Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A New Way of Looking at Interest- 1st successful Claim - N'wide


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi bill,

 

To be honest I haven't looked into the way charges and interest for credit cards work so I can't answer that question.

 

RE Lucid's post I've adjusted the spreadsheet so that it won't calculate monthly interest until the first of the next month. Before it was calculating interest for Sept as we're in Sept, but it now won't make the calculation until Oct 1. This is probably a better way of doing things.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 821
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Tim - sorry, I wasn't being sarky. I think another piece of the puzzle has clicked for me now. If I've got this right, then an APR of 24% is a way of saying that your £100 will become £24 after a year, regardless of how it's calculated. In some cases, it may be arrived at by simple interest at 24% pa., and in others, it may be arrived at by compound at some other rate (which I have yet to understand how to calculate). Yes, I guess I really do need someone to tell me what annual rate to put in my annual rate box on my spreadsheet. APR, APY, AER. I'm afraid my obvious ignorance here is far from bliss.

 

Mindzai - I'm glad I stumbled across something useful !! How soon is the updated version available? or can I tweak mine?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bill,

 

It's available now. Just follow the link in Mindzai's signature. It should be v1.4.

 

Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK let me know if you get any problems with it ;)

 

EDIT: This is Mindzai, wrong account again. Must stop moving between computers to post!

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither was I ... I think there is lots of confusion, and the example of the incorrect calculator on the solicitor's site demonstrates that.

 

"In some cases, it may be arrived at by simple interest at 24% pa., "

 

I think it's very confusing to introduce simple interest into discussions of APR. The trouble is, for a period of six months, the compound interest at 24% APR would be £11.36, while the simple interest would be £12.

 

The simple interest is higher than compound for periods less than a year, and lower for periods greater than a year.

 

In practice, the differences are small, especially with lower interest rates; so even if the charges you're reclaiming were all in the last year, you still wouldn't be asking for much more than you're entitled to if you were to use simple interest rather than compound.

 

And in the real situations here, anything gained on the less-than-twelve-months swings would be more than lost on the over-twelve-months roundabouts.

 

Tim

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Your latest post seems somewhat at odds with what you have posted on this subject elsewhere. At first you seem to be encouraging people to go for contractual and saying there "is no problem", and now people are doing it you seem to be saying it's risky and complicated. This is also the stance certain members of the 'forum team' have taken - one minute advising people that "the reality is banks aren't going to court" and the next advising extreme caution. I hope you can see that when you are in the postition you are in, people are going to take you at your word and proceed down the contratual route because of your encouragement. It then causes confusion when you do a u-turn on your approach to the subject. I agree that this is incorrect, but that's the reality of it, and imo you have a responsibility towards your members, depite the fact that this is a self help forum. If you choose to take this contructive critisicm as an attack, I apologise, that is not how it is intended.

 

To clarify, I don't think the arguments are at all a problem. I think that they are straightforward and self-evident. Furthermore, I think that the court will appreciate without difficulty the principle which is being argued; it will not find a claim for contractual interest cranky or at odds with its understanding of principles (this does not mean that it will agree. The court may still decide that there is no implied term.)

I do not believe that it is risky as I don't see why a claim for contractual interest should cause a claim to be alocated away from the SCT.

Where it will cause complications is with the bank and for the claimant who wants his money back quickly, smoothly and without stress. It is likely to cause delays in payments and is capable of taking the claim one step closer to anactual hearing than had it merely contained a claim for statutory interest.

 

I think that the banks have to be broken in to this kind of clim and this means starting small and working up.

 

Don't forget that we are all learnig here.

 

When the site first started our very clear advice was to avoid claiming more than £5000 at all costs (sic). However we now have now seen that this caution was probably unnecessary as there have been many payouts of very substantially more than £5000 from most of the banks.

 

What will we learn about their resistance to contractual interest?

 

=========================================================

 

Elsewhere since my last post someone has suggested that it would be an error to calcaulate the contractual rate based on simple interest and that the court would draw a disfavourable conclusion from this.

 

I wholly disagree. You are simply setting the contractual rate as the basis for your claim. Whether or not you decide to underestimate it is a matter for you.

 

Use it as a bargaining tools if you like.

In your correspondence with the bank tell them that you will accept a reduced payment based on simple interest but that if they force you to issue a claim then it will be correctly calculated and that it will cost them more.

Of course this won't make a blind bit of difference to the bank because they never make any effort to avoid the inevitable. However, you will get brownie points for being reasonable.

 

Of course, the issue of the contractual rate might get blown out of the water the first time the matter is heard - but will it ever come to that.

In order for the issue of the contractual rate to be heard, the banks would have to be prepared to go to court on the basic issue of penalty charges first. They haven't wanted to do that yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your claification BankFodder. So let's say that a contractual case does get to court, and the judge does not agree that it is an implied term. Would this then result in the entire claim being thrown out, or would the judge just discount the contractual interest and revert to the alternative of s69 (assuming you have suggested this alternative in the particulars)? I realise the answer to this is probably 'it depends on the judge', but from a legal point of view if the judge disagrees with part of the claim that doesn't mean the whole thing is automatically thrown out, is that right?

