Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is not as simple as you seem to suggest. 1. My wife needed the car and there are no local public transport facilities within 2 miles. 2 Neither of us has the technical expertise to change a battery. 3 Not only does the battery itself have to be appropriate for stop/start technology; but also, according to the handbook, has to be registered with Mini by a recognised agent, which I am not, neither is Big Motoring World. 4 The car had to be towed. Where was I going to have it towed to where I could be sure it would be properly dealt with? I couldn't trust Big Motoring World to do it. I couldn't have it towed to just any garage and be sure they had the right battery and the time to fit it. 5 The high sum involved is mainly for the diagnostic test which Big Motoring World asked me to obtain; and they did not initially raise any objection to the car being taken to the nearest main dealer. I would not have got the diagnostic test, if they had not asked for one. So, I understand where you are coming from, but having ignored requests for reimbursement, what else could I have done to recover my lay out?
    • Thank you FTMDave.  I'm happy to make your suggested changes.  I'll wait a day or 2 to see if any of the team have any other suggestions or feedback.  Do I then just email a copies to both UKPC and the court? Lookinforinfo - Unfortunately I am not sure if the signs have since been changed and cannot recall seeing any on the night as it was dark.   
    • The US confirmed it revoked licences allowing the export of some goods to Chinese tech giant.View the full article
    • I can't imagine that EVRi will want a judgement against them on this and based on this argument. I reckon you have a better than 90% chance that they will try to reach out to you before the trial date. They know that what they are doing is thoroughly wrong and dishonest and contrary to law. They are following this thread, of course – and they've already seen this witness statement. I imagine that they are scrabbling around trying to understand how they can extricate this without using too much face. I suppose they will make an offer to you which is a few quid short of your claim in order to say that they were justified in being stupid. Hold out for every penny. It's your money and you deserve it. It's not their money and they don't deserve it
    • New paragraph 47 – If you insert that – and move everything else down then I think you are good to go. Well done on going through the mill on this but it looks pretty good
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Espresso Machine problem - can't find a part


Geronimo1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought a Breville espresso machine VCF107 on August 19th 2021. A few weeks ago it started spitting out hot water from above the filter basket so with a small brush, I cleaned out the area where it fits which often gets coffee clogged in there but it didn't help much. Today, I decided to take a closer look which meant taking off the tanks and other bits so that I could turn it upside down and discovered that the gasket had a gouge in it about 3mm across just at the point where there is an alignment notch in the filter basket. No problem, I thought. I'll just buy a new gasket.

 

I have spent more than a couple of hours today looking for a replacement gasket and although there are gaskets available for most Breville espresso machines, there aren't any for the model I have. I thought that maybe all Breville might use the same mechanism and therefore the same gasket but the one I have has three notches which align with the bayonet and none of those I found have any notches.

 

Anyway, I suppose what it boils down to (no pun intended), is what are the consumer rights, if any given that I bought it 19 months ago, in this situation? I intend to phone Breville to see if they have any spares but I thought it might be useful to be armed with information before I do so.

 

It doesn't help that the company I bought it through seems to be inactive at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

under your consumer rights in the uk a product should last upto 6yrs, now that's debateable dependant upon the product, but you'd certainly expect several years, 

 

so you can quote your consumer rights.

 

gotta a picture?

convert it to PDF and unload it.

 

i work on numerous domestic products and have found most, but yes its hard!! the best Breville help ive always had is actually going outside the UK and phoning france/spain. but ebay/amazon usually have most bits.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

It's a bit late to be dismantling it again but I will do so tomorrow.

 

However, I have searched exhaustively on eBay, Amazon and AliExpress as well as Google Images (which I find much better for finding the right thing visually).

Link to post
Share on other sites

sure know the issues...

superglue time?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have enclosed a PDF showing both top and bottom and one photo showing the gouge with dimensions.

 

I don't know if superglue works on silicone but I'm pretty sure that hot glue would be pointless.

breville-vcf107-gasket.pdf

 

I just spoke to somebody at Breville and they don't have spare gaskets for this model.

 

I was told to reply to an e-mail with various photos showing various details including the receipt and model number etc. and somebody will decide whether they will fix it or not

- so given that it is outside the stated one-year warranty,

 

I don't know what will happen and what I should say if they don't offer to repair it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget warranty, means nothing not worth paper they are written on in the uk.

