Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.   House or Flat? Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Again, points as above. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) Why serve a delapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease. I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to buy the freehold of the property. It's normal, whether it is a "normal" leaseholder or a repossession with a leasehold house, to claim this right of enfranchisement and sell the property with said rights attached and the purchase price of the freehold included in the final completion price. That's likely what the mortgage provider wished to do. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at? Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. So this is dealt with then. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.  You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension. You'd need a Deed of Variation for that. This may be done at the same time but the lease has already been extended once and that's all they have a right to. The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved. The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there. Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC/CABOT Help please


rh999
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi there

 

I could do with some help on this issue, as it is quite a difficult situation.

 

I had an account with HSBC up until around 1999, where i had some financial problems at that time. My account at the time got converted into a loan (of which the majority was charges).

This then got passed to Metropolitan Collection services in 2001, and i agreed to pay them a monthly payment to reduce the debt.

 

As far as i was concerned (i set up a standing order, which was paid as per their instructions) this was paid on time every month, up to 2004, where i believed the debt had been cleared.

 

A few months ago i received a letter from Cabot financial stating there was an amount still outstsanding on the debt.

 

I disputed the debt at the time, and they said they would raise this with HSBC. i have this week received a printout from Cabot showing the payments i made.

 

Which shows there is an outstanding balance at the end. The payments tie up with my records from my bank account statements (well back to 2002 anyway).

 

My problem is i have no correspondence from HSBC or MCS from the time, which may indicate a discrepency in the amount, can i SAR this from HSBC or MCS?

 

Now to the questions;

1. As this debt was made up from charges can i try and get a refund (even though the charges were placed on the account over 6 years ago?

2. Should i CCA them? i cannot remember signing a credit agreement for the loan at the time, as it was transferred from the bank account. the credit agreement number quoted in the letter is ny old bank account number from HSBC..

3. This debt shows on my credit file (have seenn it) as a default. presume i can get removed under banking code, if i dispute it?

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. As this debt was made up from charges can i try and get a refund (even though the charges were placed on the account over 6 years ago?

 

Yes the limitation period runs from 6 years from when you were first aware that there were unlawful charges on the account. Not 6 years from when the charges were applied.

 

2. Should i CCA them? i cannot remember signing a credit agreement for the loan at the time, as it was transferred from the bank account. the credit agreement number quoted in the letter is ny old bank account number from HSBC..

I would CCA Cabot as they are a particularly unpleasant DCA and this should slow them down. Send it recorded delivery with a £1 crossed postal order and do not sign the letter or add an electronic signature.

 

3. This debt shows on my credit file (have seenn it) as a default. presume i can get removed under banking code, if i dispute it?

You would think so but they are often reluctant to remove defaults. You may have to go through the FOS or go to court to get the default removed.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh just a word of warning, NEVER speak to Cabot on the phone - it is a complete waste of time and they are only interested in one thing, payment.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very easy to scan and paste signatures onto documents.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they wouldnt do that would they?

 

They may not but there have been instances on CAG where others have alledgedly done just that. Better to be safe than sorry.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to make sure I don't give rise to any legal action against the site I won't mention any names.

 

There is a dca that I have had dealings with and I consider them to be the absolute lowest form of life. They will try any underhand methods they can think of to extract more money from you.

 

if there is one thing I vow to achieve before I die it is to have this company and it's directors banned from trading. I am currently involved with a group of victims of this particular company in trying to bring legal action against them.

 

Never under estimate the lengths these people will go to in order to increase their profit margin! Forged signatures are just one minor example of what they are capable of!

 

These are my own personal views and none of the comments on this post are endorsed by the Consumer Action Group!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi there

 

i could do with some help with developments on this.

 

sinc eposting, i have CCA'd Cabot and sent SAR to HSBC on the charges.

 

clocks ticking on the SAR to HSBC, bit the 12 days on CCA to cabot ran out today.

 

since sending the CCA to cabot i have had a letter from them as follows;

 

thanks for your letter dated xxxx

please find enclosed your cheque for the £1.00 fee required under 77-78 of the consumer credit act, as we do not accept this statutory fee.

cabot will always assist the customer and the creditor in providing information and therefore i can confirm that cabot has requested the relevant documentation from the vendor HSBC and on receipt this will be forwarded to you accordingly. there may sometimes be a delay in providing the documents, as the vendor may have to retrieve these from theor archives. therefore we would appreciate your patience and cooperation in this matter.

you cantact us anytime blah blah

 

note on this - i sent a postal order not cheque (prats). can they do this? does this affect anything from my point of view?

 

i want to send a letter stating they are in default of the CCA request but cannot find anything in the templates library. any links anyone?

 

this seems a very nice letter from these guys, opposite to what i have seen on here about their tactics? have they changed their ways now?

