Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
    • think about it, if you don't pay the full amount, what more can they do , default you  they've already registered a default notice by that point.  why have you got to await sale to a DCA.... for what?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage advice given on unrecorded line


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 474 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

After the initial main advice session, my HSBC bank mortgage advisor had lengthy discussions about repayment vehicles for an interest-only mortgage, which was what I always wanted but the advisor did not, despite being fully eligible for the product.

 

All this discussion about repayment vehicle, he did over his mobile, which was an unrecorded line.

I was always fully eligible and had enough repayment vehicles to get interest-only or part-interest-only mortgages.

 

Can a mortgage advisor discuss an unrecorded line?

Is it legally correct for him to have discussed on an unrecorded line? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This FCA guidance page suggests that retail financial advisors are exempt from the requirement to record phone calls.

 

Recording of telephone conversations and electronic communications | FCA

 

Was this an employee of HSBC? The bank may have its internal rules which might have been broken.

 

Why are you asking? Are you making a complaint to HSBC about the advice given? If a bank employee presumably not an independent advisor but a restricted advisor giving advice only on HSBC products?

 

Did you record the call?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Site Team,

 

Many Thanks for the reply.

 

The link you gave says that phone calls must be recorded, except for internal or back-office communications.

 

A more appropriate link I found that is more relevant o mortgage advise is this 

 

which says, in the last paragraph that the record of mortgage advice must be kept for three years.

 

Yes, the advisor was indeed a bank employee and was advising on HSBC products only. I did not record the mobile call myself, but the advisor admitted in other recorded calls that he made calls using his mobile and the topics discussed.

 

It actually was a real loss to me and I request learned people here to help me with this.

 

Edited by Mountaneer
Link to post
Share on other sites

you will have at least mobile phone call records

 

he MUST at least add notes to your 'file' in the comms log, or whatever HSBC call it.

i would SAR them.

 

see if he left notes.

 

this will add much worthiness to any eventual movement going FWD.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The HSBC Advisor to do with this whether they were in the companies office or working from home that mobile phone number will be linked to HSBC Systems so it may seem that they have called you on a mobile phone when actually they have more than likely done this via a computer using the mobile device all for security purposes.

 

If the above is the case then the call will have been logged and recorded on HSBC Systems as well as that Advisor having to leave notes.

 

Also in whatever search engine you use (google, edge etc) open it and type in the mobile number and see what comes up.

 

I have a friend who works for a large bank in the Mortgage Dept for some years and the above is the setup they use whether working from home or in the office all during the pandemic and even now and all calls are recorded and notes must be left by that advisor.

 

Couple of questions?

 

1. Are you 100% this was an actual Advisor from HSBC if so the above applies.

 

2. If this was a Broker working on behalf of HSBC then the above doesn't apply but they would still have to leave notes of your discussion. 

 

We need to be clear on whether it was 1 or 2 above.

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mountaneer said:

The link you gave says that phone calls must be recorded, except for internal or back-office communications.

 

It says "We also do not expect conversations or communications made by investment analysts, retail financial advisors, and persons carrying on back office functions to be recorded". Mortgage advisors are retail financial advisors.

 

The MCOB handbook also does not say calls must be recorded. 

 

So the answer to your original questiions - "Can a mortgage advisor discuss an unrecorded line? Is it legally correct for him to have discussed on an unrecorded line? " - is yes, it is legal. But he must keep records.

 

Moving on, you say "It actually was a real loss to me..." but not explained what the loss is and what you want to happen next.

 

We can advise your better if you give us the full story. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an HSBC employee and the mobile call was indeed unrecorded. I have raised this as an issue to HSBC in a complaint but at that time, I had no evidence that such unrecorded calls even took place, let alone refer to their contents. There are no notes either anywhere about those unrecorded calls.

 

So far, the progress I have made is to get the HSBC advisor to admit, on a recorded line, that he discussed interest-only mortgage repayment vehicles on mobile. I have obtained this latest call recording from HSBC and have it kept safe with me now. His overall advice was that my application is less likely to succeed and so I had to let my application be Capital-payment, which was already approved by then. I had requested HSBC to let me make a separate application but they said the current approved application will need to be withdrawn.

