Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Drydens claimform - Capital One card debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everybody,

I am acting for my partner who had PPI added to his Capital One credit card account one month after he took on the credit card. He did not sign or tick a box to accept PPI.

 

He was quite clear to Capital One during the application process - he didn't want PPI. One month after he signed the agreement, Capital One telephoned him and asked him to have a direct debit.

 

He said yes to the direct debit. He always worked very long hours so did not notice until last year that Capital One had added PPI to his account the same day as that phone call. As soon as he noticed, he cancelled it. Capital One refused to refund the PPI payments.

 

We went to the FOS, whose adjudicator gave his decision that because my partner spoke to Capital One in that telephone conversation one month after opening the account, my partner "must have, on the balance of probabilities", agreed to taking out PPI.

 

This, despite the fact that my partner provided the copy original credit card agreement, (hard evidence), and Capital One only provided the standard blank telephone script.

 

We complained to the adjudicator and asked for an ombudsman to take on the case. The adjudicator wrote back explaining his reasons in full, and saying he wanted to "resolve the matter informally", and asked my partner again if he wanted to put it to an Ombudsman, or accept his "view" so as "not to delay matters further".

 

My partner has written back saying that he had already requested that the matter go to an Ombudsman and that he is contacting our local MP.

 

I personally believe that the FOS have agreed a quota with the credit card companies, as to how many consumers' claims they will let through (decide in favour of), and that they are now under so much pressure due to the number of claims they are processing, that they now wish to get rid of as many claims as possible, without looking at hard evidence.

 

I believe it will take interference from an MP to get a fair investigation and a fair decision from the FOS.

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

This is an update.

 

My MP intervened (turns out he hates Capital One).

 

The Ombudsman took over the investigation from the adjudicator, and decided in my partner's favour.

 

Debt written off.

 

Capital One behaving like little babies and being slow to provide correct information regarding exactly how they calculate the refund.

 

Our complaint has gone back to the Ombudsman to enforce the decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pleased to hear this has been resolved in your partner's favour.

 

 

We complained to the adjudicator and asked for an ombudsman to take on the case. The adjudicator wrote back explaining his reasons in full, and saying he wanted to "resolve the matter informally", and asked my partner again if he wanted to put it to an Ombudsman, or accept his "view" so as "not to delay matters further".

 

I was interested in seeing that the adjudicator had contacted you as above. This happened to my OH after an adjudicator found in favour of the bank. The ombudsman overturned the adjudicator's decision.

 

I understand there is quite a high turnover of staff at the FOS and wonder if poor first tier decisions are becoming a problem.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Citizen B

 

From my telephone contact with adjudicators,

I think they are out of their depth in ploughing through the murky world of lying credit card companies.

 

 

I would doubt that many of them have sufficient legal training to be fit for purpose.

I say this because I have worked with solicitors and barristers dealing with complex court cases,

and I believe it takes a good level of legal expertise to cut through the lies and get to the truth.

 

 

A few months ago I took up computer chess, and in a small way, (not pretending otherwise), it does help me to think long-term strategies.

 

 

All the best,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi Team,

 

It's a long time since I have posted. Hope you are all well.

 

May I have some advice please.

My partner had a PPI claim against Capital One.

The Ombudsman gave a decision in my partner's favour in May 2013

and ordered Capital One to do a hypothetical reconstruction of the credit card account,

remove the PPI premiums, interest and charges, and interest on the charges;

 

 

pay my partner the difference between the closing balance and what the closing balance would have been without the PPI;

pay my partner 8% interest on the account and 8% on the difference in the two balances;

and set out in writing to my partner how Capital One calculated the compensation.

 

Capital One refused to comply.

They 'sold' the account to Credit Solutions, Power2Contact, and now Cabot (all owned by Capital One) who are threatening legal action through Drydens Fairfax.

 

In August 2013 my partner wrote to the Ombudsman stating that Capital One had not complied with the their judgment,

and that we had calculated that Capital One owe my partner £2,000 net of the 'alleged' account balance.

He has never had a reply.

My partner has today received a letter from Drydens Fairfax.

 

 

My own instinct is to wait and see if they do take out an N1 against my partner,

and if they do, then we can respond to the claim enclosing a copy of the Ombudsman's Decision.

 

 

I will calculate what is owed to my partner up to date, and we will counterclaim.

 

We have not contacted Capital One in any way since the Ombudsman's Decision.

I would like to somehow mend my partner's credit record, as he doesn't owe them anything,

and they owe him, probably substantially more than £2,000 as another two years have passed since the Decision.

 

I would be very grateful to receive any advice on this situation.

 

Best wishes

AvengingAngel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this is interesting... You could hit them right here right now. Scan a few copies of the letter from the Ombudsman... Send emails to the following email addresses explaining the situation in full....

Theyd be stupid to go to court on this! But you need to inform them NOW! The Ombudsman made their decision clear.

