Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice needed please. Got a final notice.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if anyone can help please. We have debts and have been to the CCCS where they gave us advice and a payment plan which we sent to every creditor with an offer of monthly payments. all were accepted exept the Nationwide credit card who only agreed reduced payments for 3 months.The 3 months are now up and we had a call from them saying we had to revert to the orig minimum payment terms which we just cant manage. They were quite unhelpful and threatened to make us sell the house. Yoday we have had a letter from a debt collection agancy saying they need an acceptable offer or start legal action which may lead to 'the forced sale of your home' We cant make them any better offer than we made the Nationwide. The joke is that even if they forced the sale of the house they would not revover the money as we have considered selling ourselves but as we have a mortgage and secured loan on it there would be very little capitol from it so it is not really worth doing.

The aamount we owe is less than 5000 and we have another credit card with much higher balance on which the small payments are still being accepted. It just seems the Nationwide are not prepared to help.

 

By getting this letter from the debt agency does this mean they have passed the loan on, should we still be trying to liase with the Nationwide as well as contacting the debt agency? Any advice would be great, Im feeling sick today after opening the letter. Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend of mine was in a similar situation to yours and all his creditors accepted reduced payments except for Nationwide, they took him to court :( and now have an interim charging order on his property, they seem satisfied with that and don't hassle him (at the present time anyway and its been a fair few months!) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a conversation with the Natiowide. They are not prepared to help at all. I have told them that there is a secured loan on the house which would eat all the equity should the court force a sale. I have told them I am prepared to file for bankrupcy if there is no other option. I have explained that I am quite prepared to keep paying the monthly payment I can afford which is £30 and also that I will increase this should I be able to. They only offer of help was to say that if I can find £400 in the next 7 days they will hold off for a month (thats impossible and will only delay the action anyway) or , if I can find £2000 they will take it in full and final settlement. If I could find £2000 I would not be in this position in the first place. Its a joke, if they take us to court the debt will increase and there is even less chance of them getting the money but they dont seem to want to know. Any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice is to go back to your advisor at the CCCS and see if they can help.

 

If nothing else they can put pressure on them to accept a lower amount every month, on the basis that your other creditors have done so.

 

I personally would not waste my time talking to Nationwide on the 'phone. They are only likely to say "anything" to get you to pay, as opposed to actually helping you sort this out.

 

Good Luck

 

:)

2007 Issues ALL RESOLVED

2008 Issues ALL RESOLVED

£4,200 in charges claimed back succesfully from a total of 5 Creditors

2009 Issues ALL RESOLVED

NEXT Directory - No Agreement, No Further Action **WON**

2010 Issues

Court Claim from Black Horse - AOS 22.11.10, CPR 23.11.10

Assisting Daughter with Employment Tribunal for Wrongful Dismissal/Discrimination

 

:) My Head is officially out of the Sand :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to my friend, they were very unhelpful with their problem despite PayPlan's help, they just wouldn't listen, seems to me like they do the same to everybody. I think my friend did attend court for the Charging Order, but Nationwide have left them alone since as they know if they sell the house they will get their money, provided of course there's any equity there for them to have, I also think it was for a much bigger debt than yours. In the end, they can't have what you haven't got :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a charging on my house from the Nationwide years ago, and when it come to remortgaging I agreed a short settlement with them about 3 years after th eorder was made. It was for about £8.5K and they never added interest after judgement.

 

My advice to you would to be to CCA & SAR them in preparation to defend the court action they will statagainst you. Have you claimed back charges from these people?

 

If you have a bank account with Nationwide, please change it asap, as they wil ltake your income as soon as it goes into the account leaving you with nothing other than a fight on your hands to get it back.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all the replies. Im not sure I understand the last one about the SAR gizmo. We dont bank with Nationwide and dont have any late payment charges on the account so do I need to do this. I dont understand what we would be defending, we doe owe the money. The other thing is that the debt is in my partners name and the house is in joint names so does this have any bearing on it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To get a charging order they first need to get a CCJ, then a charging order nisi (nisi is latin for unless so basically this means we will grant a charging order unless you pay the debt) and then a charging order absolute. You can defend this right from the CCJ stage. Successfully defended they can forget about getting a charging order. That is why the CCA request is important.

If they can not provide a CCA the debt, although it still exists, is not enforceable. While a debt is unenforceable if properly argued (as judges are sometimes not up to speed on consumer credit agreements - so you need to point it out to them) a CCJ can not lawfully be granted.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...