Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Boris Johnson, former Prime Minister


Recommended Posts

I don't think the Sunaks are going to have a good weekend, are they?

 

After the tax trusts there"s also the question of what the IRS are going to pick up on and want to talk to them about because of them having green cards until pretty recently. A friend worked for an American owned multinational and says the IRS were really tough about pursuing tax they thought was due, even with people who went back to Europe.

 

I really can't understand how it's OK to be chancellor and hold a US green card for 16 months during that time while promising to live in the US forever and pay tax on your worldwide income.

  • I agree 2

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He'll likely still be moving there once he fails to get PM job

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

back to energy

So why isn't the gov making it very very beneficial to have solar panels put on every suitable roof?

- perhaps a system where its installed for free, the freeholder owns it - the first 5 years electricity goes into the grid and the gov (taxpayer) gets the credit to pay back the installation costs  .. from then on it reduces the properties bills ..

 

the sort of capital investment that pays - rather than just short term profit to pals for nowt

 

(thats a summary as we know most people dont read more than a few lines)

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

but even more than addressing energy needs, this needs to be addressed

 

"Thousands of people have signed a petition demanding accountability for politicians who do not tell the truth in parliament."

 

"“It is ridiculous that you have a system where the speaker can throw an MP out of the House of Commons for accusing somebody of lying, but an MP who is lying cannot be sanctioned in any way”

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Investigation by The Independent reveals that at least 27 false statements by ministers have not been corrected

 

 

ACTIONS.FULLFACT.ORG

As our elected representatives, MPs owe us the truth. And yet, we have a political system that operates as if honesty doesn’t matter.

 

 

Full Fact said that failing to correct the record on repeated false claims in parliament meant Mr Johnson “is in breach of the rules of the House of Commons and the ministerial code”.

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2
  • I agree 1

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ongoing Brexit 'benefits ... (Partly = 'only' 95%)

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Glitch in post-Brexit customs system adding to traffic chaos

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tobyjugg2 said:

back to energy

So why isn't the gov making it very very beneficial to have solar panels put on every suitable roof?

- perhaps a system where its installed for free, the freeholder owns it - the first 5 years electricity goes into the grid and the gov (taxpayer) gets the credit to pay back the installation costs  .. from then on it reduces the properties bills ..

 

the sort of capital investment that pays - rather than just short term profit to pals for nowt

 

(thats a summary as we know most people dont read more than a few lines)

 

no comments?

Ok - how about the main profiteering energy companies are made to pay for (and quality assure) the solar installations in lieu of a windfall tax, for which they get the half the electricity generated for the next 5 years (or they credit the bill with 50% of the households unit cost for whats generated - they are getting the installation sites rent free) while they manage a transition to greener local energy .... then its the leaseholders

- they will get smart meters rolled out as part of it too - likely to require them

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear in mind TJ that unless you have a battery back up charged from the panels and a trip to cut the link to main and allow the battery to then power the house via a suitable inverter in event of power cut, the power goes off in an outage even if panels generating.  Thats what an installer told me.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, tobyjugg2 said:

 

 

Breaking News .. Corrected

 

Shes gonna pay UK tax voluntarily

 

LOL - shame they haven't addressed the real issues so promptly

- I didn't think her not paying tax was a real issue .. She isn't a brit.

 

- get our Chancellor and Russian oligarchs paying - now that would be a story

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brassnecked said:

Bear in mind TJ that unless you have a battery back up charged from the panels and a trip to cut the link to main and allow the battery to then power the house via a suitable inverter in event of power cut, the power goes off in an outage even if panels generating.  Thats what an installer told me.

 

Too True HB - which is why the mention of smart meters (meaning smart management/control system)

- but trying to keep it quite simple. Batteries could add quite significantly to the implementation costs but possible no reason why it shouldn'y be available as an option

 

Put Martin Lewis in overall management oversight with veto and no none disclosure so the populists dont just use it as another rip-off

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, Sunak really has lost the plot politically hasn't he (not that he was politically asute IMO)

 

Hes apparently ordered an investigation into the 'leak' by a 'labour supporter'

 

1, Why was it a 'secret' to be 'leaked', apart from all his denials?

2. Since when has Johnson been a labour supporter?

3. Shame he doesn't investigate tax dodgers as promptly or forcefully as he orders an investigation into 'leaks' about his own families UK tax dodging eh?

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Chancellor’s team believe Labour supporter in Downing Street may be behind damaging leak about Akshata Murty

 

 

WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM

“We need urgent answers from the chancellor as to why he has been linked to a tax haven", Labour's Pat McFadden said.

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know the news outlets are selling her as a possible .. but is that realistic, or are the news outlets reporting that .. creating it HB?

 

I know we ended up with Johnson, but Macron is no Corbuncle.

 

 

...

I find it interesting that Sunak has apparently had removals in moving loads of their stuff out of downing street

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you wonder what Sunak's up to and the timing is interesting. A lot of people think he's blown his chance of being PM, so could he consider going back to the US?

 

That Marion lady is a serious journo and I'd say it's certainly a possiblity that Le Pen could win enough votes, although I haven't seen any polls saying what people might do in the second round. It's important for Macron to step up now and persuade people he's worth voting for in two weeks' time - and not just to keep Le Pen out.

