Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Olden v Barclays Bank


olden
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5987 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank god my hearing is in my local court, I just hope that they get around to changing the date!!

 

Best thing is have a long soak in the bath and get yourself off to bed.

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

bit late, site down i think.

well done val,you must be well knackered,

what a massive hurdle you and jenny must have got over today.

not just court,but all the work leading up to it,knowing the chances of winning at this moment were smaller than a mini clerk.

dont bother rattling tonight, have good nights rest.

talk over weekend,find something to rant about,plus get full story.

tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Val, it was lovely to meet you yesterday... it was as if we have known each other for years! I dont think I could have gone through with the hearing without you, thanks so much for being my 'court buddy'. What a long journey you had getting home, you must have been exhausted. I went back to work, but could not concentrate, it was a strange feeling, as if a weight had been lifted off me (and I did sink quite a few vodkas last night! ). It was good that we could have a few laughs during and after the hearing.. that guy butterbean was really nice too and when the HSBC solicitor said she wanted costs and the judge rolled his eyes and said that they were not appropriate! Im reliving the part when I put my hand up to speak, I remember looking at my hand in the air thinking and what are you going to say as brain had gone blank... I did say something to which the judge seemed to agree, but I cannot recollect now what it was! It was a sort out out of body experience! So glad we met, and dont forget if you need any help with anything... and ebay!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jenny, yes I agree, it is a strange thing when you think about it, a bit wierd really getting to speak on line as it were and then meeting up and finding that you have a lot in common, i could not have gone through it without you, it was really good supporting each other its true strength in numbers ! , I would not have had the confidence to speak otherwise. I couldn't hear HSBC solicitor properly at that time she spoke very quietly maybe ashamed? (alright maybe I'm going deaf ?) did she actually ask for the costs? I had difficulty hearing that bit. butterbean was hoping she would, he was going straight to the press if she had. I asked about the bus to Chepstow and was sent all over the place up and down the entire bus station, nobody who worked there seemed to know, eventually someone did and said no you have to catch a bus to Newport and then change to stagecoach bus service to Chepstow, which I did and the best bit is FREE first time I've ever used my bus pass thought it was great horrible travel but cheaper than my car ( 27miles a gallon) I might have to get used to the bus!! I got home at 4oclock. anyway I am glad we met and we will keep in touch, I hope to sort out the ebay things I have to take photos first and then learn how to post on line, I do a lot of printing photos, but I have never sold on ebay. I think I will stop now as its another late night, val xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done jenny,

i was going to say last night,,,(,because you werent on site)that you might be on the pop.(then seen you posted early hours.)well deserved.

tez

really pleased ,that you met up and got on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you carry on bab.

all the gory details.

did you travel on your own!!!?

you dont read old enough to have bus pass.

honestly dont know how some of these judges sleep at night.

im no lefty,but its about time,what i would call ordinary people,who live in the same world as ordinary folk were given some of these positions.

not being condescending to "ordinary folk" im one.

tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK tez you asked for it, hope you don't regret it!!

 

Well we survived the hearing, but no luck with the stay, no surprise there then, met up with Jenny, which was great, we both felt so nervous, it really helped being in it together, jenny did brilliantly, I even surprised myself that I could speak! only 3 of us turned up out of 5, the third was a chap from the sites alias butterbean his case was against HSBC, and behind us in court were 4 legal trainees from the university, and a man with Bs solicitor who she referred to as ' a mini clerk' ! ( if I got that right) HSBCs solicitor was there and ours both female (young girls) we arrived at 10am, the judge was late due to another case took longer than expected, and our case finished at 1 oclock! Not the 10mins they told us then. there was a tremendous amount of legal jargon, the judge explained the impending OFT case to us in full! we each had our turn to speak and to be fair the judge seemed to be symathetic, the banks solicitors had their turn, and this time (just our luck) made a meal of it, finally the judge summed up and made his decision, we already knew that because he told us at the start! we had all asked for the conditions in the alternative to be adhered to, but he refused that as well.

