Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ICY -v- Abbey


ICY
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5082 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh and incidentally on the "Without Prejudice" subject. You can't include anything that is marked WOP ONLY if it contains a genuine attempt at settlement..... figures mentioned and terms. Otherwise it does not have the priviledge to be viewed as such and thus can be included.

 

If in doubt...post it up here either publicly or as a private post and we will advise you. :p

srfrench :eek:

 

Fight incompetance, stupidity, greed and unfairness......There's no excuse and no place for it in society, unless they really are! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 624
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

cheers srfrench i did try doing so bit my heads a shed at the mo, been doing this all day, maybe the acts will make more sense once i have had a break from the screen

 

On the same score though i want to make sure i dont leave anything out, and i dont want to just put the whole thing in if it is not needed this wouldnt benefit the judge or my case

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will trust me lol ;)

 

It took me a few goes but now I quote it virtually verbatim :o

 

Perserverance is whats its all about but it's all totally worth it in the end!

srfrench :eek:

 

Fight incompetance, stupidity, greed and unfairness......There's no excuse and no place for it in society, unless they really are! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

UTTCCR 1999 or should i put the whole document in

 

also same with UCTA do i need any particular sections or should i include it all

All, of both

the supply of goods & services act again which bits or all of it ???

None of it - not necessary v Abbey

  • Haha 1

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it any use adding

 

The consumer Law Centre Victoria Media release about australian bank fees and The competition report from Northern ireland or would these be irrelevant?

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CC report is highly relevant, so certainly include that - in fact thats essential for any Abbey bundle IMO.

 

The Aussie one less so, but worth including as you've referred to it in your witness statement, presumably.

 

Here's some bits to add to your WS if you like -

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/726-abbey-charges-5.html#post895532

 

some of the paragraphs from d) would be useful to include.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your a star gary thanks

 

would i put the witness statement at the front of the bundle or should i keep it as a seperate document

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the second SofE (Pre-estimate one), re-titled as a witness statement as a base, and add some paragraphs from section d) of what I just linked for you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionnaires-3.html#post482194

 

I would put it at the front - index/title page first, then WS, then the rest.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Icy,

 

Just thought I'd let you know what she paid me for my costs. Bundle WAS prepared but not submitted. Her colleague turned down my request over the phone but I e-mailed Inga & posted her a letter & she then agreed to pay it.

 

Total paid £368.10 broken down a follows:

 

30 hrs @ 9.25 p/h £277.50 5 letters @ 6.75 per letter £33.75 Ink £32.00 Paper £5.00 Postage £9.50 & Potocopying 207 sheets @ 5p per sheet £10.35

 

Could've gone for more on my time & postage in the end because there were lots of e-mails/letters backwards & forwards near the end but I was MORE than happy with this! After I'd submitted my list I did a spreadsheet breaking it down further (to apply to court for wasted costs)but she never asked for breakdown or receipts.

 

Hope this helps. Won't be long now! Keep going!

 

VF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a copy of the northern ireland report that doesnt have loads of bits cut from it, all i can seem to find is THIS and as i say there are loads of bits cut out and the tables arent complete

 

The CC report is highly relevant, so certainly include that - in fact thats essential for any Abbey bundle IMO.

 

The Aussie one less so, but worth including as you've referred to it in your witness statement, presumably.

 

Here's some bits to add to your WS if you like -

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/726-abbey-charges-5.html#post895532

 

some of the paragraphs from d) would be useful to include.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The cut bits are deliberately cut - confidential. The important bits are all there, so don't worry about it.

 

Heres the full report, but all you really need is appendix 4.6.

 

Provisional Findings report -Northern Irish personal banking

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just called Oldham courts to find out whats happening and was told that it has to go before the judge for an allocation hearing, when asked how long this might take he said how long is a piece of string, we have no idea how long it will be.

 

The bundle is now complete and ready to go, just needs to be printed, which apparently according to oldham court, I cant do until the allocation hearing has been heard ?????

 

i was really looking forward to sending the bundle off to abbey and to the court, guess i will have to wait a little longer.:(

 

Gary thanks for all your help, your a diamond :)

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just like me ICY, I've got the bundle all ready to go but got to wait until after Case Management Conference on the 28th June to send it.

 

Seems like everything has come to a halt with mine, just waiting for Abbey to settle or see them in court. Oh well, suppose I should tackle CapOne while I'm waiting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a thought, do you have any automated letters from Abbey tell you you're gonna be charged?

 

If you do, please please could you let me have copies (obviously without your details) cos I don't have any, Abbey stopped sending them about 2 months before I started claiming and in a mad moment during a clear out I threw them. I know Clarion needs some before Thursday as well, so it would be great if you had them. Ta, just in case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

could i still send abbey a copy of the bundle anyway, along with a spreadsheet showing costs incurred, or would there be no point.

Obviously i cant send a copy to the court yet

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gorge did just that so I suppose you could if you wanted to.

 

I'm not gonna bother till I see what happens with this Hearing on the 28th cos I might not have to submit, even though it's ready to go. Like Villafan I'll still be claiming wasted costs cos I've offered to settle without the bundle costs and been ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see the full document in print lol

 

its only 183 pages long :eek: , should give abbey something to rest their phones on ect, what i am wondering is will it make them send me a nice big cheque lol :D although i doubt it

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has Inga responded to your last letter? I am at exactly same stage as you and sent her an almost identical letter. She will not negotiatiate on her origanal offer with me and says she can no longer help me!!! I am a bit stuck now. Just curious what she has said to you

Link to post
Share on other sites

She said the same to me, so basically i said i will see her in court and i look forward to receiving thier bundle.

 

just got this months statement and the idiots are charging me £50 because they put me overdrawn by £9 the reason i went overdrawn was the day i filled the car up (i had enough money to do this according to online banking that morning) they then took 3 card payments out of my account, these payments were made 11 days previous, called abbey up, got someone in india who didnt understand what i was saying, so transferred me to a british call centre, reason they charged me? - because they say they had problems with the card system around this time, sorry sir on this occasion we will remove the charges for you.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

just checked emails and have had this from her

 

Dear Sir,

 

Thank you for you email however, in view of your response I am unable to take

the settlement discussions any further.

 

Kind regards,

 

Inga Kirkman

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...