Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Student with excessive bailiff fees from parking fines in his fathers name. HELP!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am a student living at a property rented by my parents in the UK, whilst they live abroad in Turkey and are only back in the Uk a handful of times a a year. About two years when i was living in a shared house, i was driving a car that was registered in my Dads name, I received two parking fines within a short period of time which I believed were unjust and therefore appealed against numerous times (I had paid a ridiculous amount for an annual permit of which all spaces were nearly always occupied, mainly by vehicles with no permit therefore I was forced to park 'illegally''). Over the past couple of years I have moved around a lot whilst letters regarding this matter have been addressed to my father and posted to the there UK address.

 

Long story short, after moving back to my parents property in mid-November there was a hand posted letter from Swift Credit in the letter box demanding nearly £300. With help from my older sister who is a solicitor, we got the bailiff action suspended until the 6th January. Since then I have had a bailiff knock on my door and hand post another letter in which the sum due has risen drastically. Basically my worry is that a) the debt is not in my name but my fathers and b) I am an unemployed student, and have no means of paying these fees. I would happily change the debt into my name if this was a possibly, I do not own anything worth taking and would be happy to fight the matter but my Father obviously has a house full of furniture and belongings! With help from my sister, we have been in contact with the council who issue the original PCN's and offered to pay them in full, the CAB who appear to have less knowledge than I do on the matter, and also Swift credit themselves to try and find out when the matter will go back to court. All to no avail. The fact that the debt is in my fathers name is proving to be a massive obstacle.

 

I completely understand that my ignorance and arogance is to blame for my current situation, and now know that issues like these MUST be delt with immediately and not brushed under the carpet. I have read numerous forums and advice online. A few threads that I have read on this site have given invaluable advice to people in similar situations to mine, I would be so grateful for any help/assistance that could be provided.

 

Also I must add that, my father finding out about this situation and being responsible for my debt of such expense would be the WORST possible outcome.

 

Any facts, figures or evidence can be provided.

 

Regards,

 

Danny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who ordered the suspension and on what grounds? if it was pending a further hearing then Swifts should back off until that takes place.

 

WD

 

Hi WD,

 

My sister rang Swift telling them the house was unoccupied and asked if action could be suspended as my father would not be in the country until after Christmas, this was just to give me time to understand the situation without the fees increasing further.

 

Any advice on what to do next would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Danny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you could do is write to the parking services at the council and explain that you were the driver and you are responsible for the PCN's. Explain that your father will not be back into the country until later this year and you would like to pay the PCN at the stage it was issued.

 

Who did you appeal this too?

 

Because the car is not in your name you may have to tell your father, he can then transfer it over to your name as you were the drive at the time.

 

To be honest I cant really see what other options you have. Sorry. :(

 

Others may be able to see a way round this, but owning up to your father seems the obvious thing to do in this situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice seanarmarts, I did actually ring the council a few days ago explaining the situation and stating that I would pay the fines immediately, I was told that the computer system would not accept payment whilst it was in the hands of the baliffs but 'to make sure the bailiffs are behaving correctly', implying the chances are they were not. Swift Credit deal with all Cardiff City councils parking/motoring cases so maybe he was not just speculating. After the conversation I accessed the councils online PCN payment system and realised he was telling the truth. I have also been told there is no possible way to change the name of a debt :/

 

Ploddertom, I have received two hand delivered letters from the bailiff. On the second occasion he knocked the door and I answered never expecting it to be a bailiff as it was 7:30pm, I immediately stepped outside and shut the door behind me, he asked for my father (using his name) and I panicked and told him my father would not be here until next week. I knew that was the wrong thing to say, In hindsight I should of said he was out the country for the foreseeable future in order to deter the bailiff and increase the chance of the case going back to council. I have educated myself a lot in the past week on my rights with regards to bailiffs, I'm fully prepared to question his ID, warrant and film any encounter if necessary. I'm thankful for your reply.

 

An ideal solution would be for the bailiffs to accept my father was out the country long term and for the case to go back to the council where I with the help of my sister can hopefully pay what is necessary and deal with the situation, without the involvement of a cowboy charging ridiculous fees as he sees fit. I've read that a bailiff company has 180 days to pursue a debt, after that it goes back to the creditor, can anybody confim this is true? Or inform me otherwise.

 

All help is much appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Danny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PCN's like these are valid for 12 months. I asked about the dates on the Warrant as you say some of them are originally more than 2 years old. You could in theory sit it out and wait till it is handed back to the Council, Bailiffs actually only manage to settle approx 20% of all PCN's they are given.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told that the council are legally allowed to chase a debt for 6 years? I think waiting it out might be my only option at this point. With regards to a warrant, do the bailiffs use intimidation and threatening behaviour initially because they do not have a court warrant and it is not easy/time consuming for them to obtain one? If this is the case, I'm sure waiting it out could work, as the first bailiff letter received is dated 24th August 2012.

 

Thanks for your rely.

 

Danny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are getting mixed up with differing debts. You may be thinking of Council Tax or Business Rates with regard to 6 years, if they obtain a Liability Order within 6 years of the debt being due then they never become Statute barred. PCN Warrants only last for a 12 month and are not renewable.

 

If you think you can stand the tactics etc used by some of the Bailiffs that cal then so be it but be warned constant knocking at the door for an hour or so can wear you down. They are also known for asking about you to neighbours and may inadvertently reveal they are Bailiffs.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

PLODDERTON

PCN Warrants only last for a 12 month and are not renewable.

 

Do you mean if a bailliffs warant of execution or high court write are not enforced/unable to enforce, then the councils cannot, use bailliffs to try & get their money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...