Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide Credit Card - In a Twist!


illonavamp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6053 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm in a right twist with Nationwide Credit Card.

 

I am a contractor and as such am paid weekly.

 

Problem No 1

I told Nationwide this and said that I can more than make the minimum payment, but have to do it over, say, four weeks. So: say min payment is #200.00, I'd pay them #50 a week. They agreed to this, however

 

They apply late charges to my account. When I queried them I reminded them that they had agreed I pay the minimum amount over four weeks, as I get paid weekly. They said 'yes but as you dont physically pay the minimum amount when its due, you incur late charges.

 

So they are piling up on the card.

 

Problem No 2

In September 2006 I phoned them and asked them to cancel the Credit Life charges on the account. They said fine, they'd send me the form to cancel it and I should send it back to them and they'd cancel it. The form came, I signed, posted. A while later my statement came through with the credit life charges still being applied. I called them and they said that they never received the form, and that they'd send another. I received another, signed it, sent it back. A while later my statement came through with the credit life charges still being applied (see the pattern?). A short while after this I got a letter saying 'thankyou for your request to cancel, due to an admin error on our part we can't find your original application for a card, would you please sign the attached credit agreement'. I called them and said that the credit agreement they sent me has nothing to do with me cancelling credit life and that I wasn't going to send them any more money until they cancelled my credit life charges. They have now issued a default notice against me asking for the card balance in FULL.

 

Does anyone have any advice to give me, what can I do about this? I'm desperately upset about this whole mess and will NEVER have a card with Nationwide again. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Illona, are you saying that they are asking you to sign a new Nationwide

credit card application form.?

 

And when you talk about Credit Life charges, do you mean you are paying

life assurance premiums? Has the bank cancelled the direct debit yet?

Once I have the picture I will get back to you. Whatever you do, do NOT sign

that form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Illona, are you saying that they are asking you to sign a new Nationwide

credit card application form.?

>>> yes, they lost my original one, they say, so they say they can't verify my signature

 

And when you talk about Credit Life charges, do you mean you are paying

life assurance premiums?

>>> No its the credit card protection thing you can opt for, underwritten by credit life - least thats what shows up on my statement

 

Has the bank cancelled the direct debit yet?

>>> no direct debit, it comes straight off my credit card, and they are charging interest against what they've taken off

 

Once I have the picture I will get back to you. Whatever you do, do NOT sign that form.

>>> I wont! :-D

 

Appreciate your help, no clue what to do next....

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, write to them asking them to remove the default if they cannot produce

your authority for them to process your data.

If the credit life protection was included in the agreement, rather than a

separate contract, they do not have your permission to continue charging.

 

Then as Gizmo rightly says, you have a choice. You can carry on with

Nationwide if you want, or you can walk away. Might depend on how much

you can reclaim from their unlawful charges compared to what you owe.

 

PS If I was Nationwide, I would cancel your card -not for anything you

have done wrong, but because legally I don't have a contract with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciate some clarification here please:

 

First, write to them asking them to remove the default if they cannot produce your authority for them to process your data.

 

>>> So, if they can't find my original application, they can't produce a default notice?

 

If the credit life protection was included in the agreement, rather than a

separate contract, they do not have your permission to continue charging.

 

>>> This thing is underwritten by someone else (Credit Life I guess). However when I phoned them to cancel it it was Nationwide who sent me cancellation form, and Nationwide I sent it back to - that makes them an acting agent doesn't it and therefore responsible for actions on the policy?

 

Then as Gizmo rightly says, you have a choice. You can carry on with

Nationwide if you want, or you can walk away. Might depend on how much

you can reclaim from their unlawful charges compared to what you owe.

 

>>> My question here is what I can claim, I was going to ask them to refund ALL the Credit Life charges they have taken since I instructed them to cancel the policy, plus interest and late charges they applied after taking the payments.

 

PS If I was Nationwide, I would cancel your card -not for anything you

have done wrong, but because legally I don't have a contract with you.

