Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

F&Fsecured loan with Elderbridge - coerced debt and selling house


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well done you i'm going to recommend we announce this too.

 

i've merged your old thread for history

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • Replies 509
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello all, well its ben a while since I've been back here - been having a battle with FOS and Elderbridge!

Long story short 

- back in 2018, my neighbour who also had a first plus loan originally had her balance reduced to nil after Elderbridge tried to repossess. 

In the meantime I had a complaint with the FOS and stopped paying in 2018,  it finally got to the end and the FOS said that they could not do anything as my case had been to court  - this took approx. 4 years! 

I decided to do an N244 application to vary the original judgement. that went to court in April and was dismissed by the judge because of the length of time passed since the judgement - even though a lot has changed since then and I was pretty lucky to get that! they also said EB would have to start new proceedings etc. Obvs they're not going to do that!.

18 months ago my husband and I split - it is an abusive relationship and i want out - in order to do that we need to sell, he refuses to leave the house without his share but neither of us think we should be paying the redemption figure they've given of approx. 140k, and my ex refuses to even sell unless we can get a reduced settlement agreement with them which effectively traps me here.

Can anyone help me with what to write in my letter - writing it in a way to make it appealing if that makes sense.

I was thinking about adding this that I found.

It seems there was a case where the person had an open account but had not paid or acknowledged in 12 years and went to court where they found the loan Co could not chase them and the charge was removed.   

Now obviously we've acknowledged recently but I was thinking of adding a line in the letter to say that I'm making this offer in full and final settlement of the account, if they don't accept or negotiate in some way and we agree a figure I will stay in the house for 12 years and will not pay another penny or acknowledge the debt again and then apply to land reg to have the charge removed.

I think these are the parts of the legislation that apply.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58/section/15 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58/section/17

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58/section/20 

 https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/ashe-v-national-westminster-bank.php

And I would also agree to sign a Non disclosure order and no claim for compensation in the future 

Can anyone help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have merged this new thread with the old FOS one so people can read the full history if they wish......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Everyone.  

It's been a while I was here before due to long running battle with first plus/elderbridge and the interest rate argument.

My husband and I have separated and are selling the house.

We were together for 20 years and it took that long for me to realise that he is a narcissist and everything he did during our relationship was abuse, we separated about 2 years ago but due to finances and the first plus/elderbridge complaint still ongoing we could not sell etc. Things after this got very nasty and  about 18 moths ago I had to call the police due to his behaviour and then take out a non molestation order.

Looking back at emails and texts message from him I see everything in a new light, I was young and naïve when we met (he was 6 years older and had been married and had a child before) and love bombed me and then I got pregnant and we moved in together within 6 months! 

But to cut a long story short, he is a gambler and not a good one!  he is also a taxi driver.   In the time that we have been together he has coerced me to get into debt - he's asked me to apply for payday loans for him, credit cards and worst of all every time he needed money for cab repairs,  or money he'd lost gambling he would make me ask my mum (because he knew that she had money saved)  which stupidly I did.    now it comes to selling the house and he has said he has no intention of paying my mother back!

We never signed anything, but my mum sent a breakdown and listed reasons for each loan - mostly it's the costs of two taxi's and repairs to those taxis and sometimes tax payments (because he never put that money aside!)   I have text messages and emails going back a few years where you can see he made me ask her - it's hard to explain but it was a lot of guilt and saying that he felt depressed and that my mum lending him the money for this that and the other would make him feel better and he would be a better person etc etc - I'm an idiot for believing any of it and I see that now as his true personality has come out more and more as he is saying he has not signed any agreement therefore will not pay my mum back out of the sale of the house, he has however on many occasions in text messages and emails said that her would pay her back when the house was sold in the future (obviously this was before we split)

Once the house is sold I have calculated that we would be left with approx 65k each after paying her out of the proceeds, he complains that this is not enough for a deposit to buy again.  he looked at buying me out but the payments would have been too high,  and that was borrowing probably the same amount that it would have been to buy me out so i can' see that he's going to be buying anything any time soon - especially as rate are so high anyway and also he's 52 so is hard anyway!

I have found a place to rent so 65k is enough for me, I don't plan to buy again yet.

But my question is

what can I do about his refusal to pay my mum back what she is owed.

The amount is 80k

Can I ask the conveyancing to hold the 80k back or even his half that he is disputing? and I pay her my half - I am not denying that I owe it to her and I never would - he clearly has no morals.  The thing is once that money reaches him he will make me take him to court for it.

And this part will sound awful but I want to tell him that paying his half back to her will cost him a lot less than the alternative (he has been a taxi driver since 2009 - so nearly 15 years and has not declared his earnings to HMRC for at least 8 of those years!)  I don''t want to go down that road but if it was the other way round he would not hesitate!

Any suggestions of what else i can do?

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to F&Fsecured loan with Elderbridge - coerced debt and selling house

re titled and merged with your historic thread.

why not just do it and let him goto court for it if he's that brave and wants it all to come out infront of a judge?
dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

I'm not sure what you mean exactly - the house is being sold it has to be so that we can move on.  let him just do what?

I need to make sure he can't get rid of the money or hide it,  he will make it very difficult for me.

I really need to know if I have a leg to stand on re the debt he owes my mum - if I Can show that he has acknowledged it before and has said he would pay it back is that enough?  I can can show emails and text messages - one of the emails is where her blatantly coerced me into asking her for 25k 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry i read that it had been sold.

how is he gonna get his bit? cant you just give it to your mum...:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah no not sold yet.

Well that's sort of my question. 

 He told me he wants his all money sent to his solicitor and that any claims for money that is not secured on the house will have to go to court,   

he told me that his solicitor asked for me to send him any agreements that he had signed for this money he owes my mum, of which there isn't any and he knows that,

I sent him one of the emails where he acknowledged that he owed her money and said he would pay it back when the house is sold,  as well as screenshot of that money coming into our account and being paid out to people he owed that was about 5 years ago when we had decided to sell the house to clear debts and start a fresh! 

that's when he started making suggestions of asking my mum for another 25k to clear debts instead so we could stay, and that he would change and be a better person - and me like an idiot believed that.

What I'm worried about is that anything done before the house is sold and completed will make him pull out of the sale to spite me and he will sit here and I will still be liable for half the mortgage and be paying rent at the same time. 

I need the sale to go ahead and thought that I could have the disputed amount held back by the conveyancing solicitor. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:noidea: out of our league i feel.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...