Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

UKPC 06/04/2018 windscreen PNC claimform- residential parking in my own space - forget permit ***Claim Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am hoping someone can give me clarification and how to approach as there is a lot of info out there and not sure if regulations have changed.

 

I live in a block of flats where I own a flat and dont rent and have a designated parking spot. Stupidly I didnt stick my permit to the screen and just let it rest on the front and it must have fallen off. Regardless it went missing and last Friday morning at 6am I received a parking ticket from UKPC.

 

I am not sure how to approach and whether I should email UKPC to appeal and explain my situation and hope they take some sympathy.

 

Would appreciate any advice.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 The date of infringement? 06/04/2018

 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] No

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] Not Applicable

 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, Not Applicable

 

5 Who is the parking company? UKPC

 

6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Not a carpark, it was in my designated space outside my block of flats in South Harrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your ownership of the flat probably gives you supremacy of contract over the UKPC clowns as your space is designated. Who employs the PPC, council, or managing Agents?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

await the NTK before you do anything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I once lived in a property with one these 'designated parking spaces' and it turned out that you actually bought the parking space with your property so it was owned by you.

 

Worth checking your deeds to see if that's the case then you can laugh at any PPC invoices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's flats so I assume you own it Leasehold?

If you own the flat leasehold any 'ownership' of the designated parking space is likely to be leashold as well, and therefore the use of it subject to conditions in the Lease (if there are any). So you also need to check what the Lease says specifically about the parking space.

 

I dealt with this recently for my mother and when I read the Lease closely it did say that my mother had the right to park in her designated parking space but went on to say "providing that the leaseholder complies with the rules for the use of the parking space issued from time to by the freeholder"

- something on those lines, can't remember the exact wording.

 

What that meant in practice was that the freeholder had the right to implement a parking scheme at the flats that required parking permits to be displayed and take action if it wasn't.

 

Whether the freeholder's scheme actually complies with the lease, and whether the parking contractor has complied with the freeholder's scheme, and whether the signage is clear etc, all that has to be established in the normal way of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice all. I will check my paperwork today from the completion to see if I can find anything.

 

Yes thats correct, I own it leasehold.

 

My understand it the managing agents employs them, as they are the ones I used to get my permit.

 

There is clear signage, and it is completely my fault, I just hope that common sense prevails as no one has lost anything by me parking my own spot and it was an honest mistake. I will get it stick to the windscrew once my replacement permit arrives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPC's don't do common sense. Never have and probably never will. There's no profit in common sense :|

 

 

However, if your lease gives you the right to park in your space, there are plenty (and I do mean plenty) of persuasive cases online should UKPC decide that they'd quite like to waste some money and take you to court over this.

 

Let's wait an see exactly what the lease says first and then we can go from there. And as you've already been told, do absolutely nothing as regards to contacting UKPC until a NtK lands on your doormat.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks DragonFly

 

I guess the only reason I want to contact them know, rather than when the NTK arrives, is that if I appeal now then they will freeze my 14 day period for the fine, meaning that I would have to pay £60 rather than £100 after this 14 day period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

where does it say FINE please?

 

and you wont be paying anything anyway so no need to appeal now.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks DragonFly

 

I guess the only reason I want to contact them know, rather than when the NTK arrives, is that if I appeal now then they will freeze my 14 day period for the fine, meaning that I would have to pay £60 rather than £100 after this 14 day period.

No no no, you don't want to ID yourself as the driver at this stage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

meaning that I would have to pay £60 rather than £100 after this 14 day period.

 

Well, you really have 3 choices here.

 

Pay £60.

Pay £100. Or

Pay £0.00

 

Personally, I know which one I'd choose, but I suppose it's your money :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I agree with everyone here (so far) If you appealed now, you will have identified yourself as the driver which then gives the parking company up to 6 years to chase you. This is why we say wait for the NTK.

 

Please read your leasehold agreement thoroughly, especially regarding your parking space. A lot of management agencies make these contracts with parking companies without knowing the rules.

 

Were there any parking restrictions when you moved in or were they introduced afterwards? If it was the latter, did the management company consult the tenants?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where I was located the company that managed the leasehold properties employed a PPC without anyone's knowledge including the lease owners.