 

>>> I can't walk away because I don't have the money to pay it off in full, they are threatening a CCJ so what can I do here? Make them an offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

They cannot threaten a CCJ because they dont have a credit agreement. Technically, you owe them nothing because you have not entered into an agreement with them. I think they were sending you a new agreement to sign because they knew this to be the case.

 

Send them a CCA letter with £1 and wait 12 days for them not to produce the agreement. After 12 days write to them and advise them that, as they cannot produce the credit agreement the debt is unenforceable and you do not acknowledge the debt. The only way they can get this enforced is by court order and if they go to court without a credit agreement then they dont have a leg to stand on.

 

Advise them that you want them to remove the default from the CRA with immediate effect as you have no credit agreement with them.

 

Good luck. Dont worry. You are in a very strong position. A much stronger position than Nationwide. Can I ask what is the balance due on the card? How much do you calculate the charges to be?

 

Kind regards

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

What Gemspan has said is exactly right. Everything stems from the original

agreement. It specifies the rules relating to the running of the card, the APR

and your permission to inform Credit Reference Agencies, debt collectors

etc. etc. Without the original agreement they do not have a legal document

in their hands that confirms your agreement to their terms.

 

So they cannot provide CRAs with any info on you-either good or bad-and

certainly not bad. CCJs are a definite no no for them. As are defaults-they

must remove them end of story. Or at least until they can find your original

contract.

 

I asked about Credit Life since all that is sometimes required is to tick a box

on the contract confirming you want the protection. Not sure how that pans

out if you have also to sign a further agreement with Credit Life.

 

As it stands, you do not even have to make them an offer. You are under no

legal obligation to pay them a penny. However you obviously have a moral

one, and they could yet turn up the original contract. But I should think that

they should be pretty amenable to cancelling the charges caused by their

own inefficiency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes, legally you dont owe them a thing but morally you know that you do. That is the dilemma. However, I think what is really annoying people is the way that these companies treat honest people who are trying their hardest to repay their debts but through unforeseen circumstances are unable to do so. There are people out there that will take the legal situation as a way out of paying their debts and of course legally they are entitled to do that. How that will affect them in the future though is a different story because, as we all know, all these companies seem to be interlinked in some way these days.

 

Because you are in such a strong position, I would contact them and make them come to the negotiating table. Perhaps you could negotiate to have the charges and interest waived, leaving the initial sum to repay at a rate YOU can afford that is not going to cause you financial hardship. After all, if they had complied with the law in the first place this would not have happened.

 

Good luck

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooooh goodness, thankyou SO MUCH for this information, I really had no clue what to do next.

 

"Send them a CCA letter with £1 and wait 12 days for them not to produce the agreement."

 

>>> I'm guessing thats on the site somewhere - I shall look for it.

 

"Advise them that, as they cannot produce the credit agreement the debt is unenforceable and you do not acknowledge the debt."

 

>>> You know, I did consider that, and I may well do if only to buy some time.

 

"I asked about Credit Life since all that is sometimes required is to tick a box on the contract confirming you want the protection. Not sure how that pans out if you have also to sign a further agreement with Credit Life."

 

>>> I'm sure I did tick a box at the time I took the card (2001) but since the balance was getting so big I stopped using the card to get it down a bit, and it was then I noticed the charges coming off (165.00 a time!) which was when I asked them to cancel it.

 

"Perhaps you could negotiate to have the charges and interest waived, leaving the initial sum to repay at a rate YOU can afford that is not going to cause you financial hardship."

 

>>> That's really all I want to do, I want to get it to the amount that I owe and start paying again. What gets my goat is that they're doing all this against a debt THEY MADE.

 

"Good luck. Dont worry. You are in a very strong position. A much stronger position than Nationwide. Can I ask what is the balance due on the card? How much do you calculate the charges to be?"

 

>>> The balance they are asking for in full is 9751.97. Of which, I'd say over 1000 of that is credit life charges, late fees and interest, though I haven't made any exact calculations.

