Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry but that letter needs to be much much better. you need to express that it was a stilly youthful mistake trying to be the big man and jumping the turnstile to look big infront of your peers. TfL prosecutors are on the email address on their first letter. get the court form sent back to the court , (but copy it first) stating you plead guilty and wish to attend to address the judge in person face to face to show your genuine remorse for your stupid youthful exuberance.      
    • I thought I should send the begging letter to the prosecutor. Does the hearing means the time I need to send back by? If so, it’s June 5  I plan to send the new begging letter as following, can I ask for some suggestions? Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,  Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.  I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.  I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.  Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.  I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.  I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.   Yours sincerely,
    • LoL Dx you crack me up. Thanks for the advice. I'll stay positive.
    • Utter Rubbish!! lowell dont write and beg for deals once they start court. as for your attitude, we'll thats nothing new for you.😎 you wont be quizzed, it's not like TV, simply refer to your defence/WS when answering anything the judge may ever ask. well it involves chickens. dx  
    • Thanks fk, I hope I don't have to face the court. Bless you for the reassurance. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Compliance Order - Scottish Courts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Can anyone advise best way to proceed for a compliance order relating to a long overdue SAR

They (Council) wrote me to notify of an extension as the request was deemed "complex". Deadline came & went still not a cheep. Wrote a complaint to them to which they did not respond.

Filed a complaint with ICO. ICO have written to the Council. 2 days after the letter was received by the ICO, I received an email from a Council officer implying he had rights of entry to demand discussion of my SAR.  I wrote back telling him he had no such powers & all correspondence must be in writing.

I wish to move directly to obtaining a court order for compliance. Any advice would be greatly received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, köszönöm said:

I received an email from a Council officer implying he had rights of entry to demand discussion of my SAR.  I wrote back telling him he had no such powers & all correspondence must be in writing.

eh> say that in english?

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Council won't comply to my SAR - ICO involved too - want to use court to enforce compliance but im in scotland - help

That's precisely what happened.

The Council officer is a planning enforcement officer - who's apparently dealing with my Subject Access Request. I suppose its some form of bullying as they don't want to fork over my data. Difficult to read it any other way.

He claims he "was asked" to come to my property to investigate a planning complaint & discuss my SAR & that he has rights of entry to do so. This email arrived two days after the ICO notified me they had now written to the council & I hadn't heard anything from them at all since April when they said my request deadline would be extended. 

Has anyone here used Simple Procedure to obtain a compliance order in Scotland for a SAR? Seems to me that is likely the correct route but, I came across a court document from a Sheriff's Court where even the Sheriff stated they were unsure if Simple Procedure was the correct route. They went ahead and made a decision on it anyways though. (Attached) 

 

 

2019-05-06 SPC Claim Ashworth re SAR compliance.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i was already thinking if there were a route it would be using an SPC claim yes, so looks the way to go

luckily ive been involved in numerous SPC claims here so..

as for that person that wants to force entry to interviews you about this, thats wild. there is certainly no such rule allowing that.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forwarded this email from the officer to the ICO but, I don't think they understand what is going on frankly as the case worker just gave me some shpeel about there is nothing in the DPA about who the DPO delegates duties for SAR requests too.

I've been subjected to 17 years of harassment from this Council off the back of vexatious complaints from a handful of mentally ill individuals.

Not a single complaint has ever come to anything in all those years.

One of the vexatious complainants was arrested & convicted on stalking related charges against myself & several of my neighbours a few years ago.

These individuals hide behind privacy policies regarding complaints to the Council & get the Council to harass myself & other neighbours over it. Hence the SAR request.

I requested my case file and all of the details of the complaints made in relation to myself so I can finally pursue legal remedy against the vexatious complainants & sort this out.

However, the Council themselves has acted in a cavalier manner & its my belief they are refusing to fulfil the SAR as legal protection for themselves as well.

Hence why it seems they want to bully me over my complaint to the ICO using these tactics. Not surprising to me frankly as this isn't my first rodeo with this lot & they've used & attempted to use worse tactics than this in the past.

As the ICO doesn't seem to understand what this latest response from them is about, I'm not waiting around for them to do anything. I don't believe the Council will fulfil the SAR without a court order compelling them to do so, so I'm not inclined to wait much longer before taking further action.

Now just want to get all my i's dotted and t's crossed on the procedure and move forward with it,

any advice is appreciated 

Link to post
Share on other sites

though there might be a much bigger picture here.

the council might be correct in certain aspects, the complaint letters against you would need to be redacted as you wont be entitled to know who complained against you. re their own GDPR rights

i dont think this is something this forum should get involved in given the above information 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Overriding legitimate interests is for the DPO to weigh up. Also, Article 6 of the Human Rights Act states individuals have a right to know the nature of allegations against them. Also, if recent complainants are the individual convicted of stalking charges its a police matter, isn't it? If they want to deliver them redacted they can, overriding legitimate interests can be argued later. They also owe me my entire case file. I've received none of it. I've not even had a response to it.

