Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Can a PPC (claimant) refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

my neighbour has crashed into my parked car and is denying it... what can i do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

2 weeks ago i came home from work to find a big dent in my car wing. on looking around it was obvious that it had to be from a car reversing out of the alleyway opposite to where the car was parked. looked around and hey presto my neighbours car which is always parked down there had a nice clean patch on the rear drivers side bumper and a new scratch. she's hit my car, then cleaned all the evidence from her car, then just hoped i wouldn't figure out who it was. the police are useless and wont do anything without witnesses even tho the officer involved said it couldn't have been anyone but her. I am 3rd party insured with no legal assistance, my insurance wont do anything. theres no real damage to her car, its a bloody range rover and she's hit me with the most solid part of her car!

 

she's avoiding me. i've called, knocked on the door, left 3 letters spelling out that i know it was her, including photographs showing the only part of her car that was clean that day was the part that hit me... and nothing! the evidence is staring her in the face, i know she's done it but in the absence of any witnesses to the accident i appear to be up the creek without a paddle.... is there any action i could take here?

 

what can i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your stuffed here, without much chance of being able to prove it was her for sure. Unless there are any CCTV recordings or witnesses that suddenly become available. You could post a note through other neighbours doors, just stating that your car was damaged on x date between the hour of x, asking if anyone was witness to this to come forward. Don't put anything on such a note about who might or might not be responsible, as this could be libelous.

 

If you can't get any CCTV footage or witnesses, what you could do is apply some pressure to the neighbour. Send her a recorded delivery letter (so you have record of posting/receipt) headed 'letter before action', basically advising her that you are holding her responsible for damage to your car on x date between x hours and will be taking this matter to court. Send her details of the cost of the repair and advise her that unless she settles the amount within (say) 21 days or admits liability in writing and provides details of her Insurance policy, you will be left with no alternative.

 

Without CCTV or witnesses, all you have is circumstantial evidence and you would be wasting time taking this to court. If she does not reply to the letter you should stop, as you don't want to be accussed of harassment and have the Police knock on your door.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Unlcebulgaria in that you are stuffed without good contemporaneous evidence.

 

Do the LBA and she is legally obliged to give you her insurance details. If she doesn't then send her a letter stating that as per Section 154 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 if she does not give you her insurance details then you will be informing the police of the breach of the regulations. It is possible that once you are in contact with her insurers they may make an economic settlement to you as even if they instruct solicitors and win at court, it is still likely to cost them more than paying for the damage to your vehicle - although I still think you may be wasting your time...

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice guys... having written 3 letters to her already i think theres not much point in trying to pressure her more as she'll just ignore it like the others. I blocked her car in the alleyway this morning with my car, so she rang and spoke to me to ask me to move it. she denied it strenuously but when i asked her to explain why her rear bumper was clean that day she hung up!

 

unfortunately as much as I'd like to do something about it I am bound by my morals to act within the law. bum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threaten her with court and ask her for her Insurance details re the above. Getting the letter by recorded may prompt a change of attitude.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 154 of the Road Traffic Act 1988:

 

154 Duty to give information as to insurance or security where claim made. E+W+S

(1)A person against whom a claim is made in respect of any such liability as is required to be covered by a policy of insurance under section 145 of this Act must, on demand by or on behalf of the person making the claim

(a)state whether or not, in respect of that liability—

(i)he was insured by a policy having effect for the purposes of this Part of this Act or had in force a security having effect for those purposes, or

(ii)he would have been so insured or would have had in force such a security if the insurer or, as the case may be, the giver of the security had not avoided or cancelled the policy or security, and

(b)if he was or would have been so insured, or had or would have had in force such a security—

(i)give such particulars with respect to that policy or security as were specified in any certificate of insurance or security delivered in respect of that policy or security, as the case may be, under section 147 of this Act, or

(ii)where no such certificate was delivered under that section, give the following particulars, that is to say, the registration mark or other identifying particulars of the vehicle concerned, the number or other identifying particulars of the insurance policy issued in respect of the vehicle, the name of the insurer and the period of the insurance cover.

(2)If without reasonable excuse, a person fails to comply with the provisions of subsection (1) above, or wilfully makes a false statement in reply to any such demand as is referred to in that subsection, he is guilty of an offence.

