Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ebay return issue...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6203 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought an exercise bike off ebay a few months ago that turned up in unuseable condition. Couldn't afford to have it returned at the time and the seller is rather difficult, so I'm not sure how likely they are to accept it back at this time.

 

I'm under the impression that they have some legal requirement to cough up a refund as the bike turned up damaged? They are most definitely a business trader. Is this right, and if so, what could I include in a letter accompanying my return to make sure they comply?

 

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sale of Goods Act would apply if the sale is a business sale, but you really needed to have made the seller aware of the problem straight after the sale. A court would wonder why you took so long if the goods were delivered in poor condition, and you've allowed the trader an argument against you now that the goods were delivered fine.

 

I would still suggest you write to the trader, explaining why you have not contacted him previously, and state that the bike is not of satisfactory quality or fit for its purpose (and I assume also not as described?) and therefore does not comply with the terms of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended).

 

However too much time has passed to be legally entitled to reject the bike for a full refund. You are really looking at the cost of repair or replacement with a bike of the same value - unless of course this would actually be more expensive than a refund.

 

If repair or replacement is disproportionate (too costly) you are then looking at rescission of the contract which is a partial refund to allow for any wear and tear you could have had from the bike. You'd need to press for a full refund bearing in mind you've not had it long and it came in that condition, ultimately only a judge could award this.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted the seller immediately. They took ages to reply to each message and eventually sent me a returns form. They knew I could not afford to send it back and would not help any further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't put in terms to state that you are liable for returning faulty goods, such a term would be unfair and unenforceable.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We deal on eBay a lot. Most decent suppliers on there will arrange to collect a faulty item. Some smaller firms though , you have to realise, deal through the post office and have no facility to collect goods, and so expect the buyer to return faulty goods to them, and then they will refund the postage.

 

Normal time limit for refunds due to faulty goods on arrival is a maximum of two weeks to return the goods.....

 

If it's been several months... Sorry but I think you are fighting an uphill battle.

 

Too late now, but you could have claimed a refund from Paypal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did try to claim a refund from paypal, they ruled in the seller's favour.

It cannot have been a small firm as they sell large items of equipment and a lot of them. they said I was responsible for all postage costs and that they would not refund them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

f**k eBay, f**k PayPal.. let the seller has his/hers money

 

ebay and PayPal wont support you, they cant enforce their own terms for goodness sake...

 

I presume you have the sellers address, go through the small claims route... the seller would not be able to win the case if the details you have stated is correct. When they lose the case they have to pay you for your costs too.

 

What i would do if you have not done so is return (post) the bike asking for a refund, if they refuse thats good... just if you went to court saying they wouldnt refund you but you have the bike then they dont to an extent owe you money

 

 

Ebay is pathetic, once i stuck an affiliate advert in the cars section (i never do this, only once... everyone else does it, why shouldnt i?) the listing fee was expensive, i had it on either 7 or 10 days, within the last 5 minutes (no exageration) they terminated the auction and REFUNDED me the listing costs... considering i wasnt selling an item (like i should have been) it meant the advertisement i stuck in was free... and i got a few people click on it which meant £££ :p Tell me all your ebay/paypal stories, none fo them would surprise me...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't help but notice that no one has answered my question yet :p

I want to write a letter to include with the returned item that will give the clear impression I will not back down if they don't refund me. But I don't want to be abrasive about it, I would like to keep it polite. If theres something to throw in about them being legally obliged to cover the return postage that would be great, but not entirely neccessary. Not looking for a full letter, just some guidelines to help me :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As rosie pointed out, your chances of a satisfactory conclusion diminish as the weeks pass by. You could serve a Small Claims action on the dealer that the goods were not fit for purpose when they were delivered, and either sue for a reduced amount to retain the goos in their inferior condition, of for the full amount you paid, whereupon you'll return the goods at your expense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've just found this whilst searching for info:

 

The business is not entitled to charge for recovery of the goods if the consumer also has a statutory right to cancel the contract under other legislation, (for example because they are defective) or if the term requiring the consumer to return the goods is an ‘‘unfair term’’ within the meaning of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 and The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts (Amendment) Regulations 2001.

 

Can anyone confirm if it is correct? I'm currently composing an email informing the company that they may collect or pay for me to return it, but want to be sure of my rights before sending.

 

Also, do I have any right to claim the original postage cost of the item, or is that gone for good? Seems unfair that any way this turns out I lose money, but I can understand postage costs being unclaimable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was more focused on this part:

 

The business is not entitled to charge for recovery of the goods if the consumer also has a statutory right to cancel the contract under other legislation, (for example because they are defective)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You only had an 'invitation to treat', not a contract with the seller. Actually, you may not have had the treat invitation as this was an auction purchase? If a BIN, then the original point applies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...