 

We all started getting PPC invoices (not fines) and they even sent them to me as I did not have a parking permit in my car because I didn't need one.

 

My parking space was tacked onto the end of a row of spaces for the leasehold flats but I lived in the house on the end of the next terrace.

 

Here is a map link and my house is the one with the wheelie bins up against the fence and my parking space is the one in the row nearest the wheelie bins

 

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5657076,0.1244451,3a,75y,202.45h,81.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swaTdartzsBjrMZDskpMNaA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

 

This estate was built in 1985 (usual crap 1980's timber framed rubbish and poor estate design) and I lived there from 1987 to 1993 and the PPC never stopped in that time.

 

I owned my home freehold and I owned my parking spot as well, named and shown on my deeds as private owned property.

 

The PPC did not care about that though, they carried on trying to claim money from me for parking on my own land.

 

This was before POFA though so it was easier to just ignore them which I did and I built up a pile of their invoices and begging letters and threatening letters.

 

POFA or not the PPC and Property Management Company cannot agree any contract which trumps your lease or freehold.

 

Read that lease, make sure there is no mention of a parking management scheme and then come back here with the information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go dbuck, have a little light reading :wink:

 

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=ukpc

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Thanks for sending the link DragonFly

 

I managed to find the lease.

 

In the first few pages I came across the below section which I have attached. It says that the property is my flat together with parking space.

 

Is there anything else I should look for, there was a lot of stuff int he lease. Couldn't find anything about them hiring UKPC or equivalent.

 

Thanks

 

lease extract.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing else is needed. You now have everything you need to beat these clowns.

 

But, you may as well have some fun doing it :wink:

 

 

Sit back, relax and allow them to waste their money sending you demand after demand, and then begging letter after begging letter. Let them get all the way to a Letter Before Action, and then you go back and start to wipe the floor with them.

 

The only way that they'll ever learn is through defeat after defeat, in court if necessary.

 

You have supremacy of contract. They have nothing but hopes & dreams. :lol:

 

 

Edit to add: I've unapproved your attachment, it basically has your full address on it. Might be better to cover those parts and then upload it as a PDF file :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciate all your help.

 

Great will report back as the letters chasing start to come through.

 

You say they need to learn in court, but even if I am likely to win I dont want to go to court just on the off chance. Is this likely to get all sorted before that?

 

In the meantime I should have my replacement permit arriving so at least I can avoid any more of these tickets.

 

The address that was on the attacment is for the management company so all good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a world of common sense, you'd certainly hope that they'd realise that they've made a goof and cancel the ticket. However, when you're dealing with a PPC (any of them) common sense is in VERY short supply. I think they keep it in a locked drawer and have lost the keys!

 

The only thing that you can do to (hopefully) stop them taking you to court is to appeal once you get the NtK. You have very good grounds for an appeal, but you really don't want to identify yourself as the driver (hence waiting until you receive the NtK) as that only removes any protection that you get from the POFA 2012.

 

As I've said though, common sense and PPC's are not often bedfellows, so they *might* still want to try and get the money out of you, ultimately at court. But, there's not really an 'off chance' of you winning. You'll beat them hands down and would also have a good case for a counter claim for their trespass in to your parking spot and their breach of the Data Protection Act, plus your costs.

 

All in all, could be a grand day out and all at their expense :lol:

 

:thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you all had a nice weekend.

 

Just to add to this. I now received another parking ticket even though the management company told me they put me on an exempt list till my permit arrives. Cant say I am suprised. Will just wait till I get the NTK form and then take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can always count on UKPC to keep your hamster supplied with bedding :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That will coat UKPC anohter £4 to process for no reason whatsoever. Let the management co you are thinking of suing them for trespass because they are the ones who allowed these bandits onto the common parts. The persuasive case is Davey v UKPC so rub their noses in it and let them know it will be about 10 grand out of their wallet if they dont get their act together and stop UKPC's appalling behaviour

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi All

 

So further to the above, finally after a few months I received some communication from UKPC. A letter in the post Re: Notice to keeper as the subject.

 

Should I ignore this or not?

 

Any help appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...