Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

natwest v shelbel1


shelbel1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok thanks again gizmo-just one more little thing- do i have to post a new thread evertime i need help or can i post threads to people who have replied to me before?

 

Just continue in your old thread,and then you story keeps in one place, everytime you post on the thread it wil lgo to top of list.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi there gizmo or anyone who would like to help me!!

still hav'nt heard from natwest so i need to start preparing that large confusing court bundle.

do i just simply print everything????? - as i said before its all gobbldy gook to me.!!!!

can i print and send it off anytime or does it have to be exactly 2weeks befor my court date(27/04/07)?

please any advice GREATLY APPRECIATED.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You actually need to prepare three copies of the court bundle, one for the court, one for the defendant and one for yourself. It will probably be a good idea to leave it as late as possible to try and save yourself some printing.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry bit confusing-dont know how to post a link so here is the letter i received fom cap' one

 

"when we opened your acc' , we sent you a credit agreem' BLAH BLAH BLAH.which i signed & agreed to etc.

as youre prob' aware the OFT havent challenged the right of banks to charge default fees, but merely the level of those fees.

although we feel £20 is just a fee , we've reduced our fees to £12 so that we're inline with our competitors.

i appreciate that you've incurred previous fees at the higher rate & would like to address this.

i've reviewed your account & as a matter of goodwill i'd like to reduce the fees we've added to your account to £12 each.

i've refunded £264.00 & you'll see this on youre APRIL statement.

if i dont hear from you in 4 weeks i will consider this matter closed "

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shelbe1:)

 

I'm a bit confused too !

Did you say Cap 1 sent you the letter, because you have posted in the Natwest Thread ?

 

Is it a capital one debt or a Nat West debt ?

 

Hope xx

You need to read this if you have ever consolidated lending through your bank,

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/49648-loans-pay-off-overdrafts.html

NatWest

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) LETTER SENT15/12/06 - STATEMENTS RCD 22/12/06

PRE-LIM AND SOC SENT 11/01/07

FULL CLAIM OF £4093.04 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INT :)

JUST WAITING FOR STANDARD BOG OFF LETTER...:rolleyes:

LETTER FROM STUART HIGLEY TODAY 20TH JAN THANKING ME FOR MY LETTER AND ADVISING ME THAT THEY ARE CONSIDERING MY CLAIM.... YEAH, BET THEY ARE !!!:lol:

LBA SENT 29/01/07

 

**** G.W.G PAYMENT OFFER RECEIVED TODAY FOR £2160. THAT WILL DO NICELY AS PART PAYMENT MR HIGLEY !!!:D ****

 

 

 

 

 

Member of the official Bill-K appreciation thread cos he's just ape !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry bit confusing-dont know how to post a link so here is the letter i received fom cap' one

 

"when we opened your acc' , we sent you a credit agreem' BLAH BLAH BLAH.which i signed & agreed to etc.

as youre prob' aware the OFT havent challenged the right of banks to charge default fees, but merely the level of those fees.

although we feel £20 is just a fee , we've reduced our fees to £12 so that we're inline with our competitors.

i appreciate that you've incurred previous fees at the higher rate & would like to address this.

i've reviewed your account & as a matter of goodwill i'd like to reduce the fees we've added to your account to £12 each.

i've refunded £264.00 & you'll see this on youre APRIL statement.

if i dont hear from you in 4 weeks i will consider this matter closed "

 

link provided

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/69755-capital-one-what-charges.html#post693889

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

help-i'm at court with natwest 27th april-i've had no offers or any communication from natwest so i am preparing my court bundle but i still have no idea what it all means!!! shall i just print it all off and send it x 3 copies(n/w solicitors, court , mine) and hope that natwest get in touch ?/

ANY ADVICE ANYONE PLEASE??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get reading up on the court bundle section and you can begin preparing but dont give up on settlement yet. Remember, theyve yet to appear in court. If I were you, I would wait till say, 18th or 19th and drop them a phone call stating: "Do you know you are in court on 27th, if you dont plan on turning up, are you planning to settle before then, or do I tell the judge you wont be turning up, something smart like that............... Sometimes they genuinely dont realise what date they are in court. I think they are so swamped........ but I also think you will get a cheque in settlement before then anyway. Read read read in the meantime on your court bundle section, and ensure you know what you need to be sending in, still take the time to read up and prepare, but I dont think you will need to submit bundle. But if they havent been in touch to settle before date is up that you have to submit bundle, then still submit it anyway. they usually cave round about now, but has been known to be anything right up to the day before court, so ensure you do your homework before then just in case........... All the best, but whatever you do, dont panic. They wont show. Really. !!!

 

Fendy xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you get your bundle in by the date stated on the order.

 

Have a read of this thread, which should help, and if you're still not sure of anything after that then just ask -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/64911-got-court-date-guide.html

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GARY AND FENDYWEATHER- THANKS FOR THE ADVICE!!

i will try that phone call and see what happens , but in meantime i'll still prepare my bundle in preparation to send off, thanks again fingers crossed & feet & eyes etc ha ha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Shelbel............. fingers and toes crossed for you!!!! Good luck with this - let us know how you get on! xx :D

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gary i just need to know a bit about statement of evidence , do i need to do one of these in my bundle.

i think i have printed off everything else i need and am still trying to go through it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not essential unless the court has specifically requested one, but it certainly won't do any harm.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionnaires-3.html

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...