 

The judge told us that even if we got the stay lifted and eventually got a hearing, we wouln’t get a date until next year and probably after the OFT case, even then if we won that case, we would not get our money, because nothing is being paid out until the ultimate decision is made. The case in January will only be the beginning, as which ever side wins will appeal so it probably goes to the House of Lords and it may even go as far as Europe so it could take 1-2 years before it finishes.

Judge Hickenbottom was very considerate of the fact that we are nervous, when he finished his address, he asked each one in turn to speak, it isn’t as bad as you think, just speak out, he seemed understanding. He asked if we wanted to withdraw the application since there was no advantage one way or the other now that they will not pay out anyway, and gave us 10 minutes to decide he left the room so we could discuss it amongst ourselves. I decided to withdraw my application but asked if the conditions could be applied mainly for me to have the penalty charges stopped until the outcome of test case, he asked barclays solicitor and she she went on and on about the cost to Barclays would be far too much as they would have to check accounts manually, (surely this was confirmation of the main point she more or less admitted automated penalties cost very little?) The Judge was not impressed by this, but in the end he did not agree to apply the conditions.

 

When the Bs solicitor was giving her boring long speal, she referred to my personal status of my overdraft, that I had £1000 in my overdraft account, I am not incurring penalties ! my hand went up (so did my hackles) , the judge said I would have my chance to respond later. When I did I said "Your honour ever since I began this claim in January this year I have constantly been moving money into this account from 0% credit cards, in an effort to prevent these penalty charges and that to the present day, means that my debt now stands at £8000. With the current account £4000 (overdraft limit £5000) NatWest A& L and MBNA credit cards. If I hadn’t done this the account would be over the limit by £4000" + thousands of charges!!! I also said "I am 67 years old and my Husband is 72 years old and we have had this account with Bs for about 45 years and it wasn’t until we retired in 2003 on a pension that we began incurring these penalty charges " I misguidedly thought that would put Bs to shame. Was this an attempt to make the judge think I am not suffering hardship? I know that by the end of next week the payments due out will mean that I will be up to or over the limit once again, and looking for somewhere to move money again. I will be lucky to pay off the cards in time before the promotion dates are up on the different cards, this is how it snowballs.

 

That guy butterbean was really nice too, the poor chap had travelled all the way from Tenby, wife had just had their first child so his wife was not working, he had a £12,000 debt and HSBC had closed his account that day, so he is left high and dry and he is also on the default register, etc.. and when Judge Hicky asked if the banks were looking for costs for today, Barclays said they were not, but the HSBC solicitor said she wanted costs, and the judge rolled his eyes and said that they were not appropriate! Butterbean, told us after he hoped she had asked him for costs, he couldn’t pay but he thought he would go straight to the press. There is some sort of rule at present throughout this process that is supposed to be preventing the banks from closing accounts. He showed Judge Hicky the letter he had today from HSBC solicitors, also they threatened to send the debt collectors to his door. the banks have also been intimidating people with constant phone calls on the weekends demanding money, cancelling cards and cheque books.

We achieved nothing other than the invaluable experience of a court hearing, the judge understood that we had missed out getting our money as he agreed that before the announcement Bs were paying out, he would be writing to us with reasons for turning us down after he had heard a few more cases by next week. He did say something about the letter being a benefit to us.

 

This means that as much as I don’t want to say it, I think all this work to uplift the stays is now pointless. I suggest you just sit back and wait and watch the OFT case.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

gee no need to buy sunday paper.lol

joking apart,always thought your right about stays.

a lot of work individually.

you would not have met jenny though,so something good came from it.

the bit about letter from judge helping,think ive read that before,but not seen resulting letter.gets you thinking what it could possibly contain to help you.interesting perhaps .just watching strickly come dancing result program with opera singers.absolutely brilliant.

tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Val, what a brill account of our hearing... what more can I say other than when you told the judge you were 67 he looked up as to say, never! (and I agree you look fab for your age!)

 

The cases he referred to were something like (and if anyone can interpret them, please feel free)

Bearing

Carslyle

Harris v HSBC - Ian Hughes

Crossdale

 

Thats points in the banks submission carried more weight than others.