 

consumer rights and laws are your weapon here and you'll win be it by replacement or refund minus 2 years usage

 

where did you purchase it from?

they are your target.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so last photo inner ring thats the blast thru fault i see? 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought it from an eBay registered business seller (Strawberry Trading) with over 102K sales but they seem to have gone inactive.

 

The blast through fault, as you describe it, seems to line up perfectly with the alignment notches on the filter basket holder and basket - see how it is midway between the notches - maybe a design flaw.

 

I used to have a previous model branded Oster which I bought in 2012 and was exactly the same mechanism but with a different fascia on which the handle kept breaking. I repaired it half a dozen times because I couldn't find one in the UK. I ended up having to buy one for a differently branded model from the US. That one also broke and the machine gave up completely but I kind of like its operation so I bought the similar Breville model.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this one?

 

WWW.EBAY.CO.UK

Welcome to my eBay Shop. Please add me to your list of favourite sellers and come again. Thank you for your business.

 

superglue will be fine - its rubber - superglue loves the stuff - remember the old original lifting a mini on a crane advert from the 70's.

 

just dont use too much, a pin head drop should do, then push the joint together ,if you use too much it will create wall of glue that will crack if squashed, a tiny tiny amount of the glue should soak into the rubber and bond across the surface if you squeeze it together for about 30secs.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that one.

 

Regarding gluing, there isn't any material to glue together as it is just a ragged hole.

 

Anyway, I'm waiting on Breville to get back to me before I do anything. I've also considered trying to find a cheap second-hand one to cannibalise if all else fails.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the gasket silicone?

 

You could take a look at something called Sil-Poxy.

 

It's meant to be a Silicone adhesive, but apparently can be "layered" to fill gaps.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip. I will bear it in mind if Breville won't help.

 

Wow, that stuff isn't cheap. I think I'd be better off buying a second hand one and using the gasket out of that.

Well, I sent the  e-mail to Breville with the photos they requested on Monday and have not heard anything from them yet 

thinking about when I should phone them back but it occurred to me that I am not sure what legislation to quote to them,

not least because I am in Scotland and the company I bought from as well as Breville UK are in England.

 

It may be of little actual difference given that England and Wales say an item should be usable for six years, Scotland say five and I have only had it for 19 months but it would be useful to sound like I know what I am talking about if anybody can guide me, please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Rights Act 2015. The act applies to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (with the exception of section 27). It was introduced to consolidate the previous legislation, to help consumers better understand their rights.

 

https://www.mygov.scot/consumer-rights#:~:text=You have the right to,you when you bought it

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why but my last post disappeared in front of my eyes.

 

Anyway, thanks for the reply. However, my question was really about which jurisdiction applies, that of the seller or that of the buyer?

 

It was interesting to read that he period of reasonable expected use takes into consideration that items like a cheap kettle might not be expected to last as long as higher quality items - that kinda puts companies in a cleft stick because if they try to get out of their obligations, then they are implying that are conceding that their goods are low quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jurisdiction is irrelevant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just saw that my last two posts have been mashed together.

 

How is jurisdiction irrelevant?

 

If I live in Scotland and buy from a seller in England, are my rights the same as if I lived in England and bought from a seller in Scotland given that they have different legislation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no differing legislation..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try telling that to Humza Yousaf.

 

Anyway, I found a legal blog on the subject which seemed to indicate that in the case of debt at least, an appellant in England could not enforce the six year limitation on a respondent in Scotland where the limitation is five years. But the matter was not settled and was due for debate in Glasgow Sheriffs Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 I have only had it for 19 months

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least quote the whole sentence, I already acknowledged that:

 

'It may be of little actual difference given that England and Wales say an item should be usable for six years, Scotland say five and I have only had it for 19 months but it would be useful to sound like I know what I am talking about if anybody can guide me, please.'

 

When the legislation is unclear, as it is when it says 'up to six years' and evidently dependent on the item in question (say, a cheap kettle vs a top brand television), there is obviously no definitive line to point at, so I was simply trying to establish at least which legislation to quote. I'm used to companies finding loopholes so simply wanted to preempt that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats to do with debt nothing to do with consumer law...forget it, up tree wrong barking.

 

as i said in about the 1st few posts, against the retailer you maybe entitled to a refund minus commensurate usage loss

against breville, wont work , they were not he retailer, but the manu.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...