Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
    • please create your OWN topic by hitting create or + in the top red banner  
    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Torigirl Vs Barclays


torigirl_uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5884 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well they 'acknowledged' my claim, it said the 2/4/07, which was late, but when I looked at it yesterday they hadn't and I sent them a letter in the last post saying I would give them an extra 7 days to acknowledge, so do I now still give them 14 days to enter a defence, starting from when they were SUPPOSED to of acknowledge the claim, or from when they did acknowledge the claim, yesterday? I think its from when they were supposed too but just need clarification.:) And do I just ignore the letter I sent yesterday giving them more time, as it's now not relevant?

Thanks in advance

Tori

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 531
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Mumofthreeboys
Well they 'acknowledged' my claim, it said the 2/4/07, which was late, but when I looked at it yesterday they hadn't and I sent them a letter in the last post saying I would give them an extra 7 days to acknowledge, so do I now still give them 14 days to enter a defence, starting from when they were SUPPOSED to of acknowledge the claim, or from when they did acknowledge the claim, yesterday? I think its from when they were supposed too but just need clarification.:) And do I just ignore the letter I sent yesterday giving them more time, as it's now not relevant?

Thanks in advance

Tori

 

Tori, give them 28 days from the date the claim was deemed served. They will ignore your letter, as you say, it's irrelevant now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so it was deemed served on the 17th March, so 28 days is the 14th April, and is that when they have to defend the claim? Sorry mumof3 I do know this but am starting to doubt myself!!! Thanks soooo much for your help through this, you have been bloody brilliant!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys
Ok so it was deemed served on the 17th March, so 28 days is the 14th April, and is that when they have to defend the claim? Sorry mumof3 I do know this but am starting to doubt myself!!! Thanks soooo much for your help through this, you have been bloody brilliant!:)

 

Yes Tori, they should enter a defence by 14th April, but again if they do not you should send another copy of that letter to prompt them.

 

You are more than welcome xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quickie,

my claim has been acknowledged and I now need to send Barclays a schedule of my charges, is it ok to send an up to date one? as I can't remember the day I filed with MCOL to reset my computer and get the schedule correct to that day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi tori,

IMHO just send them an updated SOC with a letter stating that further to the acknowledgement of your claim you enclose an up to date soc blah blah blah... as long as you let them know i cant see it being a problem.

 

as far as i am aware you dont claim back the OD charges, unless unauthorised charges have put you in / over your OD.

eg if you have a dd set up for your tv licence, and you take out some cash, and these two transactions put you into your OD, then you cant claim the OD charges back for the authorised OD.

however, if your DD took you OVER your OD limit and they bounced it, charged you for bouncing it, and then charged you again because their charges took you further over your limit, then you can claim those charges back.

 

this is how i understand it, and how i have been progressing with my claim(s), however, MODS / Admin, if i am wrong, please let me know!

 

HTH

 

MB XX

08/02/07-Prelim letter & SOC sent to Barclays

22/02/07-LBA & updated SOC sent to Barclays

23/02/07-Prelim letter and SOC sent to RBS

05/03/07-Offer letter recd from RBS - full settlement, no conditions. Accepted

08/03/07-Paid in full from RBS:D

12/03/07-Offer from Barclays - less than 1/3 of the full amount, rejection letter sent with updated SOC:mad:

26/03/07-Claim #2 against RBS...Prelim letter and SOC sent (same account, more charges since settling last claim!)

18/05/07- recfd offer from RBS for full amount claimed, accepted!

25/0507-recd offer from barclays for full amount!!!! yippee!!! acceptance sent

26/0507-recd letter from barclays saying that they have closed my account???? help!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to keep my thread up-to-date I have sent my schedule of charges to Barclays solicitors today as I have had the acknowledgement from Barclays and from MCOL, so now they have until 17th to defend the claim, so back to the waiting game until then. Then I think once they defend I will get an AQ in the post?:)

Oh, the person who acknowledged the claim from Barclays side, so on my letter from MCOL it was Adrian St John, will that be the person from now on be dealing with my claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tori,

 

Barclays submitted their defence for my claim on the 4th April, they had until 5th April. I found out by phoning the courts yesterday they told I would get a copy in the post soon.

