the conclusion that my career with this company is at an end.

 

 

Which I felt right from day one.

 

 

Never mind.

 

 

Just shows you are not allowed to have an opinion in this work place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...