Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Friend accepted 70% discount offer by lowells on 2 mobile+1 store card debt.....


whitelist
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 580 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not my debt, colleague from work asked for advice

 

She has just received a letter of discount from one of the big debt collection agencies. From what I can tell it is three accounts with different financial companies sold to this DCA merged together with a total liability about 4k. Two accounts will be time barred in 12 months, the largest in about two years.

 

They have offered 70%  discount payable over 12 months @ £100 a month.

 

1/ Call me cynical but why are they willing to stand a 4k loss?

2/ Is it a ploy to get her to acknowledge the debt in extending the Limitations Act? 

3/ Is the formal letter of discount received a contractual obligation (Offer/Acceptance) if she goes on line and sets up a payment account?

4/ On setting up the account, is it wise to ask her to make a debit card payment of say £10.00 immediately to show Consideration thereby a legal contractual agreement secured?

5/ Take it these accounts will still drop off her credit file with recorded default date from the original creditors, and not from when these payments start extending the Limitations Act? 

 

What it does say:

 

We want to help you settle your accounts by offering you a 70% discount if you clear the discounted balance within 12 months. If you are unable to repay the discounted balance within 12 months of accepting the offer, the discount offer may be withdrawn and the full outstanding balance will then be due. 

 

If something is to good to be true, it normally is.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1, yes its about 2

3.yes

4. no dont pay anything

5. correct.

 

this will be lowells.

what are the debts ,. mobile accounts?

 

has she moved since taking each out, and never informed the original creditors nor the DCA of her correct and current address?

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware still at original address these accounts were taken out. Got into debt after havng a baby and simply stuck head in sand. Two are mobile debts the other store card.

 

She is worried if she does nothing they will apply for a CCJ in the future for the full amount

 

The question to ask?

Should she take up this offer or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

god no!!

 

lowells i will guess?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should she not take up the offer>

 

In 12 months prospect of being debt free with no chance of future court action for the full amount?

 

Realise there is a scam in this as they do not make offers  out of the goodness of their heart.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

because it runs the SB date to infinity and she doesnt even know if she even legally owes the debts.

99% of mobile debts are made of the monthly contractual payments due till end of contract = FAKE. ofcom has ruled they are unfair and lowells drop/lose/discontinue most court claims if defended properly , there are 100's of them here.

 

the card debt needs to be questioned by a CCA request but NOT until they send a letter of claim. which they must now.

 

its a phishing letter wanting to find MUGS. there is no discount, it's just had what they know they cant enforce knocked off.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You make a valid point, but the card debt is most of the total debt, just under 4 k and still has four years under the Limitations Act left running.

 

What happens if they substantiate the contract with an agreement, etc AFTER they have instigated an N1 claim for the full amount say in two years' time? She does not have 4k in her bank balance. They will screw her credit rating for another six years and have the opportunity now to get rid of all these accounts, paying £100 a month for one year.

 

It sticks in my throat having to pay a DCA but saving 3k and be free in 12 months seems to good an opportunity to miss.

 

What she needs to know is if she makes contact and sets up an account with this DCA online (No human contact) Can they renege on this offer sent to her in writing after the repayment account activated? 

 

Have to tell her something. She just wants it gone and her decision to make to either settle, or continuing making no contact running the debt clock down.

Edited by whitelist
Link to post
Share on other sites

Up to your colleague really. Agree about DCA's, as they are known for trickery

 

If your colleague does settle at £100 per month over 12 months, what the DCA will do, is that once the last payment has been made, they will record partial settlement on the credit records. Further letters will the follow about poor credit record, damage to rating due to partial settlement.

 

And if your colleague misses 1 payment or is late, they will issue Court claim going for the full £4k.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. What really concerns her is a future claim for the full amount.

After one year it is ended and she can live with her credit record tarnishhed for a further four years until the default drops off

Link to post
Share on other sites

They go after the rest, they always do after they get the debt acknowledged.

 

Await if/when she get a letter of claim 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk

 

You mention that ofcom has rulled demanding sums for the total contractual term is unfair and that Lowell discontinue the majority of claims with mobile phone contracts?

 

Can you be so kind as to link a thread that has used the ofcom statement and Lowell as having difficulty locating due to the vast data and threads on this forum.

 

This is just for my own education and understanding.

 

Will also update this thread when I speak to my colleague this evening if she contacted lowell as accepted their discount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just about any Lowell claimform mobile or telecom thread.

 

Use our enhanced Google search box or legal successes forum off financial legal issues.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update to end the topic.

 

Spoke to her last night at work and she has accepted the 70% discount on the total debt and paid over 12 months via standing order.

Agree with that decision myself.

 

She was worried they would come back in a few years for the full amount and issue a CCJ as the card debt still had four years left to run before becoming time barred..

 

Knowing she has a light at the end of the tunnel and not take that opportunity with the discount was just too much of a gamble.

 

If it had been me, would have held out as they must be aware the debts were unenforceable to offer the discount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing these people don't realise and make far worse for themselves but more importantly others, is it funds the DCA to then harass 10'000 of others 

 

It's free money to them nothing goes off any notional debt. Nor do any original creditors see a penny 

 

Dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whitelist you do realise that Lowells etc buy these debts for something like 10% of the original debt. And that debt would have included probable unlawful penalties throughout the term of the contract.

 

So ask yourself why the debtor buyer would give away 70% of the amount they could claim if they felt that they could make £4000+. Yes it would take more time but the rewards would be much greater. 

 

Your colleague MUST ensure that if they adhere to their side of the offer, that at the end of the year the rest of the debt is written off and will not be sold on to another debt buyer.

 

Perhaps if we had known you were going to go ahead we would have advised you to ask for a lower amount. After all a £4000  debt would have cost probably no more than £400 and they are asking £1200.

 

By pleading poverty but being willing to pay around half might have got them to agree especially if your colleague started talking about how many debt cases fail in court.

 

I am not sure you did them any favours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

could always cancel as its a 12mts agreement.

 

no doubt before month 11 lowells will issue a court claims for each debt for the remaining amount, dangled carrot eaten, debts acknowledged...

 

On 21/10/2022 at 00:54, whitelist said:

In 12 months prospect of being debt free with no chance of future court action for the full amount?

:pound::pound::pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Friend accepted 70% discount offer by lowells on 2 mobile+1 store card debt.....

This is not my debt and it will be wrong to make any decision on her behalf. You have to respect her choice

 

Lowell have agreed a contract in writing to be debt free in 12 months as long as payments are maintained

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

and how is that legally enforceable and what protections are in place if they turn around and say a payment was xx late and the agreement is off??

and where is there a signed agreement by both parties on EACH DEBT ( not just a balance concerning all 3) that they WILL write off the remaining balance of EACH DEBT upon completion..............

 

 

 

.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowell made an offer in  writing

She accepted that offer in writing

consideration made with repayment schedule over 12 months.

Legal undertakings established.

 

A contract can be oral.

Edited by whitelist
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...