Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Can a PPC (claimant) refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Kirby vacuum cleaner scam


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Now I don't expect for a second that any of you wise people will fall victim to this but I'm hoping that you will spread the word and maybe bear it in mind for any older relatives/friends etc.

You are at home one day when there is a knock at your door. You open it and someone says something like 'we are a new company in the area, would you like to enter into a free prize draw to win a car? All you have to do is give me your phone number to help build up our database'. If you agree and provide your phone number, you are given a small card with a picture of a car on the front.

A few days later you receive a phone call and the caller says something like 'you have won a free carpet clean/carpet shampoo in our prize draw'. If you agree to receive it, an appointment is made for a later date. If the appointment goes ahead as planned, you will realise that the free carpet clean is really just a chance for a salesman to demonstrate a Kirby vacuum cleaner to you for 2 hours or more, all the while criticising your current vacuum cleaner, asking if you are happy to live in filth, putting the fear of God into you about fires caused by dust build-up etc. If you unfortunately succumb to the high-pressure sales pitch, you will find yourself out of pocket to the tune of at least £1,500 and your statutory right to cancel will be denied.

Please remember this and tell anyone you think appropriate - more people knowing about this means fewer people falling victim and the company will be forced to either deal honestly or close down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been running since 1984 - and is hardly new!

 

Thr product itself is excellent - well engineered and does what it says on the tin, BUT having something that lasts 40 years is quite useful, you PAY for this longevity, and if every shopkeeper came to your door to demonstrate a product you can imagine it will cost you more tha if you bought something similar online.

 

ANYONE coming into your home (to sell) will do all they can to make yu buy - that's what salesmanship is all about. The sad fact is some folk cannot say no and can be easily manipulated - this isn't the fault of Kirby who do (or at least did, offer a good product).

 

As always, people need to take responsibilities for their actions - whether double glazing, tarmac laying, fitted bedrooms or vacuum cleaners. 'Just say no' is not difficult to say, neither is 'go away'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I beg to differ Buzby, there are vulnerable people who actually do not know how to say 'no' or really know what they are getting in to. I've seen elderly folk conned and what really makes me mad is they feel stupid or foolish! Not everyone had the mental capacity to understand what they are really signing for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And your solution is to ban sales calls for the weak-willed?

 

I'm not saying that people in these situations should not be protected in some way - but not after-the-event. Damning Kirby by special mention because some members of the community are unable to say 'no' is not going to happen, especially as commerce is not illegal. It would be up to family/social workers to look after those who are unable to take full responsibilities for their actions.

 

Expecting exceptions to be made because of THEIR inability to take responsibilities of ther action beggars belief. If the firm fails, they take the rap - but if the customer does, you expect the firm to take the blame for this too...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My landlord lives with his mum in a residential home and he is well aware of a lot of dodges, he has quite fun with some of them. Most of the residents in his building ask him to be present if 'salesmen' have tricked them into making an appointment, usually stating he has power of attourney on their funds. Soon sends them scurrying away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was speaking generally rather than being specific to Kirby, but yes, firms should absolutely be responsible for the conduct of their employees and commission-driven salesmen can pressurise into an unwanted sale.

 

Some salesmen are very good at targeting the vulnerable, and would not treat an 18 stone on-the-ball bloke the same as an elderly lady for example.

 

I did once have my carpets cleaned years ago by Kirby as a demonstration but I wasn't that impressed. The only thing that sticks in my memory was that the salesman was rather attractive and I spent a lovely afternoon having a good old flirt! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite agree that calling it a "[problem]" is misleading but their sales methods do leave something to be desired, especially when they cotton on to someone who doesn't know their rights.

 

My tale.

 

Kirby rep knocked on my door and offered me a demo with no obligation to buy, so I said ok.

 

3 hours later, they were still there and after pressure from them and my ex (wonder why she's my ex:)) I signed up for credit. Little did I know the credit was with The Associates at stupid rates.

 

The quoted sale price of the Kirby was £799 (after discount!) but the total including credit was nearly £1500.

 

I didn't get a cooling off period as they delivered the Kirby the next day and I (wrongly) assumed that I was stuck with it.