Why do the details of my case come into whether anyone here should help me figure out the Simple Procedure process?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have to agree with dx100uk on this matter.

There seems to be two matters involved here.

1. The SAR and Complaint to the ICO with the action of that Council Planning officer wanting to discuss planning complaints & at the same time the SAR and they Council has the Right to Force Entry.

2. The Harassment over numerous year with different complaints etc although linked to above.

 

That Council Officer has NO right of Entry whatsoever and why is he wanting to discuss your SAR when this matter should be dealt with by the Councils Data Protection Officer and they will have one.

You need to do the following:

1. Update the ICO of the Councils actions especially with that Council Planning Officer (which I note you have done)

2. Formal Complaint to the Council on there failure to date to comply with a SAR and the actions of that Council Planning Officer especially stating they had the Right of Entry to discuss planning matter and SAR and why is a planning officer dealing with the SAR matter when the Councils Data Protection Officer should be dealing with this.

 

I have to agree when it comes to a SAR there will be a lot of information that is redacted due to DPA/GDPR they are not as such protecting these individual you are on about it is that the Council legally due to law can't give you certain information with your SAR so :

1. Certain information with your SAR maybe redacted  or

2. They may not give you certain information but explain why you can't have that information

I can appreciate that you want to take this to Court but also keep updating the ICO on the Councils inaction with your SAR Request and Get that Formal Complaint into the Council about the that Council Officer as well. 

I will mention this when it comes to Councils as I am unaware if you have done this, so what you need to bear in mind is that you also use there own Policies and Procedures against them and the way to do this is by either requesting those Polices and Procedures or looking them up on their website.

When you get what you want you need to think to yourself when you read these 'DID THEY DO THAT' if not mark/highlight that and as you go through these you build up a case to throw there own policies and procedures back at them that they haven't followed. (used this exact tactic with my own Council at the time in Scotland during over a 3 year fight and they lost big time) something to bear in mind for now and in the future.

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, but, I don't require any advice re the Council.

I've a lot of experience dealing with them.

I know exactly what they are due me & I'm well aware of what they'll probably redact but, it doesn't matter, I already know who the complainant will be because it is a fictional allegation. The fictional allegations all come from the same handful of individuals. The police will be involved once I receive the content.

As I said, this is not my 1st rodeo with this lot. I've already won planning enforcement appeals against them for neighbours and all sorts over the years.

Complaints do nothing re the officer, I've already complained about him ages ago & they throw it out and claim they are "overworked" which is the supposed cause they claim of his issues.

This is more of a rogue organisation than any sort of properly functioning public authority.

They aren't worried about the complaints aspect, they're more worried about what else is in my case file regarding their own operations & what I intend to do next about it & so they should be.

I'm here only for advice on doing the Simple Procedure myself because it seems it will come to that as its clear they are obstructing access.

But, so far, I'm quite miffed my posts/titles are being edited here to say things I didn't say & dx says they won't help me anyways. So, I've already reported this thread to be deleted which they haven't done yet. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi köszönöm,

I'll try to explain about the change in your post title...

Bottom line is, it's just for Google.

When users like yourself go looking for help on the internet you type in a query, which Google tries to match up.

Changing / editing a topic title is done in an attempt to make more sense or give more information to google and other search engines.

It just helps other users, looking for help in similar circumstances to your own.

It's no reflection on your own choice of title and no offence is ever intended.

Unfortunately, we don't delete topics, because it might just be this topic that helps someone find CAG for help.

Best of luck with your problem and I'm sure the team will help however they can.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol. So, you don't think Reclaim the Right Ltd. is bound by the GDPR

Dx, who I assume is some sort of moderator already said this forum shouldn't get involved.

So, you only help "some" folk.

Why should my thread help anyone if you're not going to be involved in helping me any anyways?

Anyways, only joined as I saw other folk were doing similar but, in England mostly hence the question.

Then dx wants all sorts of details & then edits my thread & then says this forum won't be involved? lol. 

Don't know what type of operation is being run here but, I've seen enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, köszönöm said:

lol. So, you don't think Reclaim the Right Ltd. is bound by the GDPR

I've no opinion. Not even read the thread.

I only picked up on the concerns raised in your report.

 

34 minutes ago, Nicky Boy said:

I'll try to explain about the change in your post title...

...Is what i said... and it's the only comment I'll be making.

I'll repeat my previous sentiment and wish you all the best for the future.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Compliance Order - Scottish Courts
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...