Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4591 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

IF Welcome goes into administration they would have to honour all existing complaints and court action brought against them. They are still regulated by the FSA and as such still have to abide by its terms.

 

If there is a potential buyer in the future, they will carry over the litigation with the debt book.

 

Stewie

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF Welcome goes into administration they would have to honour all existing complaints and court action brought against them. They are still regulated by the FSA and as such still have to abide by its terms.

 

If there is a potential buyer in the future, they will carry over the litigation with the debt book.

 

Stewie

 

but isn't administration where you get pennies for pounds? or is it different cos it's FSA regulated?

 

Sorry if i'm being thick!

Link to post
Share on other sites

welcome should have published its accounts last friday

 

i mean cattles

 

That's very interesting. Don't they have a statutory obligation to announce the results when they say they will?

fix (vb.):

1. to paper over, obscure, hide from public view;

2. to work around, in a way that produces unintended consequences that are worse than the original problem.

Usage: "Vista fixes many of the shortcomings of Windows XP".

Link to post
Share on other sites

but isn't administration where you get pennies for pounds? or is it different cos it's FSA regulated?

 

Sorry if i'm being thick!

 

 

If you are a share holder you pretty much get nothing for your share, I think I heard at the moment Cattles is worth less than 18 to the pound. They have absolutly NO equity in the company other than the loan book.

 

If you owe them money they will continue to try and collect or the administrators will. But doubt very much they will call the loan up without massive incentive.

 

Stewie

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

andie

what i think will happen with cattles is this

the shares will get suspended

cattles will close there outfits like welcome finance, shop a cheque, and who ever else

it will remain a skeleton company not on the stock exchange.

cattle will still be liable for all current obligations.

 

ive been chatting on the cattles share page with the hooray henries

 

it seems barclays are pulling out and cutting there losses

 

so where is cattles going to pay its 500 mil loan by july

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so seen as I don't owe them anything anymore and I have a case lodged against them in court - if Cattles goes down my case still lives on - ergo they have to pay me my money....sorry if I sound really selfish but I've put soooo much work into this case I just don't want it to disappear

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very interesting. Don't they have a statutory obligation to announce the results when they say they will?

 

 

Hi GK,

 

I dont think they could announce results as they were all incorrect, thats why they called in Delloits. I suspect they have done a full audit and can only release numbers when completed.

 

3 Directors got suspended due to the numbers being all wrong, so it has to be pretty bad.

 

The impairment they were going to list two weeks ago seems to have jumped something crazy and the number being tossed around is over £200 mil and ontop they have to repay bank roll over of £500mil.

 

They even did an internal memo to staff to re-assure them they not going tits up. 08712 201 923 The CEO trying to assure staff everything will be ok.

 

Hope this helps

 

Stewie

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

andie

what i think will happen with cattles is this

the shares will get suspended

cattles will close there outfits like welcome finance, shop a cheque, and who ever else

it will remain a skeleton company not on the stock exchange.

cattle will still be liable for all current obligations.

 

ive been chatting on the cattles share page with the hooray henries

 

it seems barclays are pulling out and cutting there losses

 

so where is cattles going to pay its 500 mil loan by july

 

That's encouraging. I notice that Barclays bought up 4% of shares on thursday, then dropped 1% back on friday - i wonder what they're up to?

 

Personally, i hope they do go into administration - we've been trying to reject the car, and i'm hoping that the administrators would rather have an actual asset (i.e. a car to sell on) than continue to argue over the contract, which we think is unenforceable anyway ;)

fix (vb.):

1. to paper over, obscure, hide from public view;

2. to work around, in a way that produces unintended consequences that are worse than the original problem.

Usage: "Vista fixes many of the shortcomings of Windows XP".

Link to post
Share on other sites

accounts have to be released on an annual basis

its the law

 

funny the last ceo a while back dumped all his shares and got a golden hand shake

 

he knew it was going tits up

 

 

Word on the ground is they are having record amounts of sick leave too, and all the staff are jumping ship. Cattles have 4000 staff on the payroll so the smart ones are getting out in the market place before the rest.

 

Even directors are calling in sickies

Edited by 082stewie
Arrh Spelling

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently their outgoing finance director was asked to stay on for longer to help sort out the mess. He couldn't because of 'health issues' - go figure ;)

fix (vb.):

1. to paper over, obscure, hide from public view;

2. to work around, in a way that produces unintended consequences that are worse than the original problem.

Usage: "Vista fixes many of the shortcomings of Windows XP".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have just listened to the CEO and we can all expect more harassing phone calls for sure.

 

Hi GK,

 

I dont think they could announce results as they were all incorrect, thats why they called in Delloits. I suspect they have done a full audit and can only release numbers when completed.

 

3 Directors got suspended due to the numbers being all wrong, so it has to be pretty bad.

 

The impairment they were going to list two weeks ago seems to have jumped something crazy and the number being tossed around is over £200 mil and ontop they have to repay bank roll over of £500mil.

 

They even did an internal memo to staff to re-assure them they not going tits up. 08712 201 923 The CEO trying to assure staff everything will be ok.

 

Hope this helps

 

Stewie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just been reading the stock chatter on Google discussions, and it really does seem like they're dead in the water.

 

As an aside - i'm conscious that we have hijacked Roxy's thread. Mods, would it be worth moving this into its own thread? Or should we just do the decent thing and start our own ;)

fix (vb.):

1. to paper over, obscure, hide from public view;

2. to work around, in a way that produces unintended consequences that are worse than the original problem.

Usage: "Vista fixes many of the shortcomings of Windows XP".

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this thread has a life of its own now!!! I think about 10 people have added in separate claims etc etc and it always goes back to the same topic of how rancid Welcome finance are.

Sorry Roxy!;)

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Postggj, I was reading your thread fully there and I need to ask a couple of questions.....

 

One of your complaints was about the Acceptance Fee not being separate from the credit. However, I think it is on mine. What I am claiming is that they have added interest on to the Fee. Is that enough to claim for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4591 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...