 

All I say is that if you get a visit from them, be strong. If you don't want one, say so. Don't let the pressure selling get to you. I used to be weak willed and I take full responsibility for my actions, but no more.

anyone comes to my door selling anything gets a short "No Thankyou"

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the scenario above as a sales call. The company state that the person has won a free carpet clean/shampoo. In any situation I don't agree with someone using emotional blackmail or scare tactics to sell a product or service.

 

I agree that if you invite sales people into your home you have to be careful and think in advance about what you want and what you are prepared to agree to. If you are easily intimadated or swayed then it's best that you don't agree to home sales calls wherever possible or have someone else with you at the time of the call. However, this was not an agreed sales call.

 

Not all vulnerable people have someone looking out for them on a daily basis. Not all of them have or need social workers. Just because you can be easily intimadated/frightened because of your age, etc does not mean you need a social worker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing I remember about the sales visit was their insistence of vacuuming my bed. Even after I told them my youngest was having an afternoon nap, the sales girl said that if she didn't do the bed demo, she wouldn't get paid (emotional blackmail methinks)

 

She then got a black cloth from her bag and put it over the hole where the dust bag would usually go, vacuumed the bed and showed me the result (not pretty).

 

What I didn't cotton on to was that once a dust bag is fitted, the amount of suction would be less due to dust clogging up the paper bag inside.

 

Having said all I have, it was a great vacuum and my ex still has it (over 10 years later)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bedroom scenario is the great one - it puts the cutomer on the back-foot, as this is quivkly followed by the photocopied page of what a X5000 magnified bed bug looks like. By showing you the 'dark' tissue that the Kirby deposits after sucking from your bed, you'd be hard pressed not to - but that's part of the technique.

 

I don;t do business on the doorstep, and never have. The Kirby technique is invariably to use referrals from friends - as it gets you the additional discounts. However it isn;t a [problem] (like pyramid selling) which will leave many high and dry.

 

As for their finance arrangements - pay cash (better still, buy off ebay!) but since you could put it on a credit card for cheaper, taking out their finance deal is silly, but no different to taking a similar arrangement when buying a car... it's just another decision to purchase.

 

Slick salesmanship is everywhere, from encyclopaedias to carpet cleaners the hapless consumer needs to keep their wits about them - and trust nobody. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

) I signed up for credit. Little did I know the credit was with The Associates at stupid rates.

 

So you signed up for credit without knowing the APR and your monthly repayments? :eek:

 

You might as well have left your wallet open and given him your cash card and PIN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scams can be doing the rounds years after they originally started.

We cant assume that every Cagger will be familiar with them.

The OP is in a position to know more,since their job deals with these things,and its reasonable to therefore assume that they posted this on the basis that it needed airing at this time.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I was under the impression that the Consumer Protection from Unfair Business Practices 2008,incorporates new legislation to address some of the issues here.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just what I was going to say, Martin! When some people say this is just a sales technique and that it's people's own fault, they seem to conveniently ignore that it is in fact a specified unfair term under both "false competition prize" AND "false competitions". Obtaining data under guise of entering people into a prize draw to then only pressurise them in booking a demo (which is NOT the same as having won a free clean/shampoo) is also dishonest, and I'd think a breach of the DPA if they're using the data for another purpose than the one to which the subject agreed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely:)

 

I have a copy of the regs here-I printed them off last year-theres lots of things in there which many people prob are not familiar with.

The examples that are given are good too-in explaining how they apply.

I remember the one about doorstep selling -and not being able to say things like "Burglaries in this area have trebled love...." in the case of someone trying to sell you a burglar alarm.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you agreed that if you are contacted out the blue and told 'you've won a prize', the problem is with the firm for offering, and no blame is attached the the consumer for believing it...?

 

What's next - legislation to prevent lying?

 

It's much easier to disbelieve everyone, is save a lot of time and on balance is probably better for you.

 

If rules are badly drafted - and lets face it a lot of consumer protection and other laws are, only a fool would believe it will actually protect HIM, as the enforcement will still depend on lining up the ducks at the various agencies that need to pay for the prosecution costs, and as we know - there's no money anywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Raymond can you not at least TRY to post constructively....

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ermmmm... yes?