 

Mindzai

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole claim would not be thrown out, you would be able to rely on the 8% if you had detailed it on your claim - or worst case scenario if you only mentioned the contractual rate then you would receive no interest but could still win and get back the charges.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BankFodder & Barracad. It has been a bit of a worry to me that my case might be found not to be "dead right" and thus completely thrown out as being "dead Wrong." I have really just clung on to my faith that the Small Claims procedure allows for minor errors by laymen. However, I have now also come to realise that if you don't claim something explicitly, then the claim will not be implied by the court, and fallback positions need to be set out in the original claim. If yer doesn't ask, yer doesn't get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to butt in - RBS just confirmed payment to me at Contractual rate after speaking with their legal department on credit cards. So it does work :D . Customer services said they wanted to discuss the 8% or contractual - came back Paid contractual in full -Bankfodder, you are on this thread so a special thank you to you too - I know what you have been doing for everybody since day 1 I also know I've been a pain in the preverberal at times but thank you and all your team. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/9448-andrew1-rbs-universa.html

 

Sorry lads.... on you go !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mnrbig (is that really MrBig in disguise with a typo ?)

 

I've been struggling with the same s**t.

 

First I downed the spreadsheets from the Templates thread, and found the simple one easier to work with (surprise, surprise), but it didn't cater for adding compound interest (which is what claiming contractual rate is all about, really !!)

 

Then I found Mindzai & Lucid have put theirs online for downing, and that was very good for compound interest. But I was still at a loss as to exactly what figure to put in the master percentage box, in order to work the actual compound interest out. Tim helped with this, but in the end I reverse-engineered the formula for calculating compound, so that I could punch in the "AER" or "EAR" rate, and then work out what the compund rate should be. I think I've got it right, now, but I wouldn't mind somebody testing it for me.

 

I'd be happy to put my spreadsheet online for others to test and/or try using - but I don't know how. Anybody care to tell me ??

 

Er...Tim, Mindzai...You there ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

mnrbig - the spreadsheet in my sig works fine for bank accounts but from what I gather it cannot be used for credit cards (I haven't looked into this, but I understand interest is calculated in a different way).

 

bill-k - you should just be able to put in your bank's published AER rate to get the monthly and daily rates. Maybe I'll update it so you can type in the monthly rate instead if you know that and have it calculate the annual rate from there too.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mindzai - sorry I doubted you. I just wasn't quite clear as to exactly which rate to punch in to your (or anybody else's) spreadsheet, as I was aware of the different rates used by the banks, but not of what those differences are. I now realise that your spreadsheet does indeed work out the true compound interest from the AER or APR rate. With further explanation from Tim and various Google searches, I think I eventually grasped it. So I tried it out on Vampiress's simple spreadsheet, and puched in the formulae, then reverse-engineered it to calculate the actual rate from the AER/APR. Then I compared it with yours, and they agree. In doing this, I think I have now given myself a grasp of the subject. If I doubt you or Lucid in future - remind me NOT to doubt you !!

 

I would be interested to know what the difference is with credit card interest, though. The only difference I can see is that

(a) They charge monthly, and quote monthly rates - even though they still calculate interest daily.

(b) their APR rate includes charges for cash advances, so the standard formula might give the wrong result. I think if we use their APR for normal purchases, etc., then that would equate to the banks' AER.

Well - that's MHO, FWIW !!!

Mnrbig - I would certainly suggest you use a spreadsheet, as opposed to your calculator. The formulae are already punched in, and you can just save it and print it as and when required. I see Vampiress is re-drafting hers, too, so that's worth checking out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure, but I think something needs to be made clear to those who have recently found themselves confronted by the question "Contractual or Statutory Interest?" I get the impression that a number of people are confusing this question with "Should I claim back the interest that the bank charged me on that portion of my overdraft that was actually made up of penalty charges."

Claiming back the overdraft interest that the bank charged on each and every penalty charge on a monthly basis is entirely different from applying Contractual Interest to our claim. I wasn't charged much interest by the bank, as I was rarely overdrawn, so I decided not to go up that road. It looks like a lot of hard work to me.

Claiming interest on the charges that we are asking the banks to return to us is NOT the same as claiming BACK the interest which the banks' originally charged US. The Statutory or Contractual Interest being discussed here is US actually turning round to the bank and saying "OK. - you've had this money from us, and you had no authority to take it. As such it was unauthorised debiting, and by YOUR own standards set out in OUR contract, we hereby charge YOU interest on that. Now YOU either pay up or come up with a damned good reason why not."

Can someone put it a little more concisely and eloquently for me?

BankFodder?

I'm sure it would help a lot of people who are being put off by these apparently complex discussions, when they first stumble, blinking, into the Forum.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...