Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robert Dyas missing parts in gym equipment order ..debit card dispute & return of item..


Salford lass
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i will be doing a debit card dispute with my bank this week regarding an item purchased online that has missing parts.

the company has been contacted twice regarding this and I’ve only had the “ give us 3 days to respond “.

my question is

once the dispute is done,

what do I do with the item,

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you tell the supplier to send you a prepaid returns label if they want it back.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Robert Dyas missing parts in gym equipment order ..debit card dispute & return of item..

not your problem...as long as you reported this within 14 days of you physically having it....

if they want it back they have to arrange collection at their cost, else you'll start charging daily storage fees...

check their T&c's... what do they state about returns...??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reported it via online the same day it was delivered, got an automated reply saying they would be in touch within 3 working days…

5 days later I got them on twitter and they sent another reply saying sorry it’s taking long we will be in touch soon,

another 5 days later I got “due to the hot weather our customer services are taking longer than expected “..that was 3 days ago

tomorrow I’m going to start the dispute, once I’ve done it I will email them telling them to come and collect it within 5 working days or it’s going to scrap.

Does this seem fair and legal ?

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 26/06/2023 at 02:30, Salford lass said:

Does this seem fair and legal?

It doesn't seem either of those things really. I understand it's frustrating, but large companies move slowly (despite their own '3 days' statement) and these sorts of issues are dealt with by people who really don't care about you or me.

If you end up getting your money back, either via the bank or via the vendor, you're not entitled to keep or dispose of their property on your own initiative. You may open yourself up to a claim of unjust enrichment if you do that.

If you're going to take that approach, I would advise them in writing at their head office, recorded delivery, giving all relevant details to help them identify you and your order, that you will consider the item abandoned and subject to disposal if they do not make contact with you to make arrangements for collection within 14 days, and I would count that 14 days from the point at which you can confirm the letter is received by their head office.

Frustrating as it is, I wouldn't say you can realistically try to hold them to a timeline you already know they won't meet.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

***update***

sent the letter special delivery and it was signed for 2 weeks ago yesterday…can I now dispose of the item ? I’ve had no response in regards to them collecting it but had an email on the 3rd July saying they are looking into the missing parts

i did a debit card dispute with the bank on the 27th June and it went in my favour 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you post   up the text of the letter which you sent.

How are you proposing to dispose of the parts 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shared

~ 97% (

Ad

0-

о-

27/6/23

Manchester

Email

Order number

Description-homcom muti home gym machine with 45 kg weight stack

Item received on 9/6/23

1st contact with you on 9/6/23 to report missing parts

Auto generated email received saying you would be in touch in 72 hours

You made no contact

Contacted you via twitter on 12/6/23

Received another auto generated email on 13/6/23

No attempt was made by yourselves to rectify this situation

I'm giving you 14 days from receipt of this letter for you to arrange collection of your goods.After this date I will consider this item to have been abandoned and I myself will arrange it's disposal

Regards

 

and I would be giving it to scrappers 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

urm..be careful..thats not necessarily true..

 

dx

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you chargedback if you filed it as damaged/not as described did your bank not ask you to return the goods? Out of interest when was the chargeback raised and when was it resolved?

 

If you didnt file it as that what did you file it as?

 

I'll be able to give a better answer once I know what category your chargeback was

 

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a text/email regarding this? If so please can you post a redacted version hiding any personal information/reference numbers.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Salford lass said:

It was a debit card dispute and was raised on 28th June ,the money was returned to my accounts immediately and the bank didn’t advise about returning the item

as they wont, not their bag.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok -  Just for your reference then you haven't won the dispute.

Your bank has awarded you what's known in the industry as a "Temporary refund/credit."  This is the bank's money that they give you so that you're not out of pocket whilst the bank tries to resolve the matter. If your charegback is successfull, the retailer's bank will be forced to hand over the funds to your card issuer (visa/mastercard etc) who will then hand the funds to your bank. Your bank will then keep these funds, and this essentially acts as a reimbursment for your bank for the funds that they gave you. 

If the dispute is decided in the company's favour then your bank will take back the temporary refund they gave you as they won't have been able to reclaim the money from the retailer. This means that your bank wont lose money in the case of an unsuccesfull debit card dispute.

As someone who works on charegbacks for another bank, the vast majority of disputes are upheld, but some are not. For reference chargebacks normally take 30-60 days however they can take up to 240.

However this changes your situation quite a lot. My guess is that robert dyas are waiting for the outcome of the dispute. If they win the dispute, it's likely they wont respond to you at all, if they lose it then they may try to collect the goods back.

I'd also point out that because chargebacks are often handled by a team higher than generic customer service, it is likely that the customer service are simply told to not respond to your case whilst a chargeback is occurring.

This is common within some companies as chargebacks are very technical from a company response standpoint as there are rules set out by mastercard and the company is required to prove beyond all doubt that they abided by these rules to win. If they can't prove it beyond all doubt they lose.

 I would however point out that robert dyas are part of Retail ADR (a type of medation service). I would therefore recommend you to file a claim with retail ADR for this. This will give robert dyas 30 days (from the date your complaint is accpeted) to provide a response. When they respond you will be able to see what their plan/tactics are and where they plan on going with your case.

You should of course point out that the goods are faulty and they did not respond to you to provide assistance with the damaged part etc. However the point of filing this claim will be that you are able to see what Robert Dyas plan /response is. This service is free and should give you an answer as to why they have done nothing to resolve the situation. If you file i would recommend you to not mention that you filed a chargeback

The only reason I advise this is that if your chargeback is not upheld for whatever reason, you will not only have another means of recourse on robert dyas, but also it is likely in their response that they will tell you if they are going to collect the damaged goods or not.

Any questions please let me know

Sorry to be clear since you've not won your dispute, I dont recommend disposing of the goods at this point

  • Like 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

depending where you got the item from some company's have a clause in their returns policy advising you that you must keep the item safe until they can arrange collection and that the item remains the property of the said company until it is returned, (potentially meaning they could take legal action if you unlawfully dispose of the their goods.)

i already advised earlier what you needed to do...

On 26/06/2023 at 02:01, dx100uk said:

if they want it back they have to arrange collection at their cost, else you'll start charging daily storage fees...

check their T&c's... what do they state about returns...??

and 

On 26/06/2023 at 14:14, theberengersniper said:

If you end up getting your money back, either via the bank or via the vendor, you're not entitled to keep or dispose of their property on your own initiative. You may open yourself up to a claim of unjust enrichment if you do that.

If you're going to take that approach, I would advise them in writing at their head office, recorded delivery, giving all relevant details to help them identify you and your order, that you will consider the item abandoned and subject to disposal if they do not make contact with you to make arrangements for collection within 14 days, and I would count that 14 days from the point at which you can confirm the letter is received by their head office.

Frustrating as it is, I wouldn't say you can realistically try to hold them to a timeline you already know they won't meet.

so you need to WRITE to them stating that from date xxx you will be charging them £ per day storage costs until collected.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...