Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pc Games - Return For Store Credit Denied


Stethomas
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

Christmas Eve I bought my girlfriend a couple of games for her PC, Sims 2 Christmas edition £32.99 and Sims Hot Date £9.99. As it turned out these games were unsuitable and therefore never opened. We had just moved house and these games went missing for a while. 5 months later, having no recipt I took them back to PC world in exchange for a store credit and was refused.

 

Is there anything I can do about this or I am just stuck with the games now, please advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless the items were faulty, the retailer has no obligation to either refund or exchange. Sorry :(

 

 

 

EDIT: Why were they unsuitable, btw? Sims is a great game, though version 1 is a little outdated now (dedicated Simmer) ;)

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can provide a proof of purchase eg card statement, then you are entitled to store credit if the products are in a saleable condition. a manager cannot tell you otherwise.

 

No, I disagree.

 

A retailer is under no obligation to take anything back unless it is faulty or was mis-sold, not as described etc.

 

Changing your mind (even about a gift) does not give you any legal entitlement to a refund, store credit, or swap whatsoever.

 

This doesn't apply to mail order purchases, however, where the Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations *do* allow you to return (almost) anything for any reason, providing you let the retailer know within 7 days.

 

A store may have a policy which goes beyond this. Game, for instance, allow you to return a Game within 10 days if you don't like it, presumably whether it is played or not - but this is over and above your statutory rights, and is down to the individual retailer(s) to set policy on.

 

PCW may have a policy which "entitles" you to a store credit - but even so, I think "5 months and no receipt" is probably stretching the boundaries even of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasnt quoting any law as such. If you can provide proof of purchase and have the items that are unopened, im sure you can get yourself a credit voucher from PCW.

 

Sorry for the misunderstanding, didnt mean it to sound like a legal thing at all. Just ive faced the same thing before and its a grey area really. Customer has bought something and hasnt opened it, and its still in saleable condition...should you take it back? generally i do to give good customer service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After that period of time I would doubt any store would even give a credit, especially without proof of purchase. Perhaps take them to game or similar to trade in, you may get an element of your money back? Are they still sealed in cellophane?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasnt quoting any law as such. If you can provide proof of purchase and have the items that are unopened, im sure you can get yourself a credit voucher from PCW.

 

Sorry for the misunderstanding, didnt mean it to sound like a legal thing at all. Just ive faced the same thing before and its a grey area really. Customer has bought something and hasnt opened it, and its still in saleable condition...should you take it back? generally i do to give good customer service.

 

I see where you are coming from, but if you word something to say "you are entitled to", it reads that you have a God-given legal right to something, and in this case it patently isn't true.

 

It is down to the discretion of the store, or even the exact person you deal with, sometimes.

 

It is good that you do - but in a market where goods decrease in value (eg technology) you'd go out of business quite quickly if you allowed people to return anything they liked for whatever reason after 5-6 months. A piece of hardware or game costing ~£50 can be worth 50% of this in a short space of time, as it gets replaced by something newer and better quite quickly. If you allow your customers to return these things and get a credit at their initial purchase price, what on earth do you do to recover the difference between the products original and current value?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats where there is a thin line between business ethics and good customer service.

 

for example pc world who's flagship stores have targets of 100k a day on saturdays and sundays - they can afford to take a hit of £5 - £10 on a product if they are issuing gift vouchers which have to be spent within the company and also re-issuing the product onto the shop floor at the correct price. they get a returning customer, and hopefully a happy customer which is better than an unhappy customer and loss of trade!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is usually a certain amount of leeway but defiantly not 5 months, most retailers will tell you to take a hike after that amount of time. Its also the product thats being returned, pc games. When it comes to pc software even sealed its a little iffy, especially over a lengthy period of time, I know argos will only accept back software sealed within 10 days when its brought off its website/phone ONLY.

Different company I know, if you can find some for of proof or purchase you can try emailing there customer services line, however they don't have to offer you anything, and they know it.

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blitz I'm sure you are me 5 years ago - I too was a CS student whilst working at Argos! :D only just actually read your signature lol!

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"on a product".

 

Yes, on a single product.

 

But if word got around that this was now "policy" (or worse still, law) and everyone started taking stuff back "just because they felt like it", the stores would start taking losing money hand over fist.

 

I'd be straight into the stores at the start of the clothing season, buying anything that I kinda like the look of, then take back all the stuff 5 months later that I didn't fancy wearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"on a product".

 

Yes, on a single product.

 

But if word got around that this was now "policy" (or worse still, law) and everyone started taking stuff back "just because they felt like it", the stores would start taking losing money hand over fist.

 

I'd be straight into the stores at the start of the clothing season, buying anything that I kinda like the look of, then take back all the stuff 5 months later that I didn't fancy wearing.

 

no no it will never be policy or law but thats the way i think managers will look at these issues...if they can get the customer to spend again in the store what harm is that at the cost of a fiver or so. again its down to the discretion of the manager in this case but if it was me and i was serving Stethomas then i would probably tell him to come back with proof of purchase and i would issue vouchers..no probs....when you come to PC's and expensive items ...then obviously the cost factor comes into mind...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Good morning, please help.

 

I have only found the receipt, it dates back to the 24/12/2006. Will PC now have to issue me with a store credit by law or is it down to the decision of the person who serves me.

 

Thank you again everyone, this site and the people who use it are so helpful.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, as I said to you above - the store has no obligation whatsoever to give you anything, refund or store credit, for these games. They're not faulty. It is completely up to the manager whether or not he gives you credit, and frankly, after five months, even if the software is unopened, I doubt he would. I'm sorry - it's just not in the business' interest to do so, and unfortunately most managers think of the business first.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only hop you have is if there is a contractual agreement - i.e, a specifi refund policy that allows you to take goods back for whatever reason stated and within the timeframe given.

 

Failing that, and failing that there is nothing wrong with the goods (i.e, they conform to the contract) then you really have no leg to stand on. It will be the generosity of the store that you are relying on, and frankly, they would be rather generous in allowing a refund or even exchange.

 

If you really do not want it, why not use it as a present for someone or sell it? AT least something will come of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
thats where there is a thin line between business ethics and good customer service.

 

wish people would stop using the words customer service in instances like this it is this sort of attitude that makes people think the are entitled to stuff like this.

 

for all the manager or the store knows the product was just stolen from another "games software" store and now being returned to his store, with no proof of purchase u dont know where it came from, when it was bought, how much was paid for it etc.

 

refunding it is not good customer service, if the manager did it it would be outstanding ridiculous over the top ludicrous customer service.

 

people encouraging things like this is whats wrong with the world soon we will british will be like the americans and trying to sue MaccyDs for making us fat rather than realising that we are fat coz we decided to eat all the pies not beacuse someone made us grrr...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...