Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • [URL=https://meettomy.site]Pretty Girls in your town[/URL]
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fendy V Natwest 16.1k. Anything I Can Do About The Shoddy Envelopes Used By Natwest.


fendyweather
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Fendy have you thought they may have sent you an answer, but if its in a tatty torn brown envelope. It might have got lost. ;)

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My 6 years worth of statements also arrived inaripped cheap brown envelope.

I have just joined the group and am worried about the length of time it appears to take to gain satisfaction. I have read in news papers and web sites that it need only take weeks rather than months. However that does not account for delaying tactics I still have no address or departement to deal with and am wrorried that lack of response from Nat west

As it is all call centre I posted my request by hand inmmy local branch I have kept copies of everything but did not imagine I would have to Register them.

The first hand delivered missive gained a response in 30 days Ok My statements

I then sent , hand delivered to my branch -a request for payment /refund with a copy list of all charges - both the total charges and a total with interest Asking fora response in 14 days Nothing Not even a "we are dealing it" So I have no name /department /or ref number to reply to.

2nd letter went again hand delivered -withpout prejudice asking for a lower settlement figure in 14 days orcourt action = again nothing

I should be starting court action tomorrow should I just go for it or fax to that number for S Higley , giving 24hrs Anyone got an address that I might use.I feel as if I have not done enough homework

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ripski........ I think it's really worthwhile starting your own thread on the nat west forum - ripski vs natwest. That way, you can get advice and support on your claim from the word go.

 

As you hand delivered your prelim and LBA to your branch, it's likely that they passed these on to the customer relations unit in Borehamwood. However, as you didn't send them there recorded post yourself you've got no way of proving that they ever received them.

 

Also, at prelim and LBA stages, you only ask for the actual charges back - the 8% interest can only be added on by the courts. If you claimed contractual interest though - that' fine. And at LBA stage, you stick to claiming your full amount of charges back.

 

In your situation, I'd be inclined (and I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong) to re-send your LBA with the full schedule of charges (minus the 8% interest column) to:

 

Stuart Higley

Nat West Customer Relations Unit

225 Shenley Road

Borehamwood

Hertfordshire

WD6 1BR

 

Send it recorded delivery (only costs a quid) and explain that you hand delivered prelim and previous LBA to local branch. However, give them an extra 7 days to respond to your LBA before taking them to the court stage.

 

Hope that helps - good luck, hedgey xx :D

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could add that you previously sent list in with the 8% on purely to show the extent of how much the interest at 8% would be, were you to end up taking it to court, but that you would of course, at this stage be entirely happy to take FULL REFUND OF CHARGES ONLY. That way you are acknowledging that you know you are not entitled to the 8% at this stage and letting them know if they come back with full offer of all charges only, you would be happy to accept, and end of......... Good luck though.

 

Fendy xxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think if any mail not come to us intact the responsible for that is the sender not the royal mail wend is sent via normal mail so you must ask natwest again for your statements and they have to proof that they have send them to you in fact who i think they cant do only if they sent the envelop recorded or special delivery they can really proof the sending.

if your statements have been lost in transation yes you are entitled to sue natwest for identity teft and possibly being victim of fraude the best advice i can give you is to close your account imediatly to nobody can make use of your details.

good luck mate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fendy, I've just seen your thread about the tatty inadequate envelopes NatWest use to send bundles of statements out.

 

I complained to NatWest that mine was split down the length of both sides - so bad in fact that Royal Mail had put the contents into a strong plastic envelope for onward travel to my abode.

 

The bank's response to my complaint about quality of envelope was to blame Royal Mail. Saying they had stated on the plastic envelope that the brown envelope had became damaged in transit.

 

So, by their reckoning, if I sent some raw eggs to someone in an ordinary box - not a moulded egg container from a shop - and they arrived broken that would be Royal Mails fault, not mine, for not packing them carefully inthe first place.

 

I made a valid point to NatWest, that in this age of identity fraud, I could easily have lost some sensitive information from the split envelopes. Needless to say they were not concerned!

 

Regards DAVIDP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My brothers statements came in the same way. given there envelope there is no way the envelope could NOT break. There must be something we can do about this, it is a serious data protection issue. I got £150 off HSBC for sending statements to wrong address (even though it was my ex), wonder if I could do same here?

 

We can always threatten the FOS, if they do investigate a complaint it costs the bank money.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I wrote to both Natwest and my local MP about this. A whole years worth of mine were missing from the envelope when they arrived, and my postie had very kindly bagged them all up (the ones that were left) and brought them to me in plastic post office bag, but to date, I have not even had the courtesy of a reply from either Natwest or my MP. Disgraceful really. But sadly, nobody seems to care on iota............ its shamefull. It really is............ Ive now been put at risk of Id fraud or theft and they just get away with it. Its so wrong.................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My statements should arrive soon, found this thread unbeliveable - so obviously a "work-to-rule" issue on natwest's part.

