Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

kensington mortgage


colin1096
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 797 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bit of a silly question but here goes .

 

i have 8 years to run on my mortgage and rung the mortgage company to reduce it to 4 years .

They said they would have to do credit checks and affordability checks on me and my wife but i know our credit history is shocking .

 

Now my question is  ( if they say no )

i have say a direct debit per month for £ 350  and online there is a facility to make a payment .

Could i just keep the DD and make a payment Of £ 350 per month as well online for 4 years would i be any better or worse off.

 

I know in theory this sounds simple but just wondered if it would have any affect .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you are on a fixed term mortgage which takes you for the rest of the eight years, then there is absolutely no way that they can prevent you paying it off early. All you gotta do is start making enhanced payments.

Who's the mortgage company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's not really my area of experience but I don't see how they can prevent you repaying early unless there is some penalty involved

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you , the only other thing is , there is also  (Your Total Overdue balance is £376.03. This includes your Payment Arrears balance of £0.00 and Other Amounts Due balance of £376.03 )

 

i have queried this and they think it is some late penalty fees or charges from when i was ge money over 12 years ago which i knew nothing about until i have checked my account online this week .

 

They are going to send me statements because they said they can only look back 6 years and i haven't missed a payment with kensington at all in 12 years .

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well first of all if there were late penalty fees then they have probably been charged and unlawful rate. Also, if these late penalty fees are not added to the mortgage – which they should not be then they become statute barred after six years. If they were attached the mortgage then they would have been statute barred after 12 years.

However, I suppose that Kensington will want all of it back. The easy thing for you to do would be to pay it all back and then claim back the unlawful fees.

If you get into a fight on the basis that you simply refuse to pay the unlawful fees, then you could find it difficult to pay and to get your mortgage discharged. Best to get a discharge first and then go back and attack them when they have no further hold over you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would need to check. I know on my mortgage the most I can overpay each year is 10%. I am on a fixed rate however.

I believe most companies have that.
Also check that you don’t have an early settlement. It cost me £3k to close a mortgage down 3 months before the end. But it was that or not selling...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to kensington and capital repayment - can i Reduce mortgage term by paying more Early?

kensington make up their own rules as they go along and always to their benefit.

i bet they are still charging you for the arrears from the time you were with GE.

 

send them an sar. get reclaiming. just wait for them to say oh no too late.

they've been fined by all their regulators SOO many times now they just don't care.

 

there is nothing to stop you making additional lump sum payments.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

We have a mortgage with GE money which was taken over by kensington Mortgage company in 2016 .

 

Back around 2011 we were struggling some months and would always ring ge money before our direct debit was due and ask if we could pay double the following month . I was self employed so money was up and down. We always paid what we arranged and this sort of continued for about 12 months .

 

Charges were put on my account of £40 some times because of this but they said they would go . Some did and some didnt . Recently about 5 months ago i wanted to reduce my mortgage term but kensington said that the arrears of £376 had to be paid first . I was unaware of these charges even there and i rarely checked my statements .

 

They said it was nothing to do with them , i had to go back to GE money who inturn said it is now kensingtons problem. I went the FOS and below is there response.

 

Dear XXX XXXXXX

 

Mr X XXXXXX and Mrs X XXXXXX complaint about Kensington Mortgage Company Limited

 

I’ve now looked at the information we have about this complaint. Although we deal with a wide range of complaints, there are times when we can’t help. Unfortunately, based on what I’ve seen so far, I don’t think your complaint is one we can look into.

 

Complaint

 

You’re unhappy with the amount of arrears that have accrued on your mortgage balance

 

Background

 

You told us back in 2011 you were struggling financially and asked the mortgage company to change the date of your direct debit, as you were incurring unpaid charges between £25 and £40 a time. You said sometime these charges were refunded and on other occasions they weren’t even through the business said they would refund them. You said you paid off £176.06 of outstanding charges on 7 June 2012, however there was still a balance left that was accruing further interest. You said the balance kept increasing until 30 April 2016 when interest was stopped leaving a balance of £376.03 owed.

 

As a resolution you would like these charges removed so there are no arrears showing on your mortgage, which will enable you to extend the term of your mortgage.

 

Kensington Mortgage Company said the arrears balance of £376.03 relates to historic fees and interest incurred on the total outstanding balance when your mortgage was with GE Money and were charged in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the mortgage. Their records indicate that when your account was with GE Money, statements were sent out to you on a regular basis which detailed the fees applied and notice of fee letters were also issued.

 

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Dispute Resolution Rules (DISP) sets time limits as being six years from the event giving rise to the complaint or, three years from when you knew (or ought reasonably to have known) that you had cause for complaint. They didn’t uphold your complaint as the fees were charged over 6 years ago, however they reviewed the account going back to July 2014 to date and identified that you have not been charged any fees during this period.

 

Findings

 

Kensington Mortgage Company has only consented for us to investigate issues within 6 years of the final response letter 23 September 2021, which means I can only consider what happened on your account from 23 September 2015 onwards.

 

When we review cases like this we are obliged to operate within certain rules - known as the DISP rules - and these set out, among other things, what an eligible complaint is and whether it has been referred to us in time to be considered.

 

One of the DISP rules (specifically DISP 2.8.2) states that we cannot consider a complaint if it was made more than:

 

·        Six years after the event complained of; or if later

·        Three years from when the customer was aware, or ought reasonably to have been aware, of cause for complaint.

 

Kensington Mortgage Company said as the events in your complaint date back to  2011 and 2012, these points are all time barred as you were aware of them at the time. Furthermore, you received statements detailing the applicable charge(s). Therefore, this would fall outside of our jurisdiction as you had an awareness back in 2012 that you had cause to complain, but didn’t bring the complaint to our service until March 2021.

 

I appreciate you have said that you had no awareness of the fees and charges until Kensington sent you a statement, however I could see a letter was sent to you on 6 May 2016, from GE advising of the fees and interest charges of £376.03 (attached), therefore you could’ve raised a complaint then.

 

Unfortunately based on the information I’ve reviewed, your complaint about the charges applied to your account prior to September 2015 falls outside of our jurisdiction because its time barred. So, I can only review what’s happened on your account from September 2015 onwards, however, if there are any exceptional circumstances I need to be aware of, as to why you didn’t bring this complaint to us sooner, then I would be happy to review it again.

 

Next steps

If you decide that you don't accept what I’ve said, then please let me know by 11 March 2022. If I can’t resolve things then an ombudsman here can look at everything again and make a decision. If I don’t hear from you by that date we might not be able to look at your complaint again.

i Just wondered if it was worth getting back in touch with the FOS or just pay up .

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged.

 

is there anything exceptional thats changed in your situation as they ask...

 

as i said before kennys/ge are a very hard nut to now crack

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife's father drowned whilst he was on holiday in 2012 . My father passed away suddenly in 2013 . We suffered financial hard ship in 2012 to 2015 , but did manage to keep up mortgage payments . I had a heart attack in 2021 . We both had covid and both isolated for 6 months in 2021 . I developed diabetes last year . Among other things we still struggle about.  Also with being self employed money is always tight. 

 

Edited by colin1096
Mispell
Link to post
Share on other sites

Give it a go.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...