Jump to content

mutaf76

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mutaf76

  1. thanks alot. Their failed attempt still cost me £75 to set aside the ccj and alot of worried time.
  2. Hi everyone, I need your quick answers then I will tell my story with MIB & CCM and how I ended up with CONSENT ORDER from the solicitors of CCM. Firstly, please someone explain me what this CONSENT ORDER is. It says; By Consent it is ordered that; 1. Default Judgment entred on the 20th January 2011 be set aside. 2.The registry entry be cancelled. 3.The Clamimant discontunies the claim against the Defendant ansd will not pursue any claim arising from the Road Traffic Accident dated 7 December 2002. 4. There shall be no order as to cost 1,2 and 3 are quite clear to understand but what 4 means? Is this Consent Order means, they drop al the charges and will not pursue it again ever? Thanks for your time and help. mutaf76
  3. Hi again, There is no judgments against me. I have received the court papers yesterday. All I need to know how come they never gone to court (maybe they did and claim rejected by judge) dsnce dec 2002 and how come they can go to court now? is there a website to find out whether MIB took me to court before without my knowledge and court decision about it? thanks again everyone
  4. Hi again, I received a court letter today regarding the claim, apparently they took me to court. I thought (from your last reply) they could not take me the court. What should i do now?
  5. I have used the website you gave me for my last 3 addresses and nothing on any of my addresses shows any ccj. I have checked county court judgments not high court judgment, did i check the right one? Does it mean debt collectors trying to make a quick money by teling me they will go to court if i do not come up with a payment plan? When you mentioned "statute barred", that means they cannot go to court about this case? So there is only one matter to which is to inform MIB the claim was bogus so that they can recoup the money from claimant, is it the right approach? "In addition in view of the date concerned, the matter would be subject to the statute of limitations act 1980. " what are the implacations of this act in my case? Thank you for your time and advice. mutaf76
  6. Thank you for your reply. I would like to pint out that back in 2002 insurance company contacted me for this particular claim. they said it was an hit and run. I had the car and no insurance at that time therefore i was not driving it at all. I told them i do not drive the car. I suspect that someone who knows me and my new address gave the details to insurance company for bogus claim. i know it is bogus claim for the fact that insurance company sent the letter to my new address even though car was still register on my previous address. if it was a real hit and run case, they should have sent that letter to my previous address whre the car registered. At that time insurance company told me they will look into it. Then i received a letter for £10,000. Do you think I still should contact to MIB for details. Thanks
  7. Hi ianfm, I am experiencing exactly same thing now. Would you please tell me what the outcome was since last conversation? Thanks mutaf76
×
×
  • Create New...