Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Appliance Direct(s)? - Non delivery of goods! now asking for ID proof


Surfer01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Daughter who is British and recently from South Africa ordered washing machine and dishwasher.  

 

Paid using a "virtual" credit card and the company has the funds.  Goods were supposed to be delivered  last week.  

 

On the day of delivery got a text to say not delivering for another two weeks.

 

 They are now requesting proof of identity, address, employment etc  which she sent to them.  Yesterday she got another email requesting the same information.

 

In response she told them by email to cancel the order and requested a full refund.  

 

Neither of us can understand why they require proof of identity, proof of address etc.  

 

Reading reviews of the company on Trustpilot 86% of reviewers rate the company as Bad.  It is a company called Appliance Direct.

 

As it is a "virtual"  South African CC I am not sure if S75 would apply.  

 

Sadly at the moment CRA 2015 cannot be used and I am unsure of Consumer Contract Regulations?  

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Appliance Direct - Non delivery of goods!

I doubt an sa cc is covered by our UK consumer credit act .

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used Appliances Direct for a number of white goods and a mobile phone and I have found them to be excellent.

 

When I had an issue with a tumble dryer they replaced it once with the same model and when that failed with the same fault they replaced it with a different make/model of higher value at their cost.

 

I recommend them highly, especially compared to Appliances On Line - are you sure it wasn't them you had trouble with?

Edited by Homer67
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought it was Appliance Direct, but it is Appliances Direct and they are two different stores.  Not sure how to edit the heading as the heading is now incorrect.

 

We have used Appliances Direct in the past with no issue so cannot understand why they want copies of passport etc when they already have the money even it was paid for by a SA CC? 

 

I thought money laundering rules only applied to transfers of over £10000?

 

Does the retailer have any right to ask for identification like copies of passport, proof of address etc? 

 

She does have a Nationwide current account with a debit card, but all the funds are in South Africa waiting to be transferred.

 

The credit card she is using is similar to the pre Pay CC that we have here in the UK as is valid anywhere in the world.

 

They transfer funds from SA account onto CC to buy goods however address for virtual or Online card is probably in SA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what daughter told us. 

 

Not sure why I put the name in the heading instead of in body of post.  My mistake. 

 

Perhaps remove name from heading altogether. 

 

Also need to modify paragraph on body of post as referring to the wrong company. 

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that company names on the internet can be very similar, it would be great if we could be sure which company we're complaining about in case they spot this thread. Especially in the light of what Homer said.

 

Is there an invoice you can show us a copy of please? Minus personal details of course.

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said I am querying on behalf of my daughter so I don't have access to her account or invoice as that is her personal issue. 

 

I should have been clearer and the actual question is whether a company can request proof of identity, address, employment etc before deciding to deliver?    Does not matter which company it is so name can be removed.

 

She has bought other stuff from other companies using the same method of payment as she is slowly furnishing their home so cannot understand why this company is giving her grief.  Surely if there was an issue, it should have been mentioned before the delivery date last week which never happened?

 

I suspect that they took the orders for the appliances and then realised that there is a 3 week wait before they can obtain the goods so are now playing it out and were hoping that she would not cancel.  However she has emailed to cancel and is waiting for return of funds.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

i suspect its down to using the SA CC, and yes they can ask for verification but i'd simply use say her ctax bill?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Appliance Direct(s)? - Non delivery of goods! now asking for ID proof

they simply wish to verify who and where she is thats all.

i doubt many docs are in her name at the new residence then?

 

just type no need to keep hitting quote.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...