 

[email protected] - CEO of Cabot Group

[email protected] - CEO of Drydens Fairfax

[email protected] - CEO Cap One UK

[email protected] - Compliance Cap One UK

[email protected] - Compliance - Cabot

[email protected] - Compliance - Drydens Fairfax

 

Informing DF and Cabot about this WILL Stop them from going for legal action and hopefully hand back off to Cap One for them to deal with. Then Cap One will have to abide by the decision of the Ombudsman.

 

If they have completely ignored you then I suspect that they may offer something on top of it.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capital One refused to comply. They 'sold' the account to Credit Solutions, Power2Contact, and now Cabot (all owned by Capital One) who are threatening legal action through Drydens Fairfax.

 

None are owned by cap one FYI

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could hit them right here right now.

Sounds good to me. Thank you so much for the email addresses. I will follow your advice.

 

 

Thanks again. I will let everybody know the outcome.

Best wishes,

AAngel

 

Oops, it should have had a question mark after it - regarding the other companies being owned by Cap One. Thanks.

AAngel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do keep me posted, Im interested in this case with you. It seems like Cap One have been pretty ignorant. Any claim made by the DCA and Sols will be derailed instantly anyway. But Before you get to that stage, manage it now, Its a LOT more easier to do so.

 

If anyone refuses to play ball, then you start legal action yourself with a Letter Before Action stating your requirements and 7 - 14 days.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

Ankit Pande, of the Executive Office, Capital One, replied,

saying that they had complied with the Ombudsman's decision,

taken some money off, and that my partner owes the outstanding balance.

 

have recalculated the redress amount again and confirm that no further redress is due.

they don't know where we get our much larger figure from, that they owe my partner.

 

They also say go back to the Ombudsman if we are not satisfied.

they sold the debt to Cabot so they have no connection with the debt anymore.

 

We had a holding email from Drydens.

 

We have had no response at all from Cabot.

 

The 14 +2 day deadline for replying was 30.12.2015.

 

Capital One say that the few hundred pounds they refunded my partner is correct,

but they did not refund the masses of £12.00 payment charges that should not have been applied,

and which the Ombudsman ordered be refunded.

 

I have calculated the PPI using an excel PPI calculator.

 

Is there one attached to this site please, so I can do my calculations again, before we take further action?

 

 

As ever, I would appreciate thoughts as to what next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

attach your spread sheet please

 

 

upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have uploaded a PDF of the calculator I was using. I have also now found a PPI FOS calculator on this site.

 

I get confused as to when to apply interest of 8% or interest of what Cap One was charging, ie 30.34%.

 

All help appreciated.

Thank you.

AA

 

PS, I stopped calculations as at the judgment date,

but I would imagine my other half is owed payments up to the date they pay?

PPI Calculator_03.01.16.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

ideally you should use the running

 

however fosci might work better and quicker

 

you can inc penalty charges with the PPI

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, looking at the sheet I uploaded, am I doing it right? I'll have a go with the FOS and the running calculators. It looks as though I insert 8% 30.34%?

 

I started inserting figures in the FOS spreadsheet, which doesn't work, as the column for 'Card balance excluding PPI' gives the same figure as the column for 'Card balance' (with PPI).

 

 

I'll have to try the running spreadsheet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read the red notes tabs on each sheet 1st

 

 

fos CI might be best

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello Everybody,

 

I trust you are all well. Here's a little ditty,

 

Cap One's Ddff have written, chasing for a debt against someone I know (not me). The last payment was well over six years ago and is statute barred. Below is a template letter. Is this one of yours?

 

[ template removed - dx]

Link to post
Share on other sites

doubt cap1 are drydens client?

read the letter again carefully

is this the old cap1 card you reclaimed PPI on for your OH years ago ??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

You've got a good memory. Yes, it is.

 

I found that template letter somewhere and I was going to send it to DDFF.

 

The Ombudsman ordered that the PPI be refunded and that Cap One should reconstitute the account and send us a copy.

 

While the debt was in dispute and under the Ombudsman for investigation, Cap One sold the debt to Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd.

 

The reconstitution they did was inaccurate and they refused to amend it.

I contacted the Ombudsman who was no help.

 

Meanwhile the debt passed into 'statute barred'.

 

So really, I would just like to send DDFF packing.

And I would love your advice, as usual,

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

once again you are making the mistake in thinking Drydens etc are operated by or for CAp1

they and you account are nothing to do with cap1 anymore they sold it on.

 

 

unless drydens letter says WILL court ignore them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Letter states,

'our instructions are to continue with collections activity in this case. Then says to contact their office by 19 June with income and expenditure information to discuss a repayment arrangement.

 

 

Then states, 'If we do not hear from you we will issue a letter before action prior to the issue of a County Court Claim against you.'

 

 

I know the debt was sold on and this is not Cap One. It is Cabot. But would that template letter I sent you deal with this? I thought it came from your site. If not, how do I knock this on the head please?

AA

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a threat-o-gram

ignore unless they do issue LBA

then comeback here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...