Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yeah - I suppose the flies gotta eat too, but even they get my sympathy when chomping on a plate full of 1st crudites.

 

:eek:

 

FOS just wrote saying they are dealing with my case against the crudites and to give them any more data if I want to.

 

The point is that the crudites have not honoured my CCA request properly with that bad scanned page and are still harrassing me saying they want me to pay up.

 

Anyone got a good letter to follow up the FOS complaint with in light of this?

 

I do not want FOS to let the crudites get away with this one.

 

DD, should I mention that I have also offered to pay to see the docs, if they exist, as in the last good letter you gave me to use?

Edited by questioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 937
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

something like this to FOS ?

 

-------

 

Thank you for your letter received today.

I have enclosed more copies to show that 1st XXXX have not honoured my s 78 CCA application after many requests to do so and have only presented me – time and time again with a badly scanned copy, which is basically illegible.

You will see also that they have admitted to the fact that they cannot honour my s78 request for easily legible docs and that the copy of something they have persistently sent to me is of “poor quality.”

As you will see I have written back to inform them that they are still in default until which time thaey can provide proper legible docs.

They however are still, as you will observe by their last paragraph, hounding me for “repayment by return.”

 

 

 

 

----------

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol. Is there such a thing as a born - again debtor DD?

 

I TELL YOU - YOU ARE READING MY MIND DD AS TODAY MY WHOLE ATTITUDE CHANGED DRAMATICALLY AND I FELT LIKE A WEIGHT HAD BEEN LIFTED OFF ME.

I for one cannot remain gloomy forever and want to simply live!

 

I KNOW THAT I HAVE A LONG WAY TO GO BUT YES - I THINK I WILL SURVIVE.

 

I am taking the fight to the enemy and thanks to CAB will give back more than I get now.

 

Bullies are not so tough when you tie them in knots are they. I aim to do what I can to destroy their ability to wreck families (legally of course.)

 

It also think it helps one's confidence to complain against them all too.

 

I am learning anyway and that's the vital thing.

 

 

xxxxxx

 

get the gloria gaynor record out then eh!

Link to post
Share on other sites

DD BB CRAPSTONE

 

You peps are life-savers and I can diig what you say CP about the troubles that this stress brings to families. Our has survived it but many don't.

 

I an not sitting on my hands though - I am writing complaints to others and I find this also helps to build confidence up.

 

The worst crudites have now had the DD letter to call their bluff over the CCA and BOS are aware they are in default on all accounts. Crudite Solutions are getting a nice complaint also.

 

Like I say folks - I am learning slowly so lets see what postie brings next.

 

DD - good luck in the wigwam. :grin:

 

PS DD, just a thought but what happens if the worst crudites do manage to produce a lovely shiny CCA doc and say ok - come and see it? I only ask as I would not know if it was a genuine article or not.

 

the first thing i would do is look up in the sky to the east....

 

the last time something like this happened there was a bright star there!

 

then i would go see and copy it

 

then if it was genuine i would plead poverty and offer them 5 quid a month or a quick F & F

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone received the text from 1st Credit offering 30% off your account if you settle with them before the end of July?

 

I've not paid them a penny or corresponded with them for nearly four years, so they must be mad to waste their time with me!

 

they are far from mad- they know that the clock is ticking and only 2 years to go!!

 

30% of something is better than 100% of what they'll get in 2 years!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quickie - OH had a card with Citi. They sold it to 1st credit a while ago (I'm pretty sure it was done lock stock rather than them just managing it) who duly passed it on to Connaught to manage.

 

I CCA'd Connaught in about Sept/Oct. After a couple of weeks they said it was being passed to 1st Credit. After another couple of weeks they said it was being passed to Citi. I've heard nothing since.

 

I've just sent Connaught a reminder letter (it's only just occurred to me as we've had a rough few months and it slipped my mind), but I'm wondering if I should also send one to 1st Credit?

 

are you SURE it was sold to 1st credit by citi in the first place- sounds to me like they were just acting as debt collectors- otherwise why on earth would citi want to buy the debt back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah - I suppose the flies gotta eat too, but even they get my sympathy when chomping on a plate full of 1st crudites.

 

:eek:

 

FOS just wrote saying they are dealing with my case against the crudites and to give them any more data if I want to.

 

The point is that the crudites have not honoured my CCA request properly with that bad scanned page and are still harrassing me saying they want me to pay up.

 

Anyone got a good letter to follow up the FOS complaint with in light of this?

 

I do not want FOS to let the crudites get away with this one.

 

DD, should I mention that I have also offered to pay to see the docs, if they exist, as in the last good letter you gave me to use?

 

why not? attach a copy

Link to post
Share on other sites

why not? attach a copy

 

 

It is done!

 

Also keeping their mates at OFT up to battle speed over this one.

 

Is it possible to become utterly addicted to complaining about 1st crudites and other types of odious pond life?

Edited by questioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is done!

 

Also keeping their mates at OFT up to battle speed over this one.

 

Is it possible to become utterly addicted to complaining about 1st crudites and other types of odious pond life?

 

Errrr..yes!

 

Especially when it's free, apart from the odd stamp and a bit of copying. Make them work for their money and make your money work for you.

