Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Diskmandave-vs-Lowell Finacial (CapOne)***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I thought I should start my own thread on this!

 

 

1st, I got a letter from Capital One, sold 5 & 1/2 yr old debt to Lowell Portfolio 1 even though account is in the highest state of dispute.

 

2nd, stern letter from Lowell Financial demanding payment, "today".

 

3rd, put 1 & 2 straight into cross cut shredder...

 

4th, phone call from Lowell Financial, everso polite but *MUST* agree debt exists and agree a repayment programme!

 

5th, Tell Lowell, account is in highest state of dispute, Lowell agree's that for payment of £10.00 (S.A.R.) ALL PREVIOUS STATEMENTS will be sent.

Told Lowell's that account should not have been sold whilst in dispute...

 

5th(a) Still no previous statements received....

 

6th, CCA Request sent by Registered Post, and stating account is in the highest state of dispute.

 

7th, & most surprisingly.............!!! Reply by Lowell.........

 

(i) Letter to Lowell Finacial (Leeds), My letter to Lowell Financial:

 

Mr David Xxxxxxx,

4x YyYyYy XxGgVe,

Ashton Under Lyne,

Lancashire,

OLX XXX.

 

Reference No: XxXxXxXx

 

08/01/2007

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I refer to letters dated 25/12/2006 and 03/01/2007 which were both recieved today in

respect of a very old Capital One account. I am informing you that this account is still in

dispute and that it was indeed Capital One whom breached the agreement, not me. I trust

that you will not further attempt to collect any alleged outstanding amount whilst there is

a dispute still in force.

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

I do not acknowledge ANY debt to your company. I require you to supply the

following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to.

This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under

the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 -

(s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit).

I enclose a cheque to the value of £1 in payment of the statutory fee. This is not to

be applied as any kind of payment to the disputed account.

 

2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement

that you allege exists.

 

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the

original creditor or not under S189 of the CCA 1974.

 

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will

result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

 

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the

customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to

any court claim that is issued.

 

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both

vigorously defended and contested.

 

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

 

 

XZXZXZ YVYVYVYVYVYV..

 

 

 

 

(ii) REPLY RECIEVED,

 

Dear "diskmandave",

 

16/01/2007

 

RE: Lowell Portfolio I Ltd

 

We are in receipt of your request for a copy of your credit agreement in this matter in accordance with Section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

We are also in receipt of the prescribed fee from you.

 

We are requesting a copy of the agreement from your original lender with whom you originally entered into the agreement.

 

Whilst we will endeavour to reply to you with the required information within the prescribed "28 day period" under the Consumer Credit Act you'll appreciate this is dependant upon receipt of the information from the original creditor.

 

We will advise you further if it will take longer than the prescribed period and the reason to supply the required information.

 

We trust this meets with your satisfaction.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Nigel Bearex(?) (closest guess!)

edit: Nigel Beaven

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------

 

Back to reallity now!

 

I'm just guessing that Lowell's haven't got either the CCA or the deed of assignment???!!!

 

So, what do I do next? Write back NOW, stating.......?.. What? Do I write

back NOW stating multiple Criminal Offences, or just wait for them to commit the 30 day CCA criminal offence???

 

? They shouldn't have bought the debt whilst it was in dispute, without a copy of the original CCA, and without a deed of assignment...?!!

 

I'm just guessing that i'm in a total win/win situation here...?

 

 

I do hope that this is of some help to anyone who has just got Lowell's chasing them!

 

In the mean time, can anyone suggest a letter that I send to Lowell's next?

I will keep it updated here...! :-):)

 

 

Best regards - Dave...(diskmandave)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Diskmandave this reply you got is standard and yes is more than likely they wont supply agreements i would personally leave it at that and wouldnt remind them especially not before the criminal offence has occurred. What you want to do then depends on what you want from this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Diskmandave this reply you got is standard and yes is more than likely they wont supply agreements i would personally leave it at that and wouldnt remind them especially not before the criminal offence has occurred. What you want to do then depends on what you want from this.

 

Thank You :)

 

But, haven't they committed criminal offences already? They haven't got either the CCA or the deed of assignment! And they've allegedly bought this debt from Capital One...? They're having to send (by their own admission) to the original creditor for the doc's that i've requested....

 

I appreciate your reply, is it from personal experience?

 

Thanks & best regards - Dave (diskmandave).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is, recently lowell bought some old debt from capital, i sent cca and i also got this letter you got, mines was sent some 15 days ago, they are in default but not created a criminal offence yet, i will review my situation once they go over this deadline or whenever they provide documents required, whichever comes first, hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is, recently lowell bought some old debt from capital, i sent cca and i also got this letter you got, mines was sent some 15 days ago, they are in default but not created a criminal offence yet, i will review my situation once they go over this deadline or whenever they provide documents required, whichever comes first, hope this helps.