 

Hope this helps...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would try something completely different. Get hold of a CCTV camera and pop it up when you know she is not there. Nothing loud, just a small camera that does not stand out. Then, write one last time and point out that failing to stop after an accident is a criminal offence and if she does not provide her insurance details within 7 days you will take the footage from your CCTV camera (which overlooks the alleyway) to the police. The fact that there is no footage of the incident is for you to know. If I were her I would buckle after popping outside and seeing that there actually is a CCTV camera pointed straight at the alleyway.

 

The other alternative is to report the accident to your insurers providing her as the third party. Just her name, address and vehicle details. She would have to respond to any claim otherwise the claim could be settled in default against her. Any accident investiagator will see what actually happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately my house does not look over the alleyway so the CCTV claim is not an option.

 

When she's been presented with evidence (photographs posted with a letter, showing a nice clean bit on the rear drivers bumper but the rest of the car hasn't been washed in weeks) and challenged on it when i spoke to her she's just hung up on me. the only reason i got to speak with her in the first place is because i blocked her car in the alleyway. i won't be doing that again for obvious reasons but i will write the lba.

Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting development. received a call from her b/f last night. luckily i recorded it. basically they're saying i cost them money because i bloced her in (she wasnt properly blocked in, she got out and was at work 15/20 mins late). accusing me of harassment even tho i've only spoken to her twice on the issue. said if i ever did it again i'd cause more trouble than i know. I said I wouldn't block her in again, and I'm not going to because I only did it so she would speak to me. every time I asked about the mystery clean patch on the car the convo was diverted he said several times that i couldn't prove it. he accused me of doing it because there's damage on the wing mirror that was on the car when i bought it! then i was getting irate and was telling him the policeman said it was her, he told to write to her and see what happened, he didnt tell me to block her car in but i thought what the hell as i'd heard nothing from her...

 

he then said i'd said the policeman told me to do it and he's gonna call the police and tell them what i said.. clearly this Neanderthal is trying to bully me, i dont expect to hear from the police on this matter. the recording is clear as day, i clearly said the policeman didnt tell me to block her in.

 

I can't believe the nerve of these people, accusing me of harassment when i've spoken to her twice about the matter.

 

any thoughts guys?

 

thinking about getting a solicitor to the the lba. I'm quite sure she wont provide her insurance details, or answer the letter.

 

i need opinions, as I'm unsure what the best course of action is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget about it, as you cannot prove anything and they are not going to admit anything. Keep a copy of the call, just in case anything happens. You could report her b/f for threatening you, by asking the Police to listen to the call. But I think the Police have better things to be doing.

 

You could speak to a solicitor, but I think they may advise you same.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

LBA then small claims court. You have evidence, don't let them get away with it!

 

As mentioned, they LEGALLY have to give you their insurance details. Its upto the insurance company to decide what to do next.

By day, computer and mobile phone technical support... by night home mechanic and Rover / MG enthusiast!

 

Cars: 1998 Rover 620ti

Computers: HP nc8430 Business Notebook, Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dunno, to be honest the way they've handled it from the outset should have told me i was wasting my time. its a shame, but i dont think i can be bothered with the hassle. live life be happy and all that. its too much stress, i don't like to roll over but i think i've got to admit i've tried and failed. the photo is just circumstntial and it would just be my luck that they'd fight it and win. i guess this is a lesson learned about how the law works in the uk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very similar, but in Tesco car park. They gave me their home address but refused to give me insurance details.

 

An LBA later and I had £200 in my bank.

By day, computer and mobile phone technical support... by night home mechanic and Rover / MG enthusiast!

 

Cars: 1998 Rover 620ti

Computers: HP nc8430 Business Notebook, Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Do the lba. Don't use a solictor as it will cost you a lot, but do send it by recorded delivery. If she does not provide you with her insurance details then she has broken the law and you can persue that - at this point she cannot ignore you, she may stall but she has to give you her insurance details.

 

The next step is to contact her insurance company. You have a lot more influence here as their insurance company will not want to waste time dealing with you over some minor damage. It's not guaranteed but you may get lucky and they will just pay out the claim to prevent escalating costs. It will also count as a fault claim against her. If she continues to deny it and her insurance company backs her then you can go as far as to take it to court and get her to testify as to what happened under oath. No way to prove she isn't lying at this point, but hopefully the pressure of committing perjury will make her see sense. You could do the same through the small claims court but that will cost you, whereas going through her insurance company won't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only problem being the £300 excess that you have to pay if it goes on an untraced claim

 

But it may not be so. It is quite apparent from the OP's account that the neighbour was involved so the MIB will simply claim from their insurers.

 

Please Note

 

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...