 

But a difficult case to prove really cos of Parkvale's more elquently put Royal Mail/Natwest blame-game.

 

Will definitely let you know the condition of mine

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just dropped in to let everyone know that my data arrived from HFC bank this morning (just within the 14 days I gave them in my non-compliance letter) in a lovely HSBC post-safe packet, all data intact! Have HSBC group always used these or are the banks starting to realise they can't treat our data in this way?

 

SM:p

Paying interest on a loan caused by penalty charges? Read this!!

 

Very useful A-Z here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html?highlight=can%27t+find+what+you%27re+looking+for%3F

 

New strategy for Scots claims here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/scotland/71013-urgent-attention-please-read.html

 

Scottish procedure:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland/42620-scottish-procedure.html

I am a layperson not a legal expert, my advice is offered without prejudice or liability, it is purely my opinion based on personal experience and should be treated as such. If in any doubt seek the advice of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just dropped in to let everyone know that my data arrived from HFC bank this morning (just within the 14 days I gave them in my non-compliance letter) in a lovely HSBC post-safe packet, all data intact! Have HSBC group always used these or are the banks starting to realise they can't treat our data in this way?

 

SM:p

hi there just to said that my statements have been sent to my branch and in very excellent condition

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just rediscovered your thread and have drafter this to send to Natwest.

 

I thank you for complying with my earlier Subject Access request and look forward to contesting the legality of your charges in court. However I must say that the envelope in which the statements were dispatched was wholly inappropriate. In light of the present climate in relation to Identity theft I cannot believe that a large financial institution would dispatch years worth of bank statements in a standard envelope.

I also wish you to know that I have evidence that other customers of Natwest have raised this issue, but you have taken no action.

. Fortunately for me Royal Mail placed the envelope into a protective wrapper and, so far as I could tell, no statements were missing. My point is that another person could easily have obtained this information, though I do not blame Royal Mail for using a clear plastic cover for the envelope. The fault lies firmly with your organisation which has an obligation to protect confidential information it holds on present and past customers.

I shall be contacting my MP and the local press unless I receive a satisfactory response. I would also like to make you aware that your shoddy envelope is a clear breach of the Banking Code.

"2. Our key commitments to you: We will treat all your personal information as private and confidential, and operate secure and reliable banking and payment systems.

11.1 We will treat all your personal information as private and confidential (even when you are no longer a customer). We will not reveal your name and address or details about your accounts to anyone

12.1 We will co-operate as an industry so that you enjoy secure and reliable banking and payment systems you can trust."

Nowhere does it say that you will send out a large pile of statements in an envelope which would only be adequate for a single monthly statement. Any employee of Royal Mail could know my address and account numbers, this is not acceptable as you have a legal as well as moral duty to safeguard data you hold on your customers.

 

 

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well what do you think?

 

Should I take up poisoned pen letters? lol

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go for it . the only way they will put their house in order is by being forced to change their ways. That will only be achieved by people that are bothered to force that change. So give them hell. Good luck.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I havent given up on this point, just had a lot on plate of late......... Im still determined to keep badgering them about this point of the utterly disgraceful unsecured way they send their post out. Theyre putting so many people at risk of ID fraud, that Im not letting it drop either. Nobody at all has bothered to answer any of my letters Ive sent about this, so Im feeling particularly naughty this week. I think Im gonna bang a letter off to Sir Fred about these, (if you dont get joy from the minions, my opinion is go straight to the top) and Im also gonna copy in IC and let them know the state mine came in. Ive already had notification from Experien last week that somebody tried to get a loan in hubbys name, weve obviously stopped that now, but I think its interesting to see it may have been by the same person who nicked a years worth of my statements in transit. Not funny really, but good were registered with the CRA's to keep a regular check on our files. Its cost me to do so though. And the way I see it Nutwest should have to pay for this for having put us at risk in the first place by the way they sent these out. So my main fight is the claim, but then Im back onto this point to try and get it sorted for others going forward. Keep fighting and we will get results, might take a while, but if we keep quiet, then nobody wins. Lets push push push and try and do something. Fend xxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi trudd,

Did you receive all the statements you requested? or have they sent out the regulation amount? I ask on the basis that I havent received my full amount which could possibly be for a backlog of requests to fulfill, yet you have received yours in a week! bob m.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...