Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
    • Sorry my redactions made it harder dx. Tick dates are 11/12/2014
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Taking Cabot to court for failing to supply HSBC CCA + Distress etc


tbern123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Forgive me if I am wrong but if you put without prejudice at the top of the letter sent by yourself this means they cannot present your sent letter in a court of law as evidence? Does this allow you to produce your own copies/ produce the originals as evidence of letters you have sent to them if you need to?

Also how would you go about proving you have sent such a letter? i.e. get post office worker to confirm & sign on a separate sheet held by yourself the contents of that sent by R/D (& give their details) prior to posting by recorded delivery

 

'Without Prejudice' means that neither side can produce the letter or any part of it as evidence in court.

 

It's nigh on impossible to prove the contents of any letter sent in the mail, all you can do is prove a letter was delivered on a certain date. Email may be better if you want to prove the contents but even that is flawed.

  • Haha 1

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Tbern

 

You have been toooo quite lately, what are you brewing up?

 

 

I have been doing some more reading and found an OFT document http://www.oft.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/50F06527-9FC5-4610-B385-999D6E2A8950/0/oft664.pdf

 

in section 2.8 it says

 

 

f. passing on debtor details to debt management companies without the debtors' informed prior consent

Not sure what power this document has but another useful source of info for our pals, a lot of other nuggetrs in here too. Proving the debt before chasing etc.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry everyone been really busy with work and getting Natwest to refund my charges.

 

 

Anyway, as tamadus said

 

'Without Prejudice' means that neither side can produce the letter or any part of it as evidence in court.

 

But the facts I quote in my letters can be used in any possible court case. I.e their failure to comply with a 3 CCA requests, an imporperly executed agreement etc.... I also have the added bonus that their letters are not without prdeejudice and they have made some frankly shocking confessions.

 

I have sent all my correspondence to them via email, it is quick and you can show when they received it and when they actually read it. Might not be admissible in court but you can still show it to the OFT and TS.

 

Anyway, back to my friends at CABOT... Since my last email to them, I have not heard anything... No phone calls and no letters. My guess is they are just playing for time... This is fine with me, they can take as much time as they like. They have alreadly failed to comply with my CCA request and they can't now get Barclaycard to sign the agreement as they have provided me with a copy of the unsigned agreement.

 

I have contacted the ICO and TS, waiting for them both to get back to me. I have also contacted the CRA's asking how one company can register information for another company.

 

Once, I get the responses back... I will decide my next move...

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a thread!

 

Superb, will be watching with interest, as have just received a letter from Cabot over my Barclaycard account.... NIce of them to let me know lol..

 

Mike

 

 

Hello Mike, make sure you start a thread about this..... Make sure you CCA and get a copy of your Barclaycard agreement just in case it is like mine and not signed by Barclaycard.....

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
In the mean time, I thought I would respond to Experian for clarification

 

26 November 2006

 

Credit Expert

PO BOX 7710

Nottingham

NG80 7WE

 

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

Thank you for your recent correspondence, in relation to a default registered on my credit file by Kings Hill (No1) Ltd. You state that you have contacted Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited and they are unable to agree to remove this default from my file.

 

Can you please confirm, why you contacted Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited, when the default is registered by Kings Hill (No1) Limited.

Please can you also confirm, if one limited company can register information on a credit file, on behalf of another company even though each company is registered with the Information Commissioner's Office as a separate Data Controller. Thank you for your time and assistance in relation to this matter, I look forward to receiving your quick response to my concerns.

 

Regards

 

 

 

tbern123

 

I received this response today... Me thinks someone has missed the whole point...

 

From: CreditExpert

 

To: tbern123

 

Subject: EMR1414711X

 

 

 

Our Ref: AIH/40823010/PC

 

 

Dear tbern123

 

 

Thank you for your email, which we received on 26 November 2006.

