Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road.  After coming off the motor way i noticed my car felt a little "weird" so i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intollerant on date night, so we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i havent recieved anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. SHould i query the ticket as i dont want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep queit. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OFT debt collection guidance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3306 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am not sure that the OFT would be interested in this, although I certainly would not pay any unsubstantiated extra charges. Who is the DCA ?

 

The OFT are usually very interested in breaches of its own guidance.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The OFT are usually very interested in breaches of its own guidance.

 

The OFT rarely if ever act on individual complaints like this, they will refer you to the CAB.

 

http://oft.gov.uk/contactus#.UdSecfnVCHQ

 

The OFT cannot provide advice or assistance to individual consumers or traders. If you require consumer advice, information on specific consumer rights or wish to make a consumer complaint against a trader, please visit http://www.adviceguide.org.uk or call the Citizens Advice consumer helpline on 08454 04 05 06.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry just read the post you were referring to, the OFT would not be interested anyway because it is not a regulated activity to collect vets bills.:roll:

Edited by Dodgeball

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
OFT refers payday lending market to Competition Commission

http://oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2013/45-13

 

'The review has found evidence of widespread non-compliance with the law and guidance across the sector and at every stage in the life-cycle of loans.'

http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/credit...liance-review/

 

oft update http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/credit/payday-lenders-compliance-review/#.Uffit5F0Ziw

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

It MUST be remembered that THE OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING IS NOT JUST ABOUT CCA 1974 REGULATED MATTERS!!

 

There are dedicated teams dealing with a multitude of trading areas.

 

It is nonsense to state that the OFT would not be interested is this type of case.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It MUST be remembered that THE OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING IS NOT JUST ABOUT CCA 1974 REGULATED MATTERS!!

 

There are dedicated teams dealing with a multitude of trading areas.

 

It is nonsense to state that the OFT would not be interested is this type of case.

 

The OP can try them if they like, but they will just be referred to the CAB, they have no interest in the collection of vets bills, unless there is credit involved of course.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taken from here:

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/faqs/#.UgOUJW1dBm8

 

"What can't you do?

 

We cannot:

 

  • act on behalf of individuals
  • help or intervene in individual disputes
  • advise if a business is being investigated
  • tell you if a trader is good or bad
  • tell you which trader you should use
  • help you to get your money back
  • comment on whether a specific contract or situation is unfair
  • help with academic research
  • comment on studies we are doing beyond what we have said in our public statements, or
  • take enforcement action without a breach of specific legislation.

Back to top

Why can't you get involved in individual disputes?

 

We are bound by the powers given to us in legislation. For example, Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (OPSI website) restricts the OFT to enforcing legislation only where there has been a breach that affects the collective interests of consumers (see paragraph 9.2 of the Enterprise Act guidelines published by the OFT).

This means that we don't have the powers to get involved in your individual dispute. However, there are people who may be able to help you. For more information, see 'Where can I get advice about a problem I'm having with a particular business?' below.

Although the OFT is unable to act on your behalf, we can act to protect a large number of consumers throughout the UK

 

Where can I get advice about a problem I'm having with a particular business?

 

You can get advice from Citizens Advice consumer service. The Citizens Advice consumer service provides free, confidential and impartial advice on consumer issues. Visit www.adviceguide.org.uk - making a complaint or call the Citizens Advice consumer helpline on 08454 04 05 06."

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taken from here:

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/faqs/#.UgOUJW1dBm8

 

"What can't you do?

 

We cannot:

 

  • act on behalf of individuals
  • help or intervene in individual disputes
  • advise if a business is being investigated
  • tell you if a trader is good or bad
  • tell you which trader you should use
  • help you to get your money back
  • comment on whether a specific contract or situation is unfair
  • help with academic research
  • comment on studies we are doing beyond what we have said in our public statements, or
  • take enforcement action without a breach of specific legislation.

Back to top

Why can't you get involved in individual disputes?

 

We are bound by the powers given to us in legislation. For example, Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (OPSI website) restricts the OFT to enforcing legislation only where there has been a breach that affects the collective interests of consumers (see paragraph 9.2 of the Enterprise Act guidelines published by the OFT).

This means that we don't have the powers to get involved in your individual dispute. However, there are people who may be able to help you. For more information, see 'Where can I get advice about a problem I'm having with a particular business?' below.

Although the OFT is unable to act on your behalf, we can act to protect a large number of consumers throughout the UK

 

Where can I get advice about a problem I'm having with a particular business?

 

You can get advice from Citizens Advice consumer service. The Citizens Advice consumer service provides free, confidential and impartial advice on consumer issues. Visit www.adviceguide.org.uk - making a complaint or call the Citizens Advice consumer helpline on 08454 04 05 06."

 

Yes thank Davyly, thought that this was common knowledge, but it is good to see it in writing. They must have gotten fed up with people making inappropriate complaints and decided to clarify the position once and for all.

 

I wonder if it will do any good ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

for (oldish) reference

 

'Please note that references to mental capacity in the irresponsible lending guidance have now been superseded by the Mental Capacity guidance for creditors.' oft

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/consultations/oft1373.pdf

http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/legal-powers/legal/cca/mental-capacity-guidance/

http://www.walkermorris.co.uk/business-insights/short-guide-5-oft%E2%80%99s-mental-capacity-guidance

etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

'The OFT has refused to renew the consumer credit licences of debt purchaser HFO Capital Limited, and two associated debt collectors, HFO Services Limited and Roxburghe (UK) Limited.'

'The OFT found evidence of misleading and unfair practices in the businesses' operations, including:

  • sending debt collection letters which misrepresented debtors' legal position
  • misleading and otherwise inappropriate behaviour by HFO and Roxburghe agents during phone calls to debtors
  • failing to properly investigate disputed debts
  • failure to respond appropriately to the concerns of regulators, including the OFT.'

http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2014/08-14

 

'The OFT's consumer credit team currently has 32 investigations open into firms which intelligence suggests are engaged in unfair practices or may be otherwise unfit to hold a licence.'

 

it can pay to send info to the relevant authorities, albeit maybe short term.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Thread started for you in Debt Collection Agencies forum davyboy.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

FCA recent warnings re unauthorised/clone firms targeting uk (see FCA news);

 

Ronney Loan services

Stanford Barclay

King Edward / Brightstar Financial Limited (clone) (clone of FCA registered firm)

Cruiser Trading Co Ltd (clone of FCA authorised firm)

Migham Credit Finance Limited

Gilmoore Financial

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?409-FCA-Unauthorised-firms-and-individuals-to-avoid

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...