 

Some of the losing candidates have advised their followers to vote for Macron and the left wing man Melenchon said not to vote for Le Pen. He didn't seem able to bring himself to say to vote for Macron though and abstentions may not help. Most of the other candidates seem to think Le Pen is a bad choice, apart from Zemmour of course, who got 7% of the vote and made a 'victory' speech. He's recommended his followers to vote for her.

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, honeybee13 said:

Yes, you wonder what Sunak's up to and the timing is interesting. A lot of people think he's blown his chance of being PM, so could he consider going back to the US?

 

Sunak to US: You know that green card I put on hold ....

.. and referred himself to "Boris Johnson’s independent adviser on ministerial interests"

... Now that its ministerial interests' rather than 'standards' theres only the independent bit which clashes with the reality of the English used.

Surely that should be:    Boris Johnsons'  'independent' adviser on ministerial interests.

 

So who was the 'source' of the leak?

1. Johnson? 10-1

2. Truss?  8-1

3. Johnson + Truss? 8-1

4 A labour supporter 1-40

 

 

14 minutes ago, honeybee13 said:

 

That Marion lady is a serious journo and I'd say it's certainly a possiblity that Le Pen could win enough votes, although I haven't seen any polls saying what people might do in the second round. It's important for Macron to step up now and persuade people he's worth voting for in two weeks' time - and not just to keep Le Pen out.

 

Some of the losing candidates have advised their followers to vote for Macron and the left wing man Melenchon said not to vote for Le Pen. He didn't seem able to bring himself to say to vote for Macron though and abstentions may not help. Most of the other candidates seem to think Le Pen is a bad choice, apart from Zemmour of course, who got 7% of the vote and made a 'victory' speech. He's recommended his followers to vote for her.

 

 

Hopefully its just like Farage in the UK..

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had to be investigated as a minister, I'd probably want Lord Geidt as well.

 

I wonder what the leak inquiry will find. Reading yesterday's comments, a lot of them aren't ruling out that Johnson or no10 were involved and the timing was very political.

 

It's worrying that they're saying it's a criminal offence to reveal someone's tax status, although someone did say they thought that might only apply to HMRC employees.

 

Personally I think that kind of thing should be in the public domain for anyone becoming an MP because of the potential conflicts of interest. I see Javid has said he was a non-dom as well now, although Jolyon Maugham thinks he may have underplayed the length of time it lasted.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The leak inquiry will find no fault, that's preordained whether there is fault or not

 

That the inquiry will not look at the simple facts that these tax havens shouldn't exist as a mechanism for 'not un-legal' tax evasion is the real issue.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Met is dragging it out as much as possible despite Cover-up Cress gone.

 

Shows that the met issues are far deeper than just c-u-Cress

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about repeat offenses? Johnson (allegedly) has a handful or more event attendances doen't he?

Mind you he'll blame anyone else .. including nut nut and the dog was the organizer ...

 

Didn't think fixed penalties included a '12 other offenses whitewashed with the one'

err 'other offenses taken into consideration'

and I thought the fines/penalties rose exponentially when repeated?

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

So lets see

* Unlawfully prorogued parliament

* Repeated false statements in parliament - aka lying - confirmed as lying as uncorrected (x a couple of dozen at least)

* At least a couple of financial fiddles/inappropriate holiday gratuities etc

- some corrected after being caught (its OK Judge, I'll give the car back i stole - alls good - jog on and bye bye)

* Breaching his own lockdown rules

 

I'm sure I've missed dozens and dozens

 

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Scotland Yard said more than 50 fines will be issued as part of its inquiry into lockdown breaking in Downing Street and Whitehall.

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tobyjugg2 said:

what about repeat offenses? Johnson (allegedly) has a handful or more event attendances doen't he?

Mind you he'll blame anyone else .. including nut nut and the dog was the organizer ...

 

Didn't think fixed penalties included a '12 other offenses whitewashed with the one'

err 'other offenses taken into consideration'

and I thought the fines/penalties rose exponentially when repeated?

 

Nobody's letting on the number of people being fined compared with the number of fines being issued. 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Large gatherings of more than fifteen people

£800 (reduced to £400 if paid within 14 days)

Doubles with each subsequent offence

 

 

£6,400 (for the fifth and subsequent offences)

 

 

 

Illegal raves and large gatherings of more than thirty people

£10,000

£10,000

£10,000

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact, given the egregious nature of these apparently repeated/ongoing offenses at the time, why are they getting fixed penalties rather than criminal charges?

 

Image if lucy donner poppy smith on the estate had thrown 100 person parties and held regular drinks every friday at her semi garden?

Ordinary people at the time were being threatened for simply talking to neighbors over a fence

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if sunak has reinstated his green card and booked a flight yet?

 

Forcing a by-election in a safe Tory seat is possibly all hes got left to repay Johnson for the 'leaks'

... and of course, the Tories winning the safe seat would see Johnson claiming it shows support for himself.

 

Looks like the only alternative for sunak is under Johnsons thrall.

Edited by tobyjugg2
  • Like 1

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...