 

 

I note your comments and I would advise that Kings Hill (No1) Ltd and Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd are part of the same company. The contact details we have for Kings Hill is the Cabot address as stated in our previous letter.

 

 

Kind regards

 

 

 

 

Mr Alan I Hirst

 

Consumer Services Officer

 

CreditExpert

I'll send them a response tomorrow......

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I SAR'd Kingshill and have received zilch and have started action with Information Commissioner on advice of South East Trading Standards. Cabot returned my cheque saying they had already received a payment. Yes they had for info from Cabot. So it was my Kings Hill cheque they had not banked. Presumably so they could say well we're the same company. They just aren't they are two separate companies. Had long converstaion with two different Trading Standards officers and the last one in particular urged me to complain to the Info Comm and said their tactics is of some concern. he also advised anyone with similar problems to complain to them even though they may not act they need to build up a case.

The whole Cabot saga stinks like a pile of rotten kippers.

I have also just discovered that the "thing" they have been trying to tell me is my credit agreement is only the application form so another interesting angle. Debt Mountain I am a bit too far away from Morpeth for your court case but with you all the way...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't flame me for this, but I actually work for Cabot Financial and can tell you that Cabot and Kingshill Limited 1 are the same company. The reason for Cabot also being called Kingshill Limited 1 is because that is the estate that Cabot Financial are based on.

Please note this is not official company policy and I am only posting this as my own personal point of view

S.A.R SENT TO ABBEY 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Please don't flame me for this, but I actually work for Cabot Financial and can tell you that Cabot and Kingshill Limited 1 are the same company. The reason for Cabot also being called Kingshill Limited 1 is because that is the estate that Cabot Financial are based on.

Please note this is not official company policy and I am only posting this as my own personal point of view

 

Firstly thanks for being honest many people repect that.What I would like to know is how are many of the DCA's getting away with being dorment companies when in fact they are trading. Are wetalking here of some sort of tax fraud for example away around Corporation Tax and let's face it if you follow the audit trail it always leads back to a bank:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't flame me for this, but I actually work for Cabot Financial and can tell you that Cabot and Kingshill Limited 1 are the same company. The reason for Cabot also being called Kingshill Limited 1 is because that is the estate that Cabot Financial are based on.

Please note this is not official company policy and I am only posting this as my own personal point of view

 

I'm not flaming you wulfinuk but according to Companies house Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited ( company number 03439445) and Kings Hill (No1) Ltd ( company number 03757424) are seperately registered companies operating from the same address.

 

They are totally seperate companies with seperate data controllers as far as the legalities are concerned whatever you have been told.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'d Kingshill and have received zilch and have started action with Information Commissioner on advice of South East Trading Standards. Cabot returned my cheque saying they had already received a payment. Yes they had for info from Cabot. So it was my Kings Hill cheque they had not banked. Presumably so they could say well we're the same company. They just aren't they are two separate companies. Had long converstaion with two different Trading Standards officers and the last one in particular urged me to complain to the Info Comm and said their tactics is of some concern. he also advised anyone with similar problems to complain to them even though they may not act they need to build up a case.

The whole Cabot saga stinks like a pile of rotten kippers.

I have also just discovered that the "thing" they have been trying to tell me is my credit agreement is only the application form so another interesting angle. Debt Mountain I am a bit too far away from Morpeth for your court case but with you all the way...

 

Asset Link is another very similar set up. Maybe it's time to get some pegs for our noses:D

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't flame me for this, but I actually work for Cabot Financial and can tell you that Cabot and Kingshill Limited 1 are the same company. The reason for Cabot also being called Kingshill Limited 1 is because that is the estate that Cabot Financial are based on.

Please note this is not official company policy and I am only posting this as my own personal point of view

 

Thank you for coming on - line. As you may have read, there are a number of questions regarding your employer many of us would like information on and Messrs Randall, Maynard and Crawford are to say the very least 'interesting characters'.