 

madhouse5:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, the person who acknowledged the claim from Barclays side, so on my letter from MCOL it was Adrian St John, will that be the person from now on be dealing with my claim?

 

Does anyone know if the person who signs my claim is the guy I will be dealing with from Barclays and has anyone else dealt with him? Is he nice? or hard work when it comes time to settle:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

his was the name on my defence but the person who dealt with my claim was kyrsta campbell who was very pleasant and ok to talk to.

i think a lot of people are terrified of phoning cos they think they are in for a confrontation , but that is just not the case , actually the exact opposite.

from what i've read i think they are all ok especially anthony lombardi but i did hear he had left.

keep us updated and good luck:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woooooooo hooooooo (I've got a working keyboard :rolleyes: )

 

Good to see things are developing nicely....

 

 

I dealt with Anthony Lombardi (not that long ago), as per my barclays thread....

 

The "method of madness" with Barclays :rolleyes: is too make you go through everything in the hope you drop the case; which you wont of course...

 

As soon as you receive a court date, of any sort, make a phone call.... be polite, and just ask "I'm sure you don't reallly want to attend court.... do you want to settle now??"

 

It didn't work for me the first time (it does for the majority though) but the second time I tried I got a phone call back the following day.... only a weekend before an allocation hearing.... he was virtually begging me to settle.....:)

 

When you make the phone calls always have an up to date settlement figure; pen, paper, and all your correspondance...

 

Anyway for now....:sad: .... get ready for the AQ... and play the waiting game....

 

 

Innocent :D

:D CLICK MY SCALES IF I HAVE BEEN USEFUL :D

*

BARCLAYCARD WON £307

*

CAPITAL ONE WON £2.1k

*

NATWEST WON £3.4k

*

LLOYDS TSB CURRENT

Start 26/4 LBA 7/6 conLBA 22/1 N1 12/3 AQ 3/5/07ONHOLD

MORE THAN/ LLOYDS MCARD

Start 2/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

MONUMENT VISA

Start 1/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

NATWEST BUSINESS

RESEARCHING

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) Thanx for that guys, sorry I didn't get back to you yesterday, had a bit of a bad day - didn't pass my driving test which is about 10 years too late:mad: Oh well always next time, obviously the driving test person doesn't realise how brill and inspiring I am?!!!!!:D
Link to post
Share on other sites

"tick tick tick......"

 

 

My lloyds current case they have till wednesday :rolleyes: (we'll both probably end up with a defence which.....

......from what I've been researching is slightly arguably better then applying for judgement.....)

 

Basically, if we get a defence (99% certain) then we are on the right very long track to success

 

If, ultimately, we apply for judgement now, ultimately barclays or lloyds, can apply for this to be 'set aside' delaying the process sometimes for months....

 

 

Keep us informed 'oh inspirational one'

 

Innocent :-D

:D CLICK MY SCALES IF I HAVE BEEN USEFUL :D

*

BARCLAYCARD WON £307

*

CAPITAL ONE WON £2.1k

*

NATWEST WON £3.4k

*

LLOYDS TSB CURRENT

Start 26/4 LBA 7/6 conLBA 22/1 N1 12/3 AQ 3/5/07ONHOLD

MORE THAN/ LLOYDS MCARD

Start 2/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

MONUMENT VISA

Start 1/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

NATWEST BUSINESS

RESEARCHING

Link to post
Share on other sites

:wink: Nope!

:D CLICK MY SCALES IF I HAVE BEEN USEFUL :D

*

BARCLAYCARD WON £307

*

CAPITAL ONE WON £2.1k

*

NATWEST WON £3.4k

*

LLOYDS TSB CURRENT

Start 26/4 LBA 7/6 conLBA 22/1 N1 12/3 AQ 3/5/07ONHOLD

MORE THAN/ LLOYDS MCARD

Start 2/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

MONUMENT VISA

Start 1/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

NATWEST BUSINESS

RESEARCHING

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprise, Surprise ....... they are late again! They were supposed to of defended my claim today, but haven't so far:mad: Pretty much what I expected they were late acknowledging and now are late to defend. How are they able to get away with this time and time again?!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...