Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Claim issued against Evri for damaged phone/packaging. - **Paid**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 253 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you did opt to continue  with the existing claim and for the benefit of other users reading, here is the process on filling separate particulars.

Serving Additional Particulars of Claim
If during step 5 of issuing the claim you state that you will serve additional Particulars of Claim, you must send the additional particulars to the defendant(s) within 14 days of your claim being issued. You should also send a covering letter to the defendant clearly advising that these are the extra particulars referred to in your claim form and quote the claim number.


You must file an ‘N215 Certificate of Service’ with the court within 14 days of the claim being issued. The certificate of service confirms to the court that you have sent the documents to the defendant. The certificate can be filed by post or preferably by email to [email protected]. Please include the claim number in the subject line of the email.

A blank N215 can be downloaded from www.justice.gov.uk/forms.
The second page of the N215 explains how to calculate the ‘date of service’. Please note if the date of service is different to that of the claim form, then you should consider the later date to be the date of service for the claim. For further information please see Civil
Procedure Rule 7E.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that is correct but seeing as it is all mucked up anyway, you may as well do your best.

Send the particulars of claim. Do the certificate service and opt for mediation and see what happens.

You're not incuring any further costs until that point at least

 

Also, if you have to withdraw and beginner again you will need this particular's of claim so it won't be wasted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this ok for Particulars of Claim? and please see attached new Certificate of service - is this ok?

1.The claimant contracted the defendant to deliver a parcel to a UK address on the 18th April 2022.
2. Value of the parcel being £190.00, Delivery cost £3.85, Parcel number ........
3. 21st April 2022 Claimant received message stating parcel is damaged beyond repair.
4. 26th April 2022 Filed claim form with defendant.

5. 1st May 2022 received email confirmation of receipt of claim form.

6. The claimant is claiming reimbursement of the parcel to the value of £190, plus the delivery cost £3.85, plus £100 for conversion, plus Court fee £35.

Total claim being £328.85

Regarding Value of package/parcel, will proof of this value be required?

Will the ebay sale evidence suffice?

Regarding Conversion value,

is it required at any point to prove the value and how it is calculated?

If so, how is this achieved?

 

 

 

certofservice.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't alleged the conversion.

Standby for a further response tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't be able to deal with this until the weekend.

Spend your time reading. There is ample time to sort this out

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 21/06/2023 at 19:46, Reg21 said:

Is this ok for Particulars of Claim? and please see attached new Certificate of service - is this ok?

Breach of Contract and Conversion

1.The claimant contracted the defendant to deliver a parcel to a UK address on the 18th April 2022.
2. Value of the parcel being £190.00, Delivery cost £3.85, Parcel number XXX
3. 21st April 2022 Claimant received message stating parcel is damaged beyond repair.

The claimant requested the return of the parcel. The defendant has failed to respond and it is clear that the defendant declines to return the parcel

the defendant is responsible for damaging the parcel and this is a breach of their obligation to exercise reasonable skill and care.
The defendant's wilful failure to return the damage parcel to the claimant is a Conversion under the Courts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977.

The claimant seeks reimbursement of the parcel which is put into the care of the defendant.
The claimant also seeks damages in respect of the defendant's Conversion in that they have wilfully failed to return the parcel – maximum £100 in the discretion of the court.

 

Total claim up to £328.85 – (£XXX plus £100, Conversion in the discretion of the court)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is great, thank you. Wasn't expecting reply till tomorrow.

Do I now need to send these particulars to the defendant?

And also send the particulars along with the Certificate of service to the court?

On the Directions questionnaire, Do I need to only complete parts A1 and B? And send this to the court now as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course you need to send them to the defendant – how else would they get to know about them. Fill in a certificate of service. You can send a copy of that to the defendant as well although it is not necessary.

You can send a copy of the particulars to the court and a certificate of service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put the claim number at the top of each copy and also on the email

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suitability for determination without a hearing? no (that the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally')

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Reg21 said:

Ok, will do.

on the directions questionnaire - suitability for determination without a hearing - do I tick yes or no if opting for mediation?

If no, what are the reasons why not?

I would have hoped that you would have done sufficient reading by now that you wouldn't need to ask these questions.

This is a self-help forum but it depends on people having done a thorough reading and being well prepared in advance of starting the claim – not simply picking up the pieces as you go along

Link to post
Share on other sites

In terms of suitability for mediation, I thought we already made it clear on this thread that normally we would advise against mediation – but given the way that you have handled this case so far and the difficulties with missing documents et cetera, – that the prudent thing would be to go to mediation and see what was said there and maybe get it settled at that point.

Frankly if they settle at mediation then in my view you can count yourself lucky that you are dealing with such incompetence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

From the posts that I have read I haven't seen any examples of the directions questionnaire. I haven't read enough obviously. It sometimes takes me a few goes at reading through some of this material as it doesn't always make sense straight away and therefore takes me a long time.

Right, I will opt for mediation and fill in the rest of the form.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are lots of references to directions questionnaire is and a huge amount of advice.

Also there are some excellent summaries about what to expect if you go through the mediation process. Beware that you will come under pressure not only from EVRi but also from the mediator to compromise on your rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If at mediation they don't object to the missing/late submission of the particulars of claim, then they can be taken to have accepted it and then we can continue as normal to trial.

They will certainly put their heels in on the damages for conversion – but it is absolutely clear that they have contacted you about damaged item and now they are declining to show it to you or to provide you with any evidence of its damage.

There is no doubt in my mind that it has been stolen and somebody has simply marked it up as damaged instead of lost.

It would have been much easier for them to mark it up as lost

Link to post
Share on other sites

Much appreciated. More reading over the weekend. I had read about the mediator pushing for settling for less on one case.

Posting particulars Monday as haven't been able to post. And email the court with the particulars, cert of service and directions Monday to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Documents sent off and emailed on Monday.

Received this email from Evri today.

Also please see their DQ attached file.

The claim number is wrong on the email and on the DQ. 

Dear County Court Business Centre,

Claim No.: K4QQZ90T4

Parties: ********* v Evri

We write in relation to the above referenced matter.

Further to the Court’s Order dated 13 June 2023, please find attached for filing, the Defendant’s Directions Questionnaire.

 We would be grateful if the Court could update its records accordingly.

 The Claimant is copied to this email by way of service.

 Yours faithfully,

 

 Evri Legal Department                          

Defendant's Directions Questionnaire.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim number is wrong???!!

Just a typo wrong – or just Wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And I see that this DQ is signed off by somebody called     another EVRi paralegal who it seems is to have experience with a real firm of solicitors and is now working to deny EVRi customers their claims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update.

Received this email from Evri.

WITHOUT PREJUDICE SAVE AS TO COSTS 

Dear **** ********,

 Claim No.: K4QZ90T4

 We hope this email finds you well.

 We write further to the above referenced claim made against Evri.

 We would like to take this opportunity to apologise for the issues that you have experienced while using our services. In this instance, Evri recognises that the services provided to you have not been in line with the usual high standards that are expected.

 We write with a view to settle the matter and as a gesture of goodwill with no admission of liability, on this occasion, Evri are willing to offer you £230.00 in full and final settlement of your claim.

 If you would like to accept this offer, please provide us with your bank account details, including the name on the account, at your earliest convenience and we will arrange for the payment to be made. Once bank details have been provided, please allow 14 days for payment to be received into your account.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely,

 Evri Legal Department

My costs so far without conversion are ( Item + P&P + court fee ) is £228.15.

My claim is for £228.15 + £100 for conversion - I opted for mediation so will therefore be rejecting this offer and waiting for mediation date.

Any opinions/thoughts on this?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...