 

I'm afraid you seem to have been shrouded in the illusion most staff of Cabot have that it's all the same company - something Trading Standards and the Information Commissioner find interesting too - The Cabot empire consists of 15 companies probably more. Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited - who I presume is your employer is owned by a company called Cabot Financial Debt Recovery Services Limited and that company also owns Kingshill No1 Limited. All 3 are seperate Limited companies and so are all the others. If you would care to pm your email address I'll send you all the share certificates outlining the whole group and who owns who, but my friend Tadamus is absolutely correct, although they are not trading through Dormant companies from what I can see, they are all trading seperatly. We can enlighten you.

 

I think before you can answer our concerns and throw light onto their actions you might like to familiarise yourself with our threads and try piecing the jigsaw together because you may, unwittingly and totally innocently be being lured by your masters into all sorts of criminal activities ( not robbing banks of course, but breaking laws which they have taken for granted as being okay because nobody on the outside world knew about them - until tbern, me, debt mountain and a number of others started digging).

 

We really do appreciate you coming on here and whilst it's late just now, I hope you'll come back and help us out a bit later. Perhaps if we put some questions forward you won't take anything personnaly and maybe you'll put some meat on some of our thoughts. Some might get a tad angry at times but please forgive that and take this in good faith that all we want to do is protect the innocent and find our way to better practices which, if you think about it will help companies like Cabot in the long run actually provide a service of quality rather than pick up the reputation it has in the debt purchase market.

 

Thanks again and we'll speak again soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

but my friend Tadamus is absolutely correct, although they are not trading through Dormant companies from what I can see, they are all trading seperatly. We can enlighten you.

 

 

quote]

 

 

Companies House does show some Cabot companies as being dormant. It also shows an almost identical set-up for the Asset Link group of companies. Again with several sitting 'dormant'

 

I'll be starting a thread concerning this crowd at Asset Link just as soon as the final pieces slot into place. I'll leave you lot to Cabet and co. I have a personal interest in Asset Link, and it won't go away until they do :D

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

but my friend Tadamus is absolutely correct, although they are not trading through Dormant companies from what I can see, they are all trading seperatly. We can enlighten you.

 

 

quote]

 

 

Companies House does show some Cabot companies as being dormant. It also shows an almost identical set-up for the Asset Link group of companies. Again with several sitting 'dormant'

 

I'll be starting a thread concerning this crowd at Asset Link just as soon as the final pieces slot into place. I'll leave you lot to Cabet and co. I have a personal interest in Asset Link, and it won't go away until they do :D

 

Okay, okay, Tamadus - give me a break - look at the time I posted !:D

 

actually, with regard to Dormant co's in Cabot lot, you are right, there are dormant ones there although the implication was that they were trading using those names and I had no evidence of that. What our uncovering has done though is made the Information Commissioner and Trading Standards question the Data Protection Act issues of passing data from one to another without our permission and if you are finding that with Asset Link too many comparrisons can be made. I haven't looked into asset Link, but is there any connection between to 2 companies? Directors ?

 

Keep up the good fight my friend, we are all behind you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Okay, okay, Tamadus - give me a break - look at the time I posted !:D

 

actually, with regard to Dormant co's in Cabot lot, you are right, there are dormant ones there although the implication was that they were trading using those names and I had no evidence of that. What our uncovering has done though is made the Information Commissioner and Trading Standards question the Data Protection Act issues of passing data from one to another without our permission and if you are finding that with Asset Link too many comparrisons can be made. I haven't looked into asset Link, but is there any connection between to 2 companies? Directors ?

 

Keep up the good fight my friend, we are all behind you.

 

No problem Andrew I was razzing you :p

 

I have a list of directors for Asset Link (apart from one who has a benificial interest held by some trust company, so he/she/they are trying to remain hidden.

 

If you can PM me the list of Cabot directors to save me looking them up I'll let you know if any match up.