 

 

 

 

Thank you much for this information, I'm a tad calmer than I was when I opened the letter. No, to find that CCA letter. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I found the CCA letter, this is what I plan to send:

 

============================

Dear Sirs,

I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further.

- a true copy of the agreement(s) I signed that you refer to in these matters outlined in your letter 6th February, namely

1. A true copy of the signed nationwide credit card agreement

2. A true copy of the signed consumer credit act agreement, if this is different.

3. A true copy of the signed 'credit card protection' application, if this is different.

This is my right under the legislation contained within section 77 (1) and section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 - your obligation also extends to providing statements of account. I enclose a £3 cheque in payment of the statutory fee.

You are reminded that you are obliged to supply this documents, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the CCA 1974.

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested.

I am now initiating investigations into the validity of the debt, various charges, interest and late fees made on this account, and will be in contact with you again in due course.

Additionally, you have entered a default notice against my credit record. This default occurred merely in respect of unlawful charges levied by you, or was the result of impecuniosity caused directly by the taking by you of charges applied after cancellation and penalty charges which you had applied unlawfully to my account.

I require that you remove the default entry from the register. Please note that mere correction or amendment to the entry will not be acceptable.

In the meantime please be aware that I consider this matter to be “in dispute”.

Your reply is required within the next 12 days.

============================

Does this look decent?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

It is always advisable to put that sentence on communication but when you are just asking for a copy of all the agreements then I wonder if you really need to do that! If they can't produce it then it wont be enforceable anyway. The OP recognises that he/she owes the money but not what they say he/she owes so the debt will be paid once all this information is to hand.

 

Kind rgards

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see,

 

After reading some threads here I 'gathered' that its the norm to ask for them first and if they are unable to provide them to make the 'I do not acknowledge' statement in a further letter.

 

What I really want them to do is take the Default Notice off, I don't care about anything else at the moment.

 

Thanks for letting me know anyway, I'll keep you all posted.

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Ok,

 

This morning I received court documents from Swindon County Court for the full value of the card, how should I respond to this? I am terrified now.

 

The facts are that I sent Nationwide CC a letter (as above) in February and they have never produced me a copy of the signed agreement.

 

It says in their court papers (quote "In August 2000 the claimant and defendant made an agreement for a credit card. By failing to use the credit card in accordance with the terms agreed between the Claimant and the Defendant and by failing to repay the unauthorised borrowing against the account on demand, the Defendant is in breach of the terms of the credit card agreement. The claimant claims the full amount outstanding from the Defendant."

 

There is NO copy of the credit agreement with my signature on it.

 

How should I proceed with this? What should I put in my defence?

 

help? ~shake

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sam

 

Firstly, calm down!!!!

 

Are there unlawful charges on this amount? If so, the amount they are claiming is wrong in the first place.

 

Secondly, they have not produced an agreement therefore they are breaking the law by taking this further.

 

I am sure that somebody with more experience will be along shortly to give you more detailed advice but basically you have a strong case for a complaint to all the authorities for their actions and a strong defence to any action they are taking against you.

 

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there are unlawful charges, dating back to last year at least. And yes, they have NEVER produced a copy of the signed credit agreement despite my asking in writing. Thanks I really need some advice here, I'm in a panic...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sam

 

Well, that is your defence. Advise that you disputed the amount owed and asked them to provide a copy of the original credit agreement which is your right under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. They failed to provide the agreement within the specified time and have never produced the agreement to date.

 

Perhaps you could pm someone re this. I know priorityone is very good in this area. I hope this helps.

 

Please dont panic. You are in a very strong position. If they cant produce the agreement then the debt is unenforceable. simple as that.

 

Good luck

Annie

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, thats put my mind at rest some. I'd have thought that they'd at least attach a copy of what I signed if they had it. So should I say exactly that on my defence?

 

My other question is, even if they can't, could they say "Well you were paying this off until last year so this must be your debt"...??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...