Yea, check your email Admin.

What here helps anyone?

I've asked for the thread to be deleted as well as the account already.

lol. So, you don't think Reclaim the Right Ltd. is bound by the GDPR? Dx, who I assume is some sort of moderator already said this forum shouldn't get involved. So, you only help "some" folk. Why should my thread help anyone if you're not going to be involved in helping me any anyways? Anyways, only joined as I saw other folk were doing similar but, in England mostly hence the question. Then dx wants all sorts of details & then edits my thread & then says this forum won't be involved? lol. Don't know what type of operation is being run here but, I've seen enough.

Thanks, but, I don't require any advice re the Council. I've a lot of experience dealing with them. I know exactly what they are due me & I'm well aware of what they'll probably redact but, it doesn't matter, I already know who the complainant will be because it is a fictional allegation. The fictional allegations all come from the same handful of individuals. The police will be involved once I receive the content. As I said, this is not my 1st rodeo with this lot. I've already won planning enforcement appeals against them for neighbours and all sorts over the years. Complaints do nothing re the officer, I've already complained about him ages ago & they throw it out and claim they are "overworked" which is the supposed cause they claim of his issues. This is more of a rogue organisation than any sort of properly functioning public authority. They aren't worried about the complaints aspect, they're more worried about what else is in my case file regarding their own operations & what I intend to do next about it & so they should be. I'm here only for advice on doing the Simple Procedure myself because it seems it will come to that as its clear they are obstructing access. But, so far, I'm quite miffed my posts/titles are being edited here to say things I didn't say & dx says they won't help me anyways. So, I've already reported this thread to be deleted which they haven't done yet.

Overriding legitimate interests is for the DPO to weigh up. Also, Article 6 of the Human Rights Act states individuals have a right to know the nature of allegations against them. Also, if recent complainants are the individual convicted of stalking charges its a police matter, isn't it? If they want to deliver them redacted they can, overriding legitimate interests can be argued later. They also owe me my entire case file. I've received none of it. I've not even had a response to it. Why do the details of my case come into whether anyone here should help me figure out the Simple Procedure process?

I forwarded this email from the officer to the ICO but, I don't think they understand what is going on frankly as the case worker just gave me some shpeel about there is nothing in the DPA about who the DPO delegates duties for SAR requests too. I've been subjected to 17 years of harassment from this Council off the back of vexatious complaints from a handful of mentally ill individuals. Not a single complaint has ever come to anything in all those years. One of the vexatious complainants was arrested & convicted on stalking related charges against myself & several of my neighbours a few years ago. These individuals hide behind privacy policies regarding complaints to the Council & get the Council to harass myself & other neighbours over it. Hence the SAR request. I requested my case file and all of the details of the complaints made in relation to myself so I can finally pursue legal remedy against the vexatious complainants & sort this out. However, the Council themselves has acted in a cavalier manner & its my belief they are refusing to fulfil the SAR as legal protection for themselves as well. Hence why it seems they want to bully me over my complaint to the ICO using these tactics. Not surprising to me frankly as this isn't my first rodeo with this lot & they've used & attempted to use worse tactics than this in the past. As the ICO doesn't seem to understand what this latest response from them is about, I'm not waiting around for them to do anything. I don't believe the Council will fulfil the SAR without a court order compelling them to do so, so I'm not inclined to wait much longer before taking further action. Now just want to get all my i's dotted and t's crossed on the procedure and move forward with it, any advice is appreciated

That's precisely what happened. The Council officer is a planning enforcement officer - who's apparently dealing with my Subject Access Request. I suppose its some form of bullying as they don't want to fork over my data. Difficult to read it any other way. He claims he "was asked" to come to my property to investigate a planning complaint & discuss my SAR & that he has rights of entry to do so. This email arrived two days after the ICO notified me they had now written to the council & I hadn't heard anything from them at all since April when they said my request deadline would be extended. Has anyone here used Simple Procedure to obtain a compliance order in Scotland for a SAR? Seems to me that is likely the correct route but, I came across a court document from a Sheriff's Court where even the Sheriff stated they were unsure if Simple Procedure was the correct route. They went ahead and made a decision on it anyways though. (Attached) 2019-05-06 SPC Claim Ashworth re SAR compliance.pdf

Hello, Can anyone advise best way to proceed for a compliance order relating to a long overdue SAR? They (Council) wrote me to notify of an extension as the request was deemed "complex". Deadline came & went still not a cheep. Wrote a complaint to them to which they did not respond. Filed a complaint with ICO. ICO have written to the Council. 2 days after the letter was received by the ICO, I received an email from a Council officer implying he had rights of entry to demand discussion of my SAR. I wrote back telling him he had no such powers & all correspondence must be in writing. I wish to move directly to obtaining a court order for compliance. Any advice would be greatly received.