Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Which amount are Evri liable to pay back for lost parcel


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quick one,

 

I'm about to submit a claim for the full amount of my items value.

 

My dilemma is that for some reason(probably fat finger syndrome) I only stated the item was worth £100 when in fact it was worth £180. It was sold on ebay so I have proof of the items real value.

 

my question is

do I have grounds to pursue the real value or have to settle with the incorrect value I stated when filling out the postage details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Ethel Street changed the title to Which amount are Evri liable to pay back for lost parcel

@Shezza999Please give us the full story about this so that people here can give best advice.

 

I've edited your thread title and changed "stolen" to "lost". If you have actual evidence that it has been stolen I can change it back, otherwise best not to accuse Evri of theft (a deliberate criminal offence) when it's just been lost.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

hit evri and get reading up.

 

your 1st task is a letter of claim after tell us the full story with dates and times upon each stage.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank for you quick responses.

These are the version of events and where I'm at now

 

20th November, sold ps4 and games on ebay for £180

 

21st November, took said item to my parcel shop. Paid for next day delivery and as already stated mistakenly valued the item at £100.

 

22nd November, went back to the parcel shop because the item was not showing the parcel had been collected from said parcel shop. Manager assured me that everything had been collected and had left the shop. Even advised me to get the police involved to come and look at their CCTV.

 

Since then there has been no updates on the tracking. Tracking still showing to this day that the parcel is still at the shop waiting to be collected. This is why I suspect the parcel has been stolen as there is no evidence that the parcel reached the depot.

 

In the mean time I was able to send a message via their Web chat explaining the situation. I received a reply from them stating that they had done an extensive search but could track down the item so classed it as lost and sent me a claim form.

 

This is where I'm at now.

 

I haven't filled in the claim for yet because I'm unsure of the value to claim for. Is it the value I put in when completing the postage details or do I pursue that actual value I received through the sale on ebay. 

 

Unfortunately I only paid the basic insurance for value up to £20 but i know from reading up on posts on this website that it means nothing and they are legally obliged to pay full refunds in cases like mine.

 

I am sorry to have used the word stolen but as the package has not scanned in anywhere then that would lead me to suggest that that is sufficient enough evidence to claim that it has been stolen, and hope that the fact that there is no evidence of the parcel reaching the depot will provide a swift conclusion to the matter and a full refund will be issued without taking the matter any further.

 

I apologise for my grammar and lack of punctuation but I'd be the first to admit I'm not the sharpest tool in the box.

 

So in conclusion,

all I really need to ask is what amount I should pursue.

 

I have spent many hours reading similar situations on this site so I should be OK if further action needs to be taken. I plan on using other members L.o.c's etc as templates and just changing the parts I need to.

 

I hope this has made some kind of sense and look forward to your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that you are probably going to have to settle for the declared value.

If you have done the reading on this sub- forum then you will see that this question has come up several times and I've answered it on the basis that when you contract with somebody you create an expectation. You created expectations with EVRi that they would be responsible for a parcel worth £100 and I doubt whether a court would uphold a greater value.

You can certainly try for the entire sum and see how it goes. I'm not sure what the claim fees are that it may well be that they are the same whether your claim of £100 or £180, in which case there really is nothing to lose.

Then if it goes to mediation as it probably will, EVRi can raise the issue of the value and you can then settle back for £100 and at least EVRi will think that they have gained something and saved some Face.

I suggest that you send an initial complaint to them and explained that they have had your parcel worth £180 and they have lost it and you want reimbursement.

See what they say – but don't give them too long. Maximum 10 days, I would say although don't put any deadlines in this letter.

Of course they will knock you back but it will be interesting to see if they raise the issue of the valuation. After that send a letter of claim.

Post a draft of the letter of claim here before you send it.