 

Copy all the relevant letters you have and use highlights and numbers to index your points in a covering letter. The one you posted sounds fine as you don't have to be an instant legal expert, that's the FOS' job. Don't hold your breath waiting for an outcome but they do keep you updated regularly on their progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Crapstone

 

I will keep you up to speed with what happens with this one and the rest.

 

I now only need a hint of trouble to get me complaining in.

 

I want to moan about Rubinson wee too about the way they hounded me for a debt that Crudite solutions had closed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i hAve been dealing with 1st Credit for a while now with help from CAG. It's quite funny as they too keep sending 'edited' copies of an MBNA application form. However, they have recently set Connaught on to me.

 

They have sent a letter saying that they have been instructed by their client to recover this overdue amount.

 

As First credit are in default are they allowed to pass the debt on, even to a sister company? And shouldn't they send me a letter of assignment of the debt?

Edited by Nomore Baloney
atrocious spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

i ahve been dealing with 1st Credit for a while now with help from CAG. It's quite funny as thyey too keep sending 'edited' copies of an MBNA application form. However, they have recently set Connaught on to me.

 

They have sent a letter saying that they have been instructed by their client to recover this overdue amount.

 

As firts credit are in defaultb are they allowed to pass the debt on, even to a sister company? And shouldn't they send me a letter of assignment of the debt?

 

They are NOT allowed to pass it to connartists. Report them to TS and the OFT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

B O ands Snot that took on the bank of scot accounts and have not managed to honour any CCA requests this bank just sent a Your Personal Loan Statement to me and my partner.

 

As you know from the 2 page scan (that only holds my name) a few pages back they gave me that copy of a largely illegible “application” form (according to DD). I told them they were in default and also in default over all the other accounts, which they have ignored my CCA requests for.

 

I cancelled standing orders to BO and Snot last month and yet on the statement from the bank they say that instalments are still going out. Does it take a while for them to stop or..?

 

The interest (about 30-4O- quid a month) on this lot has grown since 2006 when it allegedly commenced and now there is another thousand quid on this one account alone. Initially CAB asked them to halt interest but they seem to have ignored this. This all seems very wrong

 

I cancelled the payments last month, asked for a CCA and they are still banging on MEGA interest and not honouring the CCA requests properly. And I have told then it’s in dispute. .

 

I intend to now ask my bank (RBOS) why they are still paying my tokens to the Bank o S

 

All pretty confusing now.

 

 

ps Utter daylight robbery them banging on up to 42 quid a month interest on an accout that is paying a quid a month tokens too I believe.

 

Just thinking - should I tell Bank of scot that the account is in dispute? I have only said this to their strong arm BO and Snot who are handling the account. Maybe Bliar O and snot have NOT told the bank lads on the other side of the desk?

Edited by questioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just thinking - should I tell Bank of scot that the account is in dispute? I have only said this to their strong arm BO and Snot who are handling the account. Maybe Bliar O and snot have NOT told the bank lads on the other side of the desk?

 

Quite likely, they don't seem to talk to each other. Maybe there's a screen inbetween them or something?:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite likely, they don't seem to talk to each other. Maybe there's a screen inbetween them or something?:)

 

LOL.

 

:lol:

 

I have slips from my RBOS saying that the standing order was cancelled effective from 22 June yet the payment of a quid was received, according to the Bank of S, on 22 of July. Odd?

 

Another funny thing is that on a monthly basis the interest since last autunm on this account had dropped a quid per month from 43 to 36 quid - why?

Edited by questioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

As First credit are in default are they allowed to pass the debt on, even to a sister company? And shouldn't they send me a letter of assignment of the debt?

 

Maybe tell 'em ...................

 

I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to xxxxxxxxx for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as xxxxxxx cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities. If xxxxxx chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Tradings Collection Guidelines

 

I suggest that you demand that xxxxxxxxx must HONESTLY clarify this issue for you so that your company does not progress into yet more breaches over the current CCA regulations, which I may be forced to report to the governing authorities.

 

The onus is clearly on your company to address this issue rather than expect me to spend time, expense and inconvenience herein.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

i hAve been dealing with 1st Credit for a while now with help from CAG. It's quite funny as they too keep sending 'edited' copies of an MBNA application form. However, they have recently set Connaught on to me.

 

They have sent a letter saying that they have been instructed by their client to recover this overdue amount.

 

As First credit are in default are they allowed to pass the debt on, even to a sister company? And shouldn't they send me a letter of assignment of the debt?

 

you would only be " informed" (that is all they have to do) of an assignment if the debt had been assigned to someone else (and who was able to legally operate the account if still live)

 

There is nothing to stop a creditor selling your debt whether in dispute or not to someone else but the dispute goes with the debt to the new owner

Link to post
Share on other sites

so best to stick with dispute rather than serious dispute?

 

I want to learn

 

PS - as I asked before - do I have to write to bank of scot to tell 'em that the accounts being managed by BO and Snot are in dispute or not? Are they not supposed to tell their client, over the desk, what the hell is going on?

Edited by questioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

so best to stick with dispute rather than serious dispute?

 

I want to learn

 

PS - as I asked before - do I have to write to bank of scot to tell 'em that the accounts being managed by BO and Snot are in dispute or not? Are they not supposed to tell their client, over the desk, what the hell is going on?

 

it's no big deal but if (as i suspect) that there is no legal significance in it then it makes you look just that bit more knowledgeable when you write to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...