 

any help on ow to respond would be appreciated.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks as though they are making a very nice gesture of supplying your info for free. You could always send a letter back to them saying thank you, but the deadline for them supplying the information was xx.xx.xx. They have had plenty of time to comply to your requests and that you would appreciate them supplying you with the info requested in the letter date xx.xx xx within the next 7 or 14 days.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a standard letter from Cabot. They can wave the £1 fee but it doesn't remove their obligation and they know it. There really is very little point in writing to them while they are only in default. They are not chasing the payment on the account so at the moment they are doing nothing wrong.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rh999 although you're not really having a big problem with Cabot at the moment (so I have kept your thread in the HSBC forum) please be aware that we have a forum exclusively dedicated to Cabot and people who are having to dealing with them. If they do become a problem and you would like your thread moved to that forum at any point just shout.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please find enclosed your cheque for the £1.00 fee required under 77-78 of the consumer credit act, as we do not accept this statutory fee.

 

 

cabot will always assist the customer and the creditor in providing information and therefore i can confirm that cabot has requested the relevant documentation from the vendor...

 

this seems a very nice letter from these guys, opposite to what i have seen on here about their tactics? have they changed their ways now?

 

Standard tactic from Cabot. Aren't they lovely, sending my quid back and offering to help? No. They're trying to make you think that they're above the law. They are a "creditor" as defined by s189 of the Consumer Credit Act, and are therfore bound to supply you with the documents you requested.

 

And if they're not a "creditor", then how could you be a "debtor", eh? ;)

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that DJ. Your right of course.

 

interesting letter received from HSBC today regarding my SAR request on the account i had before cabot got their hands on it.

 

thanks for your letter (not).

we note the account you are requesting statements for is a loan account. as this will not have incurred charges in the same manner as a current acct we have not provided this information to you

we are happy to pay for any information and we return your payment.

if you require more information please let us know

 

this was a current acct before they converted it into a loan, and i'm sure they did not give me a new acct number for it.

 

looks like i'm doing some digging around my garage at weekend!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alternatively you could wait until the 40 days are up then send them a Letter Before Action and if they don't respond favourable to that then you can file a court claim against them (plus a couple of hundred quid in damages/costs thanks very much). They can't pick and choose what information they are willing to give you under the Data Protection Act. They have to legally give you the info you have requested.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that DJ. Your right of course.

 

interesting letter received from HSBC today regarding my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request on the account i had before cabot got their hands on it.

 

thanks for your letter (not).

 

we note the account you are requesting statements for is a loan account. as this will not have incurred charges in the same manner as a current acct we have not provided this information to you

 

we are happy to pay for any information and we return your payment.

 

if you require more information please let us know

 

this was a current acct before they converted it into a loan, and i'm sure they did not give me a new acct number for it.

 

looks like i'm doing some digging around my garage at weekend!

 

Write back and tell them this was a current account to begin with - remind them the 40 days is still ticking away for the SAR request etc.. and specifically say in your letter that you want ALL information they hold on you for ALL accounts - it will still fall into the same £10 request they won't charge another fee.

 

I will try find the SAR I used to do this with - some companies will just send statements to you else - but you actually need copies of all statements, letters, telephone calls, manual interventions, sale agreement, default notice, Deed of Assignment = anything they hold on you and your accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try adding this to your reminder reply (or something like it add anything else that I didn't include here and alter dates accordingly)

 

 

I again wrote to you on xx xxxx 2007 with a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act 1998. I find you merely sent me xxxxx as a print out and tell me my request is complete in your letter dated xxxxx 2007. For the avoidance of doubt, any such documents that you might offer in response should have as a minimum:

  • The name of Original Creditor
  • The name of the New Owner
  • The amount of Original Debt
  • Default Notice as issued
  • The date of sale to the new owner
  • Deed of Assignment
  • Deed of Sale Document
  • The signature of both the Original Creditor and New Owner
  • Statements belonging to this account
  • Copies of any letters that your company sent to me
  • Transcripts of any telephone calls made to me by your company
  • PPI insurance details of the policy that was in place with this account
  • A "True Copy" of the Credit Agreement you claim was in place.

This is not an exhaustive list by any means - but my SAR request should include all copies of ALL Data that your company hold on me and this account - your forty days to meet this request are ending on xxx 2007 - so there are not many days left before this request is also in default. I require the above list of documents as a minimum and I do trust this request is now clearer to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

 

just a quick update on this...

 

cabot have gone very quiet...

 

HSBC havent. i responded to the letter stating the account was a current 1 before they converted to a loan. it got transferred to a compliants unit, and on friday i called them and got confirmation they have the info i require.

 

in the meantime Cabots 40 days were up to provide me with the cca. and according to HSBC they will be hard pushed to get one.

 

it seems as far as HSBC are concerned i wil not get much info on the SAR, as the account was closed in 2001, and they dont keep any info prior to that..

 

with my suspicions aroused i decided to call cabot (withheld my number) i know some will say not to call, but they dont bother me too much, and i tend to tie them in knots if they start on me

 

when i called i specifically asked if Cabot were acting on behalf of HSBC or had they purchased the debt. they confirmed the debt was purchased in may last year. not sure if i mentioned before but there is a default on my credit file for this supposed debt. the entry for this "default" was placed on my file last june.....

 

wonder who did that then?

 

i will be sending an LBA to cabot tomorrow instructing them to cease any collection activity, and any data usage on me including removing the default.

 

see how it goes eh??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...