Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gemz Vs HSBC


Gemz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6244 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Still waiting... so will start part two

 

General consensus seems to be, time is running out on bank charge reclaiming. I have a total of £805.50 charges from my parent's joint account but there are several sheets missing.

But do I have 40 days to wait for the statements? It's six months from 2004, three from 2005 and one from 2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT are making a ruling before Easter about bank charges, what is fair and what isn't. It may change the game

 

On-line won't go back that far

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi gemz

 

click into the account in question on online banking.

on the left hand side menu - click my statements

it should give the statement dates in years - when you click onto a year, it then gives you 12 months.

 

hope this helps

  • Haha 1

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm confused gemz, are you talking about the first claim or your parent's claim (i'm just being lazy if the truth's known)

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you get the notice of transfer of proceedings with the aq and defence yet from the court, or have they not defended yet?

sorry, you probably do think i'm being lazy!!

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you tried the judgement button on mcol - even if it let's you press for judgement, the judge usually gives them more time to submit the defence - sad but true. ring the courts and find out what's happening with your claim

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

in a couple of days you will receive from the court

a transfer to your local court

a copy of dg's defense

an allocation questionaire - make a note of the deadline for this.

 

here's how to fill out the aq:

Allocation Questionnaires - A guide to completion a step by step guide

and this:New strategy for Allocation Questionaires and this is how you use the new strat.

for section g of the aq (if it is an N149 - it's section h if it is an N150), use the wording in blue on post #3 of new strategy link, it will fit into the space and then attach draft order for directions printed on another piece of paper and attach to the aq - (also the bit in blue) and be sure to put your own details in the XXXXXXX's - the wording is on post #2 of new strategy link. so that's it - it sounds complicated but it isn't read through the aq a couple of times and use the step guide and add those two bits and that's all there is to it. on the extra page, put your name and claim number at the top.

don't miss the aq deadline - but i see no reason to submit it too early -

if your claim is over 1500, it will cost 100 to file it but that goes onto your claim - you'll get it back when dg offers or if you get a judgment - just add it on. get back if you have questions - lots have filed their recently and lots are getting offers.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Got the paperwork today

 

The claim is for under £1500 so do I tick No on Part H?

 

Also, in other information, should I put that a day in court would cause loss of earning of approx £100 per day?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No to Part H.

 

I would not put anything regarding loss of earnings as generally not recoverable on small claims track. In any event you are unlikely to attend a hearing as the matter is likely to settle prior to then.

 

Ensure you include the Draft Order as the New Strategy in Lateralus' post 94 above.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, this bit right...

 

You should state here that you believe the case will last no longer than 1 hour.

 

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

However, the continuing problem is (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

 

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid end to this litigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...