 

I had always wanted a 5-year mortgage ( as I mentioned in my main recorded advise call ) instead of the 2-year that was already approved. So the loss to me is that I could not lock rates for five years.

Edited by Mountaneer
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/01/2023 at 17:14, Ethel Street said:

This FCA guidance page suggests that retail financial advisors are exempt from the requirement to record phone calls.

 

Recording of telephone conversations and electronic communications | FCA

 

Was this an employee of HSBC? The bank may have its internal rules which might have been broken.

 

Why are you asking? Are you making a complaint to HSBC about the advice given? If a bank employee presumably not an independent advisor but a restricted advisor giving advice only on HSBC products?

 

Did you record the call?

 I called FCA today and they said that the above link is obsolete and has been superseded

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mountaneer said:

 I called FCA today and they said that the above link is obsolete and has been superseded

 

 

Well perhaps they should remove it from their website then! It is unprofessional of FCA to have this page on their website, where it still is right now today, presenting it as their current guidance last updated August 2021.

 

It's not a relevant comment from them though unless they have changed their guidance and now say that retail mortgage advisors should record all their phone calls. Did FCA tell you that is now their requirement, that retail financial advisors must record all their phone calls? Did they point you to new page with the new guidance? If so please can you post a link to the new page. 

 

What else did the FCA advise you?

 

I'm not clear what you are seeking help with. So far the only specfic question you have asked is whether retail mortgage advisors are legally required to record their phone calls. What else would you like help with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did not take me to a new link though. They said that it will be for me to read the FCA handbooks.

 

About the MCOB link that I mentioned above, she said that the link/page is valid as of today, unlike the other one, but refused to interpret the text/sections for me.

Edited by Mountaneer
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mountaneer said:

They did not take me to a new link though. They said that it will be for me to read the FCA handbooks. on MCOB that I mentioned above, she said that the link/page is valid as of today, unlike, the other but refused to interpret sections for me.

 

Doesn't sound as if they have been very helpful. 

 

But back to the question, what advice are looking for here? How can we help you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have lost faith and feel gloomy as to what I can do for justice. Fighting back HSBC in court can be so daunting. Lawyers ask for a hell lot of money to take on the case itself, even to examine it.

 

Tell me please, Is it okay for me to fight myself in court? And wouldn't the judge think that HSBC's lawyer is correct as he is a lawyer? How can I put my case in court without mentioning exact rules and regulation numbers/sections?

 

It is quite natural, to me, that mortgage advisors must have to record or take notes. For a loan running in £500.00K, the advisor has a responsibility and I am sure is legally bound as well. It's just a matter for me to refer to the correction sections in my claim. Possibly lawyers would know.

 

But if someone here could help me with this it will be so helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont need a lawyer and as long as your 'claim' is less than £10k.

it will be small claims, and costs are very limited bothways.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Site team, Thanks for responding but what I mean is that I need to present my argument by referring sections in FCA handbook.

 

Just on a side note, are the directions in FCA handbook legally enforceable?  Please advise on this.

 

Also, would the judge himself be knowledgeable on the matter? In case I am not able to express all the law points in my favour, would the judge know what the legislation holds for me?

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

that will all come out as your case progresses ......within your witness statement later in the process, you will briefly refer to what you need the judge to consider.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh?

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please excuse me if this comes as clumsy question? But I have never seen a court and it is one of the things that I need to know.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

im not sure what you mean by your question at all.

 

if you mean do YOU have to goto court, the answer is yes.

you could have your case decided 'on the papers only' its cheaper, but you'd lose.

 

why dont you hit court claim or small claim

and read.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Ethel Street and DX Team for the answers.

 

I will go to a court hearing if that makes my case better. But in that case, will I be better off with a solicitor to argue my case? Will I be provided with questions from the defence ( HSBC) before the hearing? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont need a solicitor no.

 

and if read up on the court process, using the links i have already provided the answers to the questions like yours  above will all become clearer

 

 

how much are you after?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems to me all you want is for hsbc to switch you to the mortgage you want?

 

strange question , but have you actually, bluntly, in a simple brief letter , asked them?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...