 

I did notice that Asset Link use our dear old friends DLA Piper as their firm of solicitors though, along with several other banking concerns.:eek:

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator

 

No problem Andrew I was razzing you :p

 

I have a list of directors for Asset Link (apart from one who has a benificial interest held by some trust company, so he/she/they are trying to remain hidden.

 

If you can PM me the list of Cabot directors to save me looking them up I'll let you know if any match up.

 

I did notice that Asset Link use our dear old friends DLA Piper as their firm of solicitors though, along with several other banking concerns.:eek:

 

If thats DLA Piper Ltd than there another dormant company

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary

 

TName & Registered Office:

DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY LIMITED

1 ST PAULS PLACE

SHEFFIELD

S1 2JX

Company No. 05415039

 

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifStatus: Active

Date of Incorporation: 06/04/2005

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Private Limited Company

Nature of Business (SIC(03)):

9999 - Dormant Company

Accounting Reference Date: 30/04

Last Accounts Made Up To: (NO ACCOUNTS FILED)

Next Accounts Due: 06/02/2007

Last Return Made Up To: 06/04/2006

Next Return Due: 04/05/2007

Last Members List: 06/04/2006

Previous Names:Date of changePrevious Name18/05/2005BROOMCO (3772) LIMITEDBranch Details There are no branches associated with this company.Oversea Company Info There are no Oversea Details associated with this companythey changed their name this year

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have computer problems, but now I am back... Wulf thanks for your comments and welcome to CAG, all comments are useful..

 

As previously stated though, Cabot and Kingshill are seperate companies, I appreciate your comments in relation to Cabot being on a Trading estate called Kinghill, but just for example the former Woolwich head office is in Bexleyheath but they did not feel the need to open a seperate company called Bexleyheath....

 

Any insight you can shed on Cabot would be very welcome... Merry Xmas P.S can you tell you colleagues to hurry up with their response to my complaint...

 

Many Thanks

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol no chance......

 

I was busy with work then had pc problems... Only now have I had time to get it sorted..

 

Anyway.... in relation to the thread.. Cabot have not responded to me at all, no letters, no emails and no telephone calls.... Obviously they have playing for time.......

 

In the new year, I am going to step things up a gear and start putting some pressure on them... I am have a really good feeling about 2007

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have computer problems, but now I am back... Wulf thanks for your comments and welcome to CAG, all comments are useful..

 

As previously stated though, Cabot and Kingshill are seperate companies, I appreciate your comments in relation to Cabot being on a Trading estate called Kinghill, but just for example the former Woolwich head office is in Bexleyheath but they did not feel the need to open a seperate company called Bexleyheath....

 

Any insight you can shed on Cabot would be very welcome... Merry Xmas P.S can you tell you colleagues to hurry up with their response to my complaint...

 

Many Thanks

Thanx everyone for your kind comments. Its nice to go on a board and not be flamed for admitting who you are.

Tbern, not much I can do about hurrying the process along as I don't work down in the customer relations department. They take long enough to answer our queries let alone comments and problems from customers..

I'm not sure how much insight I can give to Cabot apart from the fact they are a good company to work for and they treat their employees very well (did I mention they gave me xmas bonus:-D ) but if you want to ask any questions I'll see what I can do about answering themk for you

Merry christmas everyone

Wulfinuk

S.A.R SENT TO ABBEY 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome wulfinuk, this forums about helping everyone, if we shot down anyone from within the banks or institutions half the forum would be dead !:-D The first question I would like to pass your way is whether you are aware of the difference between the companies there. Kingshill No1 Ltd predominates the Defaulting process and buying the debt but according to anything found in the public domain Kingshill No1 Ltd don't have staff, don't answer letters and no one down there in West Malling seems to have heard anything about them except as the name of the estate and a school. Do you know if it even supports a telephone?

 

Also, which company of the fifteen odd companies in the so called ' Cabot Group' ( and I mean it's full name), actually employs everyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...