Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord demanding money after I have left the property


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2995 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

I'll try to keep this simple but would appreciate some thoughts on the matter.

 

6 years ago I moved in to new property and the agreement was that I paid two months rent upfront half for the first month and the other half for the last month, so when I gave my motive to move out I did not need to pay for that month.

For 6 years we kept the house clean n tidy and never gave the landlord reason for concern. To the extent that he never renewed our tenancy agreement. .

 

So in September we told him we were moving out n that the last months (Octobers) rent was paid and we will be out of there by end of October.

 

We moved told him that e were leaving a bed and wardrobe which he welcomed.

 

2 days ago I receive a letter from an estate agent saying I owe £850 for November rent and tax, money for having to paint the house because children had scribbled writing on a couple of the walls, in 6 years he did not decorate/paint the house for us even though he said he would and for changing locks. All this because we left a couple of boxs and furthermore we didn't return the keys even tho he was on holiday in October and never told us when or where to leave the keys. Trying to charge for clearing out mess which is a lie

 

Really don't know how to approach it I spoke to him and said that I was upset and asked why is a third party getting evolved

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you pay the first payments?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And what if the landlord does get a solicitor involved?

 

Unlikely. It's prob the estate agent doing it. Landlords use them so they don't have to deal with any of this stuff

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

And what if the landlord does get a solicitor involved?

 

Then you respond.

If they take legal action now you can have the claim easily dismissed because the landlord has not follow the pre action protocol.

As far as you are concerned a stranger (estate agent) is asking you money for a non existent debt that you can prove with bank statements and original contract.

Ignore

Link to post
Share on other sites

estate agent cant take you to court as they have no standing in the matter, it is between you and landlord so ignore them and see if LL issues you a demand for anything. I would say probably not but try and calculate the payemnts made up to the date you left and see if there is a balance owed by paying your rent half way through a month

Link to post
Share on other sites

Respond, stating that rent was paid in advance. It may be a misunderstanding as what your landlord is doing is a bit unusual.

 

With regard to the other claims, ask for evidence from the inventory and check-out, along with detailed estimates. They have the right to charge for damage (scribbles) but the cost should be proportionate to the damage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Please could someone help. I am now being threatened that I will have CCJ against me!!!

 

he text me

 

I have been asked by the agent to contact you regarding the payment for the extended rental and damage as you have not responded to their calls or letters etc please could you contact them as a matter of urgency today as they will be proceeding with debt collection via the County Courts after close of business today

Regards .....

 

 

I text back;

 

we have had no dealings with prestige lettings The company has never managed the property whilst we were living there. You claim that we owe you 823.90 please can you give us proof that we owe you this amount ?

We left the property at the end of October and made you aware of our intention and gave you the required one month notice. Regards

---

 

then he text;

 

You were made aware that Prestige Lettings were my agents at least 2 months before you left the property,

You also did not give a months written notice due to you not knowing when the contracts on your new property were to be signed,

Also you withheld your last months rent and used your advance rent payment then still kept your property within the house , not returning the keys or giving me a exact day of leaving,

You then left the property untidy, decor damage by your children etc you were made fully aware of your obligations with written itemised costs for all damages, decor, waste removal and extended rental by the agents acting on my behalf, you called me and did say you would pay the account but asked if I would reduce the amount after informing you that I could not as this amount is what I was out of pocket you were to contact the agent to arrange a payment plan, you have completely ignored all attempts to settle this matter and have only today after my last attempt to speak with you this morning before a ccj was to be taken out which again you ignored you text me,

I did make it abundantly clear to you that my agent Prestige were my appointed legal representative just like a Solicitor would be so please deal with them it was your choice to ignore their letters etc, I am however at this time about to finalise the paperwork for them to proceed with the on line Summons but will postpone until tomorrow to give you one more final time to sort this matter out tonight

 

---

 

I sent him;

 

A complete inaccurate account of what happened.

Never the less I would appreciate if you would stop hassling me

Thanks

 

 

this is the last text he sent;

 

 

I am aware that the agent has just called you as I requested her to do as a matter of curtesy but now after receiving your text I respond as follows:

 

As you have totally ignored all efforts to resolve this matter these past 7/8 weeks we do not feel that by sending you the itemised account back in November 2015 and other letters regarding this issue it can by any means be construed as hassling you! The Country Court Summons will commence tomorrow if that is you wish? the amount you have been itemised in our invoice will be reduced by the council tax amount due to the Council Tax department having received the evidence presented to them by my agent accepting your legal responsibility to pay the tax until The end of November 2015 not October when you informed them you had vacated my property l am sorry you have taken this attitude as I have been a very good landlord to you over the past 6yrs having helped you through your unemployment period and keeping your rent the same since you moved in to help you. So I am very disappointed in your unreasonable actions when you decided to vacate my property,

I would urge you to reconsider your decision on this matter as it will only serve to add further expense to yourself and could leave you with a CCJ against your record as you were previously informed by my agent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As always we do not know full story but LLs response seems reasonable if you did not provide clear unequivocal NTQ, did not leave property in orig move in condition (less FW&T) childish scribbles are not FW&T, left some of your property in situ after vacating, did not return keys on vacating (the last 2 would be enough for LL claim another months rent if a new rent period ensued IMO), a mini skip could cost LL ~£100 for removal of your rubbish.

You won't have a CCJ against you if you pay the Court within 28 days after Judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is claimed that you have been sent a detailed list of costs.

 

This enables you to deal with each cost on a case by case basis.

 

Clearly there is a disagreement as to whether you gave appropriate notice, and the landlord takes the view that you did not. Unfortunately, if you have no written evidence of giving notice you could be on difficult ground.

 

I'm wondering if there is a reason why the landlord got an agent involved. Is there some prior issue that may have led to him doing this, or is it merely coincidence.

 

The landlord is entitled to ask an agent to act for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you give your LL a one months notice to quit in writing, stating, I.E. Today's date is the 4th Jan & I'm giving you 1 months NTQ & will leave by 3rd Feb?

 

If yes do you still have it?

 

Did you leave by the date given in the NTQ? As if you left even 1 day after the given date then the LL can ask for another months rent. (Unless previously agreed by LL).

 

Did you leave the property in good condition & take any pictures to prove this? Reasonable fair wear & tear is allowed esp after 6 yrs but scribbling on walls should have been cleaned or painted over.

 

EDIT; Was an outgoing inventory done with yourself present? If yes did the LL/LA say anything during this regarding any issues?

 

It's also your responsibility to clear out any of your property & not leave any discarded items behind without the LL permission.

 

Personally depending on your answers (if you didn't do the correct NTQ, stayed beyond leaving date, items left & not FW&T) then you may struggle against the LL claims. As in Court you will have to disprove the LL claims with evidence to the contrary.

 

Lastly weigh up the costs of settling the LL invoice now against a (possible) 6yr CCJ & extra £x added on, esp if he presses ahead with Court claim.

 

I do hope you are able to settle this. Good luck!

Edited by *RainbowTears*
Added a comment

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...