Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Salary being witheld


lish
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6299 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I know this is a bit off topic but I have noticed something similar posted here before so thought you might be able to help.

 

I am currently working my notice and as such will not be completing a training course which I had embarked on. The company has witheld half of my final wage (amounting to £750) saying this is to fund a percentage of the course in line with a training policy.

 

I have never had a contract of employment and nor have I signed anything agreeing to this policy.

 

If anyone has any knowledge in this area I would really appreciate your advice before I speak to my boss

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are entitled to a contract of employment within eight weeks ( i think thats right) of commencing work, with certain details in this.

I would challenge their witholding of pay, since this may amount to an unlawful deduction.

Ask them to produce the signed (by you) copy of this conntract, in the first instance.

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I was trying to ascertain whether they had another agenda.

And if you had not been given a contract of employment, then tribunal time!!!

As it is you may still be able to, on the no contract issue and the witholding of pay.

Bet you're glad to be leaving.Company sounds like a shower of you know whats......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately - it's typical of the industry (PR), so career change time for me

 

Thanks for your help, just got to take a deep breath and go and knock on the bosses door now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only withold money if they have received your signed agrement to it. This would be in the form of a contract of employment, or a training form some companies use stating that the money can be lawfully deducted from salary to cover course if you leave within xxx amount of time.

 

If your chat doesn't go to plan, contact the CAB and get an ET1 form (Employment Tribunal form) citing unlawful deductions from earnings. That combined with the fact they have not provided you with a written contract of employment should be enough to get them to roll over.

 

Hope that helps.

12-03-07 Halifax Received £1800

05-06-07 Halifax II Small Claim Served for £2503

Capital One - Won £768

Halifax Credit Card - Won £756

Link to post
Share on other sites

The employer doesn't actually have to give you a written contract as such - a contract can be verbal and is formed when you are offered, and then accept the job, but they do have to issue you with a written statement of terms including hours, pay, sickness and holiday entitlements and required periods of notice on either side. Many firms will just give a schedule of hours and pay, and a copy of say, a company handbook (or access to one) which will go into greater detail about employer and employee rights and obligations. If there is no specific term in a handbook or anywhere else relating to the cost of training being reimbursed by the employee on termination then they cannot enforce it.

 

If you can't find this clause in a handbook, or posted on a company noticeboard, then ask where in your terms of employment it was advised to you that this has been agreed by you, then phone ACAS for advice (08457 47 47 47).Have a look here Acas - Protection from unauthorised deductions

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened with my partners ex company when he left, they deducted the entire last months salary from him for training courses, they even deducted him money for learning his job when he started, i.e him sitting with another employee to learn the ropes! they were a shamble of a company. He had to write a letter outling his grievences, have a meeting with them and then went to a tribuneral, the company paid up just before the hearing.

I would suggest you get on to ACAS they were fab great advise and assistance.

HSBC Prelim sent 7/8 for £1062 -

Give me my money!!

LBA sent 16/8 (thanks to Debs77!!)

Offer received 24/8 £995 - accepted

 

Nationwide Prelim sent 5/9 for £3090.50

Nothing heard - LBA sent 20/9

Letter received telling us to go bank elsewhere if we are not happy - We will when we get our money thanks!

MCOL filed 8/11

Part payments received 16/11

Notice to defend 17/11

Link to post
Share on other sites

A company I worked for several years ago (also PR) tried to do the same with me. i pointed out that it was not in my contract and they backed down straight away.

 

remember, you know PR now - they wouldn't like bad PR, now would they? ;)

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i just add that some company's include in their contract that you work for a certain amount of time after training, to ensure that they get their moneys worth. check contract again before following up, and by the way tribunals are not hard to go to, i won 3 days pay once and it didn't cost me a penny to go to tribunal. Its the principal and well as the money.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes as bally35 said your employer should have given you a contract of employment within two months. training schemes usually mean you sign declorations stating that if you leave within XXXmonths you pay XXX towards cost of scheme/test etc. try the acas site

Acas - Home they are particularly informative on there.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...