None of this is a bluff. You will have to issue a claim so don't start any of the process unless you fully intend to go ahead on the very day that your letter of claim deadline expires – day 15

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Thanks for your reply Bankfodder.I have indeed read the posts where you have addressed the subject of which value to pursue but none have the same circumstances as my case.All the posts I've read the members items have been lost in the 'network'.Theirs had actually been scanned at some point so Evri had proof that their parcel was indeed lost through the process of delivery.I see mine as a completely different situation.Due to there being absolutely no evidence that my item ever reached the depot would heavily support that the item was stolen.Most likely by the collections person who collected it from the parcel shop.Because of these facts it got me thinking I might have a case to pursue the correct value of the item.That said,I thank you for your advice and will follow it.

 

Thanks for your reply Bankfodder.

 

I have indeed read the posts where you have addressed the subject of which value to pursue but none have the same circumstances as my case

All the posts I've read the members items have been lost in the 'network'.

 

Theirs had actually been scanned at some point so Evri had proof that their parcel was indeed lost through the process of delivery.

 

I see mine as a completely different situation.

 

Due to there being absolutely no evidence that my item ever reached the depot would heavily support that the item was stolen.

 

Most likely by the collections person who collected it from the parcel shop.

 

Because of these facts it got me thinking I might have a case to pursue the correct value of the item.

 

That said,I thank you for your advice and will follow it.

Edited by BankFodder
Restructured post to make it readable
Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't seem to have noticed that my site team colleagues – who are volunteers (we all are) – have been taking the time to edit your posts in order to introduce spacing to make them more readable especially on small screen such as telephones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no practical difference between your case and those to which you refer

Link to post
Share on other sites

No,I didn't realise my comments had been edited to make them more readable.

I did comment that I apologise for my lack of grammar and punctuation.My gratitude goes to whoever took the time to correct it.

I will keep you posted on how things progress.

 

Once again,many thanks for your advice.

Edited by BankFodder
Restructured post to make it readable
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Grammar is not a problem. Don't worry about it.

Spacing is pretty important

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,was going to start the claim with Evri but they told me to send all the details to them and they will fill it in on my behalf..Is this a wise thing to do being as a plan to take them to court if the don't cough up full amount?

Here is the part of the email telling me they will fill it in.

 

If you could please provide us with the following details, we’ll fill in the form on your behalf:

 

Parcel contents

Packaging details

Delivery address

Delivery postcode

Selling price/value

Postage cost

eBay item number (if applicable)

So that we can assess your claim, please attach a proof of value for the contents of your parcel, such as a PayPal invoice, scanned receipts, screenshot or a document that shows the payment transaction details.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which form is it that they are proposing to fill in for you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you do a letter

 

Quote

Dear XXX


Formal complaint tracking reference number XXX

this is to confirm that you have lost a parcel which was put in your care on XXX date. The parcel contained XXX. The parcel was properly packaged in a box and properly secured.

The delivery address was XXX and the delivery postcode was XXX.

The selling price/value of the contents were XXX and the delivery cost was XXX.

The item was as a result of an eBay sale reference number XXX

I'm setting this out in a letter of complaint apart from anything else because you have the tracking reference number and all of these details were entered when I booked the delivery. It's clear that you are simply trying to waste time and eventually make some token reimbursement of £20.

I'm giving you seven days to respond with full reimbursement otherwise I'm moving to a letter of claim.

I don't intend to be mucked around.

Yours sincerely

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for that Bankfodder 

they have given me 14 days to make a claim of which 11 remain as I received the email a few days ago.

 

I'm concerned those 14 days will have elapsed by the time they receive and read the letter and result in me not being able to pursue the full refund.

 

Any thoughts on this please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you telling me that you are going along with timescales that they are setting and that you are deferring to them on how this matter should be conducted?

Shameful

You had better have a serious change in your mindset if you are going to deal with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha,

I take it their timescales mean nothing then.

Thanks for that,

 

I suppose it wouldn't hurt to provide them with the information they have asked for and also send them the formal complaint.

 

Will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just the same as any debt collection agency, their timescales are not under any law and they like a DCA have ZERO legal powers to dictate ANY timescales.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...