Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

kerrypotterV'sHSBC


Kerrypotter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think if I called Gordon Rambo I would be asking him more than what he would say to this....he is a dish!

 

Think it's time for another nudge then.......shall I mention the draft order again or just send a run of the mill nudge...?!?!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys!!!!!! Had a great weekend, and feeling surprisingly good about being 30.

 

Got me letter from the court, 6th Sep.......but a phone hearing and no metion of court bundles or money???? What now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes kerry but with the telephone hearing you have the added pressure point of asking if they have organised it with BT yet. then when you hear nothing you can write to the court and say DG have done nothing please strike out the defence.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really Ok....So I can do this closer to the time?!?!

 

I am worreid a bit as I am reading up on everybodys and I have had to do no AQ, no Allocation fee, no nothing. I am guessing this is a new tactic to just push it aside as the judge knows that they will settle anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The telephone hearing just throws everything at DG from your and the courts point of view, they have been told to organise it, if they dont they are ignoring the judges directions and their defence will be struck out for abuse of process.

 

The only way out they have is to make you an offer.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes ask them to let you know what the arrangements are for the hearing or when they expect to have this agreed with BT.... its a bit like making the criminal build his own scaffold before you hang him

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning - Ok......so it says this

 

Take notice that the allocation hearing will take place on 6 September 2007 at 3.30pm.

 

blah blah blah

 

please note: this hearing has been listed as a telephone conference in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule PD23

 

It is the applicant Solicitors responsibility to arrange the Telephone Conference with a conference provider, and to contact the court on (tel number) to ascertain the name of the judge that will be hearing this matter, at least two days before the hearing.

 

and then it says about filing the documents we wish to rely apon the last working day before the hearing.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

right how does this sound?

 

 

I am very disspointed that you have failed to acknowledge my registered letter of 14th June 2007, and the numerous letters previously, asking you to consider my claim and all my attempts at resolution.

I have been notified by the court that a telephone hearing has been scheduled for 6th September 2007. I would therefore be grateful if you could let me know the arrangements for the hearing and when you would expect to have this agreed with British Telecom.

It is still my feeling that you seem to have no intention of defending this claim and are simply procrastinating.

In order to more speedily resolve this matter, I am willing to accept the sum of £2300 as full and final settlement of this particular claim. I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality.

 

Please find enclosed another copy of my schedule of charges relating to this claim.

 

I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim might be achieved. I am sure that the courts would whole heartedly approve of our settling this matter in a timely manner and without their further intervention.

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right how does this sound?

 

 

I am very disspointed that you have failed to acknowledge my registered letter of 14th June 2007, and the numerous letters previously, asking you to consider my claim and all my attempts at resolution.

 

I have been notified by the court that a telephone hearing has been scheduled for 6th September 2007 and you are responsibility for arranging the Telephone Conference with a conference provider. I would therefore be grateful if you could let me know what arrangements for the hearing you are making and when you would expect to have this agreed with a conference provider.

 

It is still my feeling that you seem to have no intention of defending this claim and are simply procrastinating.

 

In order to more speedily resolve this matter, I am willing to accept the sum of £2300 as full and final settlement of this particular claim. I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality.

 

Please find enclosed another copy of my schedule of charges relating to this claim.

 

I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim might be achieved. I am sure that the courts would whole heartedly approve of our settling this matter in a timely manner and without their further intervention.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

 

Hiya Kerry, made a couple of alterations to throw it squarly in DG's lap and hopefully make someone there think we better do something about this (like make you an offer :)) the rest of it looks ok.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Pete - have just sent it

 

Hopefully they will make an offer now. I spoke to HSBC a week ago as my boyfriend got an offer and wanted to know what their game was, but apparently now they have a designated team who are dealing with this and are now turning offers around in 8 weeks. So he got in in that time. anyone who was before that and is now going through the court process has to deal with DG and that is it......

 

Good thing I guess is that we get the interest etc when they FINALLY pay up

 

thanks again, will let you know when I hear anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...