 

I wish you the best of luck :):):)

 

Regards - Dave (diskmandave).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes seen that but truth be told they arent going to get these documents required and are going to create a criminal offence, then if they get say 5% of what they bought paying up they will make more money than what the debt actually cost them, some people have actually requested any monies paid to that account to be returned as there is no agreement, personally my debt was the wifes credit card and its approaching 6 years now, only a small amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes seen that but truth be told they arent going to get these documents required and are going to create a criminal offence, then if they get say 5% of what they bought paying up they will make more money than what the debt actually cost them, some people have actually requested any monies paid to that account to be returned as there is no agreement, personally my debt was the wifes credit card and its approaching 6 years now, only a small amount.

 

So, really speaking, a stern letter after offence has been committed, (or even now, see all above), will get debt written off? I'm still peeved that the original CapOne account is in the highest state of dispute and they've dared to sell it!

 

Best Regards - Dave (diskmandave).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its never written off just legally unenforceable until they produce the documents required to substantiate the debt this remains the case.

The point is after 12 working days they are in default and even if they find the documents after this time but before the 30 days are up you can tell them no as they defaulted, they would need to go to court to legally enforce the debt which they may, but it adds more weight to your chance of them not doing this if they commit a criminal offence then find the documents as the judge would take a rather dim view of them regarding their handling of data and can fine them £2500 or even imprisonment, this i believe is what most people will do when non-compliance is after the 30 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its never written off just legally unenforceable until they produce the documents required to substantiate the debt this remains the case.

The point is after 12 working days they are in default and even if they find the documents after this time but before the 30 days are up you can tell them no as they defaulted, they would need to go to court to legally enforce the debt which they may, but it adds more weight to your chance of them not doing this if they commit a criminal offence then find the documents as the judge would take a rather dim view of them regarding their handling of data and can fine them £2500 or even imprisonment, this i believe is what most people will do when non-compliance is after the 30 days.

 

Thanks so much for your replies! This is all new to me! I'm so fed up after nearly 10 years of hell and near nervous breakdowns that i'm actually going to bed now and not being able to sleep through pure excitement, rather than absolute dread!!!

 

The 2 debts that currently i'm contesting are Lowell and BLS Collections, and from what you say, are now both in "default". I'm not currently paying

anything to Lowell (Cap-One), but, BLS i've been paying £8.00/M for ages!

Should I stop paying BLS? What I need to know is, what do you mean when U say, "in default?". When the CCA request is in default, what does that mean to me???

 

Best Regards - Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does take some time to request statements and agreements from the original creditor so it buys you a lot of time. When Lowell buy debts its not practical to get the agreements and statements shipped over as lowell own hundreds of thousands of debts

Link to post
Share on other sites

whilst in default you are disputing the debt until they provide the documents required, you should not pay them whilst this situation remains, although you should put it by incase they turn up with documents and threaten to have it legally enforced as you would be expected to pay what you missed, however as i said earlier if this is after 30 days then the choice is yours.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 12 days now from the date the letter was signed for, or 14 days from the date on the letter (12+2), i'm guessing either way it's now in default? I'm guessing that the letter can be deemed served on the day it was signed for?

 

Do I write and tell them they're in default or just let the clock keep ticking?

 

Regards - Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Sandrock, if you have entered into any sort of arrangement to pay, keep going til the 12 days have passed and they are in default, so you can then stop paying.

If no arrangement is in place, then personally I wouldn't pay anything til they prove the debt.

Saxon

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just a thought, should I be putting in a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

to Capital One as well? Because more than 50% of the alleged outstanding debt is charges.

 

I'm sure I read somewhere that now they've sold the debt that they're not allowed to credit it to the sold account???

 

Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: Lowell Financial are now in default of my CCA request :p

 

But whilst checking my free trial Credit Report, and I don't want to digress to much, my file is clear but there's 3 X "unverified reason" by Camelot Group PLC and the address matches that of The National Lottery head office!!! :eek: I do remember "looking" at playing the lottery online method but what on earth are they doing a credit search on me for?! :confused: :idea:

 

Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know why Camelot are in my credit file?

 

Update: Lowell Financial are now in default of my CCA request :p

 

But whilst checking my free trial Credit Report, and I don't want to digress to much, my file is clear but there's 3 X "unverified reason" by Camelot Group PLC and the address matches that of The National Lottery head office!!! :eek: I do remember "looking" at playing the lottery online method but what on earth are they doing a credit search on me for?! :confused: :idea:

 

Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...