Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cancelling A Teletext Holiday


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5830 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter who is 17 and her friends decided to look into going on holiday in June when they are all 18. So they contacted teletext and enquired about a holiday for the 4 of them. The lady advised them that she could get them a all inclusive deal for 2 weeks in Salou. They could secure the booking with a £1.00. My daughter rang me and asked if she should go ahead and book it and I said as long as it was all in agreemnet then yes. So they went ahead and booked it.

 

When she got home from college she decided to have a look on the website at the hotel - to our horro the write ups on the hotel were appalling. There wasn't a nice thing to say about it. The site also indicated that there had been things stolen from the hotal and the food had been unfit to eat. After lengthy discussions my daughter decided to cancle the booking.

 

She contacted teletext and asked them to cancel it - the operator saiid she needed to ring back the next day and cancel it with a different department.

 

The very next day she rang the department concerned and after a lengthy discussion with the operator she told my daughter that the cancellation had to be in writing, sent recorded delivery and then they would cancel the holiday.

 

Then the bombshell was dropped - she told my daughter that she would have to pay £75.00 per person for cancelling the holiday. My daughter asked why and she was told it is in the terms and conditions of the agreement and the operator who booked you holiday would have told you this. She advised her that nothing had been mentioned about the cancellation fee of £75.00. After only 1 day she was being asked to pay £75.00.

 

After 2 weeks of waiting to find out if the holiday has been cancelled she rang teletext again - they told her because the letter had taken so long to get to them that they would be charging £75.00 per person. As her card id the card they used will it be taken from her?

 

I am incensed that a holiday compnay can charge £75.00 for cancelling a holiday 24 hours after it was booked. There was no other way they would accept the cancellation unless it was in writing. Can they accept a booking of 4 people aged 17? Why wasn't this explained to them on the phone that there was a cancellation fee?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi laineynic,

 

Its standard with most tour operators that when they offer a low deposit, in the case of cancellation you must pay the full deposit. Check any brochure or website and you will find this. It is to entice you to book early.

 

You say that the terms were not explained to your daughter at the time of booking. If she 100% certain, she can request the call records to prove this.

 

Have a look at this thread started by mutley2007, I hope he does not mind me using it:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/holiday-companies/122894-cancellation-customer-going-court.html

 

It is a similar issue - T & C's not explained at time of booking. He got the result he was looking for.

 

As a side note, your daughter read some bad reviews about the hotel? No holiday company will allow cancellation without charges because of bad reviews.

 

Out of interest, can you post the name of the hotel?

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your posting - I understand what your saying but to be made to pay £75 after only 24 hours seems very harsh. Surely there must be some kind of cooling of period. What about the distanc selling laws?

 

At 17 is she legally allowed to ook a hiloday? The T&C'S weren't explaind to them, she has signed nothing. I understand that on friday they ill attempt to take £300 from her bank, even though she has told them that she hasn't the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again laineynic,

 

I've never heard of a cooling off period for holidays but if you check the link I gave you that should help a lot.

 

I don't think they have done anything wrong by booking the holiday, as they will all be 18 at the time of departure. What about 18-30 hols? They do it all the time. If she was not legally allowed then the agent would not have been able to go forward with the booking.

 

Remember, Teletext are only the booking agents. Its like going into a travel agent in the high street. They are booking holidays for Tour Operators such as First Choice, Thomson etc so they have to abide by the T & C's laid out by the particular operator.

 

As I said though, if the T & C's were not explained, this is your best bet based on Mutley's experience.

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the distanc selling laws?

 

Holidays are exempt. There is no right of cancellation or cooling off period.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why, I don't make the laws! It's probably to do with the nature of booking holidays - you can't have a 14 day cooling off period when you could have been on the holiday in that time.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on the OFT site and it doesnt mention that holidays are exempt from the ruling. If your not sure of the law why state it as being so?

 

I have read other comments fom previous postings and hey used that argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure of it, and I have never suggested otherwise.

 

The details are on the OFT website. The exceptions are, funnily enough, detailed on the 'exceptions' page.

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Exceptions to the regulations

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To quote from OFT "the provisions do not apply to package travel"

 

laineynic, barracad is trying to help you and as a moderator of this forum I do not think for one minute that he would post without knowing the facts. No point going for the distance selling angle if it does not apply to your daughters case.

As I said before you have two options. Fight them on the lack of info at time of booking - like Mutley did or just take the holiday.

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked baracuda a question which was "why are holidays eempt" he was the one who got on his high horse and said he didn'tmake the rules.

 

I am beginning to wonder wether this sie is as useful as it used to be. I seem to ask the wrong questions and get blasted. I am not an epert and I asked for advise. Instead I get an obnoixous reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a bad day lainey? In response to barracad's reply you asked why they were exempt and his response was simply that he didn't know as he didn't make the laws. You then came back and said "If your not sure of the law why state it as being so?" Barracad did not state that he wasn't sure of the law only that he didn't know why the powers that be exempted them. I think you have misinterpreted things. Go and put the kettle on and have a nice cuppa :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well holidays are exempt - that is the information you were looking for, is it not? As for why a particular law exists then that would not be the kind of thing you can expect to find an answer to here as this would be down to the people who put such laws in place.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

laineynic

 

We have answered your questions the best we can. In all honesty, the only obnoxious reply has been posted by yourself.

Perhaps you need a specialist in travel law to help you further.

 

I wish you and your daughter good luck in finding a resolution.

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just thought i'd update on the latest from the Sun4U saga - we have been in constant contact with the holiday company to have the £75 per person penatly stopped and have got no where. Yesterday we received a letter giving the girls 48 hours to pay the £475 each.

 

We have advised them that they did not advise the girls at anytime of the cancellation penalty. There response was we don't have the time to read out the terms and conditions over te phone. They have now stopped responding to any emails we have sent and the customer services advisor I have been dealing with won't give me details of someone more senior.

 

It seems that many others are falling into the same thing. I just wonder why this is not regulated better. Surely you should be able to change your mind without being penalised especially after only 4 hours.

 

I am completely stumped - it looks like holding out and not paying the £75 has put the girls in a position of having to pay for a holiday that they won't be taking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying this would be the correct answer, but have you requested new card details for your DD? I assume the attempted transaction was declined. £75 PP is a joke if you ask me.

 

What do they threaten should they not pay? Could anybody tell me if this is liable for court action? (not that I think they'd bother) only, if they did, the T&C's bit would be on your side, would it not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

On the 14th April I spoke my daughters friends mum contacted customer services to sort out changing the holiday. Despite being promised that they would move it foc, the told her there would be a charge per person. We even had the persons name who told us she would move it free of charge. After a 15 minute debate we decided that we would give in and pay the £75 charge and use another holiday company. We gave in and asked how to pay. We were told to put it in a email and someone would get back to us with what we need to pay to cancel the holiday.

 

11 days later - no email, no response to the email and the demand letters have stopped. Could it be that they have finally given in? or is this the lull before a storm.

 

I would never ever use Sun4u.com ever again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

We have advised them that they did not advise the girls at anytime of the cancellation penalty. There response was we don't have the time to read out the terms and conditions over te phone.

 

Isn't that the get-out for you. Was that said in an e-mail? Isn't it the case that the contract isn't binding until you receive the written t & C. Think of any only purchases. You always have to tick the T & C box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am using this against them. Still no response from anyone regarding the cancellation penalty. I have contacted them, and one of the other mums has been in rouch and the correspondnce from them has stopped. No threatening letters or any thing now. I have enough emails from them admitting that they don'r give t&c's over the phone.

 

Thanks bribri

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...