Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
    • I'm really trying, but worst case I can't find what are my options?
    • John Lewis' Privacy Notice states that their CCTV Systems does not use facial recognition or collect biometric data - so I assume it should be fine?    Thank you a lot for your reply. I've scheduled my first therapy session ne t week. Really the time to turn my life around..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax credits, can anybody help please?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've got a bit of an ongoing battle with child tax credits at the moment.

 

Back in 2005, I filled out my declaration and returned it within a couple of days. Fast forward to January 2006, when I recieved a letter saying my credits were going to stop as I hadn't given them all the information.

 

When I initially rung them, as soon as the threat to stop the money, the very (un) helpful lady told me that she couldn't tell me what information they needed, but that if I didn't provide it, I would have to pay the money back. As we didn't know what they needed, and after trying to work through the problem with various call centre staff, my credits were stopped for 4 months, and we had to put in a new claim.

 

Tax credits are now claiming back the FULL amount for the year, including the money they didn't pay as they had stopped my money.

 

Throughout the past year and a half I've lodged an appeal (which found in their favour, athough it took over a year for them to get back to me). In the meantime, I've been told by two representatives that they have all the information needed for that period, and that I needn't worry. One even gave me date from my file with a note saying it was all OK. This note has now mysteriously disappeared from my file?

 

I've requested all the information from them that they hold on my file. Tax credits sent out everything for every year, except the year in dispute.

 

I'm at a loss. I was entitled to the money for that year, I've done everything I can to rectify the situation, but keep getting misleading inforamtion as to what I need to give them. The latest one is that I ticked a box saying I needed to give more information, but I'm sure I didn't, and have religiously informed them by phone of every change in circumstances.

 

As it stands now, I've said take me to court. I asked for details of their complaints procedure and Ombudsman so I can escalate my complaint, but the 'team leader' said he couldn't give me that information? I'm terrifed about the possibility of going to court, but at the same time so sick of having to deal with this department which just won't listen of help in any way!

 

Any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry to hear that you are another victim of HMRC, the staff oon the helpline are deliberately undertrained, that is they know very little about the system or what they can do to help;

You could also try your local tax office, take everything with you, also have the address for the customer Support unit which sometimes get results,

Mr Paul Gray,

Chairman of HMRC

St Marys House, St Marys Street

Preston

PR4 AT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take my advice, I work there, don't even bother claiming in the first instance, the entire place is a joke. From the highest level downwards not one person gives a damn. I'm ashamed to admit I'm part of it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tommy are you legally obliged to reply to your yearly renewal?

Every year when I get mine it says we owe them and it will be deducted from this years award, which is only £500 and they reckon we owe £1800 so we are not going to get anything for the next 3 years.

I'm so fed up with them that I have'nt replied especially as my present job means I get paid a different amount each month I can't see them getting it right at all so can't face explaining it all.

Will it matter if I don't bother?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you have to declare your income every year even if they say you owe them. As for your income it would have to fluctuate by 10's of thousands to make any difference to your award. I take it by the amount you are supposed to receieve your entitlement is the least that can be awarded. For you to have an overpayment your change of circumstances would have had to be hugh. The only thing I can think of is that when you called to report a change of circumstance, a change in maybe your income,due to a gremlin within hmrc computer system, this overpayment occured. It's not your fault this is happening to every other customer and for reasons that escape me they (hmrc) cant seem to fix it.

 

 

Without knowing the specifics I cant say how your overpayment occured, you could pm me and maybe I could advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks tommy

The overpayment was 5 years ago £1400 which i refused to recieve (sent in giros) but they said I had to accept it as giros already issued. Since then every year it goes up!!

I will tell them my income then but just think what's the point .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hiya

 

I totally understand what they are putting you through...I have been a victim myself, especially of staff actually reading notes outto you and then they vanish! Don't know if this will help but I am trying it just now.

 

Apparently there is a form called a TC648, which is to get a report on unauthorised computer access for your case. I assume this is when someone accesess and or/alters your records etc - maybe this will throw a few things up? Maybe worth a shot to get proof things have changed/vanished/went astray, try asking the helpline for one to be sent to you.

 

Best of luck!

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about issuing them with a S.A.R. They legally have to supply you with all the details then, don't they?

 

The whole system is a joke... it should be assessed on what your income is NOW (much like income support and JSA) not what you think your income will be for the next year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told about 2 years ago that I had been overpaid tax credits (altho they have never taken these overpayments back) I am sure that when I was told about recovering overpayments that they could or would only be able to take about (if i remember correctly) something in the region of about 20% per week OFF your tax credits weekly until your overpayments had been paid off so that infact you would still receive your tax credits weekly albeit with the 20% taken off also.

 

Also like someone else has stated the payments should be on up to date income, I am self employed and being paid on my last years accounts, now after having a much better year financially I am due to give these details to tax credit people by the end of this month and I'm worried about how much I have now been overpaid and god knows how long it will take to pay off.

24th August 2006 Template letter to Argos demanding late payment fee of 17.50 is returned.

 

Argos late payment fee of £17.50 is returned.

 

22nd Nov £5 late payment fee returned by BT.

 

Virgin credit card 2* £12 overlimit fees, LBA issued early Nov..... awaiting news

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re "As it stands now, I've said take me to court...I'm terrifed about the possibility of going to court, but at the same time so sick of having to deal with this department which just won't listen of help in any way!"

 

My advice is, don't whatever you do go to court at their insistence (different if you get legal aid and bring your own case). Check this forum to see why:

 

[EDIT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Hello, I am having the same problem with HMRC.

I claim Child Tax Credits, and my eldest son has left college, which I told them, my husband then rang and told them, when the form came back to us it still had my eldest son's name on, we both rang again and told them and they just seemed like the couldn't care less.

I have since wrote a letter to them and sent it recorded delivery, but still nothing, and don't know how much more I can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zippyslippers,

 

I think CTC continue for a period following a childs college period. - possibly 6 months?

 

My partner had to pay back a sum for overpayment of CTC for her daughter, these payments did continue after daughter left the college. The daughter is now 23 years old and still receive yearly notices that partner is entitled to CTC! Turn over the page and the calculated entitlement is zero!

 

How do we get off the system!!! We telephone them and they say "you may become a guardian of a child so will be entitled to CTC"

 

Good luck,

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...