 

If a company says: "you have won a prize", you have the absolute right to expect to be given a prize, not for someone to try to hard sell you stuff you didn't ask for in the first place.

 

Hardly rocket science.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's next - legislation to prevent lying?

 

Never in a million years.....it would mean politicians never being able to utter another sentence.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I WAS being very constructive.

 

My web rowser opens with an adver box telling me I have been selected out of XXXX hits to apply for this free game, utensil or software. Or are you both suggesting that I should believe them and accept their invitation? Or is it that face to face promises should be believed, and not those on the Internet?

 

As for Martin's politician's synicism - my MP (and MSP) are upstanding citizense, so marking out politicians as greater liars than salesmen/women (of which there are no doubt many more) does;nt hold water.

 

Being cautious isn't a gift - being a pillock and believing everything you are told most certainly IS - to the salesman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a world of difference between an ad on the Internet you can just pass by and a salesman parked in your living-room for 5 hours and seemingly not moving until you have given in. Even you must be able to realise that, surely?

 

Regardless of what you believe or not, Kirby are trying to circumvent consumer protection anyway. If they turn up uninvited at the doorstep and flog the product, the consumer is protected. If they get invited (albeit under false pretence) and flog the product, that protection is gone. It seems quite clear that they do know this with the fake prizegiving and appointment making that ensues, which is two-fold: misleading the consumer into thinking he is getting a prize and stripping him of his statutory protection in the subsequent transaction which may ensue.

 

Now why would any reputable company which stands by its product evne try to do that? :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now why would any reputable company which stands by its product evne try to do that

 

Or indeed any upstanding salesmen ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've clearly not had a Kirby salesman. Kirby are not the sellers.

 

This is an american company that are franchise-based (usually area/postcode). They sell to distributors, who sell to area organisers who then sell to the salesforce, who are all self employed, and buy their stock at a discount from the area distributor. Tupperware works in exaclty the same way.

 

Just as Tupperware won;t care about the selling techniques used, Kirby manke vacuum cleaners and sell them to national distributors on an exclusive basis.

 

As for the salesman 'cold calling' - when has this been illegal? If a customer buy's something he doesn't need - just how are you going to blame the seller for that? As for the 'free' offer - I was promised a free floor polish adaptor (worth £400) - but I had to buy the Kirby first (indeed, it would have been pointless as the polisher needed the Kirby to operate!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my mum had a bad fall earlier in the year I have taken to going round on the nights that my dad goes to play snooker.

 

Arriving their one evening about 8pm I noticed a car on their drive with the boot open and a couple of men/lads in their mid 20's at the door.

 

Apparently they were there to give a 'demonstration' . Mum said that they should of been there at 6.30 but had been delayed I took one look at their T-Shirts it had 'Kirby Cleaners' as a logo. I straight away said that they had no need of one as they already had a 'Vax' and if they were in need of carpets being cleaned then me and Mr Saintly would be more than happy to do it for them.

 

They wern't too happy about me turning up and talking mum out of her 'demonstration' but they left within a few minutes of me turning up .

Link to post
Share on other sites

However it isn;t a [problem] (like pyramid selling) which will leave many high and dry.

 

Unfortunately, I beg to differ. It most certainly is a [problem]; the dictionary definition of [problem] is an illegal plan for making money and telling a consumer that you want to enter their home for one thing when your real intention is another is a criminal offence by virtue of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. It IS leaving many high and dry - I am currently dealing with over 40 complaints, hence my wish to inform the general public as per my OP.

 

What's next - legislation to prevent lying?

This has been in place for a while now. See the Fraud Act 2006, more specifically fraud by making a false representation (i.e. lying).

 

If they turn up uninvited...the consumer is protected. If they get invited...that protection is gone.
.

Just to clarify, these Regulations changed in October 2008 - the Cancellation of Contracts Made in a Consumer's Home or Place of Work, etc Regulations 2008 give consumers a 7 day cancellation period when buying at home whether the visit was invited or uninvited.

 

FWIW, I agree with the comments re the Kirby being a quality product, there is no argument there. It is just the way that it is being sold to people in their own homes. I am just asking for businesses to be honest - if you want to sell something to someone, tell them that, don't tell them that you want to give them a prize and that there is no obligation just to get inside their home.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...