 

In particular there was not much weight to their submission on having to manually administer our accounts to the consideration of stopping bank charges and that the comment "Heavy finanical burden to the banks" did not go down well with Judge Hickinbottom.;)

I told him that Thomas Hickey (b's lit team)had told me in June that b's would be settling in full end of July, but when I rang mid July (before the announcement) Thomas had completely changed his tune and almost denied what he had said. I managed to add that it was as if the banks had had prior notice to the test case. Judge H agreed that barclays were settling claims before the announcement of the test case and that it was unfortunate for us that we had to wait so long for our court dates.

Judge H took a lot of time checking the banking code and want to know more from B's solicitor (Miss Hilly ?) about what was in place for hardship cases.

Anyway, I look forward to receiving his reasons via letter next week which hopefully as he said, will be to our benefit.

Also, we can still apply to lift the stay at anytime.

 

Jenny

ps

I now have 3 sets of bundles in my possession, if anyone is in dire need.. let me know and I will send you one of mine (free of charge of course)

Link to post
Share on other sites

tez you are so right I am glad I met Jenny and then theres you :D you are so funny :D I can't wait to see whats in judges letter . yes good old Brucie I switch between that and XFactor all the time. val

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks jenny, To tell the truth I thought he might take age into account and feel so sorry for me he would lift the stay ! and order Bs to give me my money!!

 

just remembered jen i think the thing you said to the judge when you raised your hand was that bit about the fact that Bs won't go to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Val if he was able to he would have.. but what was it Miss Hilly turned to us and said, something to the effect that if we managed to get the stay lifted then b's would just keep on appealing and therefore no hearing prior to test case... coz I said to her that b's would not actually come to court to defend, they would pay out as they would not want to disclose anything before the test case.... bits keep coming back to me!!

So glad its over though, but im not looking forward to tomorrow... Im appearing in court again as a witness!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again

welldoneps3.gif

you two, thanks for posting all the gory details, it has given me a good idea of what to expect when I go to my hearing (which I do not expect to win ) but you tried and will not have to worry about what if....... as Saintly has pointed out. you both have my greatest admiration and respect. regards Stone

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you stone, but we couldnt have gone through with it without all the support from you, saintly, tezl and everyone else on this wonderful site that has given us advice and support... to you and everyone else a million thanks yous!!!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi jenny,

and you was worried about what you would say.

you done brill and got respect from dj.from look of it.

mind he sounded like bit of a smoothie complementing val like that.

you obviously never tried the destitute look then.lol

lets hope theres a bit of a sting in the tail for bs in this letter.

tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you stone, but we couldnt have gone through with it without all the support from you, saintly, tezl and everyone else on this wonderful site that has given us advice and support... to you and everyone else a million thanks yous!!!:)

 

I second that :) every word Jenny, this is something I could never have faced alone, thanks once again to all of you. val xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stone and thanks for that :D Did you get your hearing date changed yet? also I wrote to that BBC programme and they never answered me at all, hope they got some good cases on there, must remember to watch that val

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jenny, all the best for the court case on Tuesday, I don't think you have anything to worry about, you are probably going to be the most experienced one there now, no judge or solicitors will phase you :)

val xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The cases he referred to were something like (and if anyone can interpret them, please feel free)

Bearing

Carslyle

Harris v HSBC - Ian Hughes

Crossdale

 

Thats points in the banks submission carried more weight than others.

 

 

I can't find the case anywhere. Can you remember roughly what did was said about it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't find the case anywhere. Can you remember roughly what did was said about it?

 

Hi Ice Maiden, Oldens correct with that one... but the others, I was trying to write them down as the Judge said them and only managed the first name didnt get the V soandso!! sorry.... but he didnt explain anything about the cases other than mention them which was for the guy with us 'Butterbean' v HSBC - the Judge got the cases photocopied for him to take home and read! You might have more luck if you try and source out Butterbean in the HSBC forum.. sorry but my shorthand is rubbish!:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...