Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Heat Network Rip-Off + Evading Addressing Issue


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 380 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI,

 

I moved into a new property  early 2021. Upon moving in, I was greeted by a company called Ginger Energy who stated that the building has a Neat Network (basically one central boiler, which pushes hot water around to the properties BUT), the hot water doesn't go direct to the taps, it runs through a HIU (Heat Interface Unit). SO they charge us for whatever energy we take out of the network, fair enough.

 

As the months went on I noticed my bills creeping up at an alarming rate (Despite the whole building - the network - running on gas).

 

Upon approaching Ginger Energy, they stated that it's correct and that they were charging me:

0.2850 standing charge

0.2800 / kWh of heat usage

 

I queried this as I didn't see any of the £400 the govt was supposed to help Heat Network users with.

 

There is a grey area in the law which allows the heat network to "pass on a fair amount" of the EBRS which they get to the tenant, so we get 1p / unit (thats it). I have since come to find out that they infact are the ones benefiting from it as they are claiming EBRS whilst we're capped at a low rate.

 

The building gets charged:

 

0.079p / kWh of gas

£12 / day standing charge (for the building

 

None of these savings are passed onto us at all.

 

Last december, we noticed a big spike in our heating bills (the whole building), but oddly on one particularly cold day the central boiler stopped working for a good 18 hours. I took advantage of this and straight away turned on my boiler, opened my hot taps (which were obviously stone cold and heating just ran cold water around the radiators).

 

I did this to see if they would bill us as I wasn't convinced that its being done correctly. Come my bill, I got charged £16... yes, 16 for that day.. As my boiler was left running and was literally taking 1 degree out of the network. They work this out as follows:

 

Main flow = Hot water from the building is measured in m3

Main flow temperature MINUS the return temperature = what I've taken out of the network obviously

 

Which seems fair. They stated that the meter takes a reading once every 15 minutes, so I asked for my enture years worth of readings, shoved them through Microsoft BI and came up with a chart that literally shows that the network under-supplies the heat units to keep them drawing heat.

 

By this I mean that on the heat unit itself, it states CLEARLY that minimum flow temperature is 65C, but looking at the last years worth of readings, 50% of the money I've lost goes towards that inefficiency. This is happening purely because they're turning it down to minimize on has expense and maximize on income through sly trickery...


Keeping the HIU's below an optimal temperature would cause them to constantly try and pump heat around, resulting in extra high bills. I personally keep my house at 17C, its really well insulated.

 

Furthermore, I've noticed that even when my water and heating is NOT in use the units tick up... Ginger energy stated the following:


 

Quote

To even further explain, in the below screenshot you have taken, the water event occurred sometime between the snapshots at 10:45 and 11:15. As the water event wasn’t at the instant the data snapshot was taken, there isn’t a read showing a high flowrate or power draw. However, it is clearly visible by the flow and return temperatures. At 11:15 the flow temperature is up at 51°C, due to a hot water event which has recently occurred, and the water in the HIU is now cooling down again to ambient.

 

Here is a pic to a screenshot of the excel spreadsheet: 

FREEIMAGE.HOST

Image Untitled hosted in Freeimage.host

 

There's no explanation on there at all other than a temperature change, but basic (Heat transfer through a medium of x heat capacity, in this case water) physics:

kW = kg /s (of water)   x   (kJ ÷ kg ÷°C)  x °C
kW = kg / s   x  (4.186 ÷ °C) x °C


Anyway works out nothing like what they're throwing at me.

No where do I see a flow either. 

 

I've approached them about this, but nobody will entertain it. The building management really don't care and point me to Ginger ENergy, ginger energy state they "only handle billing" and that I need to get hold of the landlord (building owner), which happens to be a shell company based in the Barbados. The actual address of the owner (this shell company) is some cottage out behind a farm somewhere in the middle of nowhere. 

 

Can someone give me some advice? As this Ginger Energy is chasing the bills, but there is literally nobody to handle this.

 

Cheers,


Adrian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Is there nobody out there with some handy advice? I'm literally sitting here waiting for advice from ombudsmen, various bodies etc... whislt bills are racking up...

 

Get this, £130 for being at home for all of 4 days this month lol... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...