Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thread title updated. so a sold debt. who are the solicitors? TM legal? why didn't ovo do this themselves as they do but chose to sell the debt on for 10p=£1? funny debt you state you reived a letter of claim, why did you not reply too it.? also is there is no indication of the date this bill comes from on the claimform? how do you know its from 2022? what other previous paperwork have you received? please scan page 1 of the claimform and bothsides of ALL previous letters upto one mass pdf read upload carefully. .................. pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Thank you again. I'm hoping it will come out in the wash and will endeavour to check my online account. I'm a bit unsettled by not hearing from Booking.com but the host is sounding helpful at the moment. HB
    • I've just remembered that a friend of mine had bookings cancelled on Booking.com about a month ago - and the good news is that all worked out in the wash. I'm at work now but will scribble properly in a couple of hours with the full tale.
    • Thank you Dave. I've had nothing from Booking.com, just a message via the site from the host. I know I need to check my bank account, just trying to resolve some technical issues. HB  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 22 May 2024  Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1. The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. 2. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. 3. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300 and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984. What is the total value of the claim? £385 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier What was the date of your last payment? Never  Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Non delivered items dispute - Merchant threatening me


kodiplod
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased various items from two different stores. I had issues with both stores in where items where tracked and shown as delivered to my address but unfortunately have not been. I have had a few issues like these in the past due to me living in a ground floor flat in the city centre with various unlocked entry points to the communal area. 

 

As both stores have refused to refund me, I opened a dispute with my bank. Since then, the merchants are now clubbing up against me stating they have built a case against me and will be contacting relevant authorities and solicitors if I do not withdraw the dispute from my bank.

 

Where do I stand here and should my course of action be? I genuinely have not received these items but obviously do not want to get in trouble with the police!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please will you give us the name of these retailers on the open forum. It's very important and doesn't put you any disadvantage.

Also, you should disregard these threats. They are meaningless and these people do not have this kind of power.

 do you have copies of these of these threats in writing and if so please would you post them up here.

we will only be able to help you if you are prepared to trust us and follow our advice

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also don't understand how these merchants would be clubbing together which potentially would be in breach of data protection rules

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from one company after I made the dispute: Auto Oid is the company.

 

We’ve been made aware from a number of companies about your fraudulent activities and have built a case against you. 

We have it in writing from Royal Mail that the item was successfully delivered to your address via GPS tracking and have evidence that you have contacted us via a different email address confirming you have received the item. 

I suggest you retract your chargeback with immediate effect or you should be getting a call from our solicitors and the police. 

This will be my final warning.

 

This is from the second company: M L Performance

We've kept all the information on file relating to your case, including your Facebook profile, your business info linking your details to your Facebook profile, proof of delivery of both shipments, and should you decide to take this matter to the bank we will present all the evidence, and also seek legal action to recover any losses that occur as a result of this, as well as report this to the relevant authority.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then their target is surely the people that own flat in not employing the correct means of building security...??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are a lot of questions to ask you.

First of all – and observation – there is no particular evidence here of "clubbing together" other than the fact that it seems to be quite a coincidence that these companies which presumably are independent of each other are attacking you in the same way. Do you have any explanation for this?

Next, apparently one company has said that they have received an email from you confirming that you have received the item. What details about that please?

Also, what are these items? And what is the value? And I suppose that we have to ask have you got any record of this kind of thing happening in the past? The message you have received says that they are aware of a number of companies who have experienced loss deliveries.

I have tried searching for the first company Auto Oid and I can't find them. Presumably they have a website. Please could you provide a link to them.

Is this the website of the second company? https://www.mlperformance.co.uk/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They both are in the same industry and I just assumed they have been speaking with each other.

 

Bit of background in regards to MLP... 

I was in a forum on Facebook in where I put a picture up of my car (on the morning of expected delivery from ML Performance) and stated that I will be fitting the said parts to my car next week. ML Performance found this post and are using this as evidence that I have received the goods. However, this post was put up at approx 8am and I put it up because I was excited I would be receiving my delivery later that day and fitting the parts to my car. The delivery was supposed to be coming around 2pm however it never did.

 

He then posted my Facebook profile and said evidence within this group and called me a scammer and wanted to warn other people about me. The post has since been removed however I was removed from the Facebook group (owner of ML Performance is the group moderator).

 

That is correct. Autoid claim they have evidence of an email received from a different email address claiming to have received this lost parcel. For some reason they think that I have emailed them from a different email address saying I have received it - it's crazy!

 

The items are car parts. ML Performance was approx £500 and Autoid is approx £400. Yes, I have had some issues with deliveries in the past to my current address but also so have my neighbours. We have had a case before where something was supposedly delivered and left outside my flat door but we assume was stolen. A door literally next to my front door leads on to a busy main road and is unlocked.

 

Autoid is the company. autoid.co  https://autoid.co/

 

 

Yes that is the correct second website. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, two things I think you should do.

Firstly is sent both these companies an SAR. Do it today.

Secondly, in case they do contact the bank, I think that it is better that your bank has it from you first rather than from them.

Presumably you have a chargeback reference number so I think that you should alert the bank to the fact that the chargeback is being challenged and that if your bank has any questions then you are happy to receive them and to answer them.
Let your bank have this information in writing.

I'm not sure what else we can do for the moment until something happens. It will be interesting to see the SARs and to see whether they have been sharing your personal data which would put you in a very good position. Also, they would be obliged to disclose this email address and that might give you something to go with as well.

By and large it sounds to me as if the threats are a load of hot air – but you certainly want to protect yourself and so take the steps that I suggested above. Let us know if there are any developments

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a couple of further thoughts along with BankFodder's, whose advice you should follow.

 

If they do in fact have GPS data, then that data will only be accurate enough to place the delivery driver near, or at best, in your building. It will not be accurate enough to place him definitively at your door and certainly doesn't prove you received the parcel, even if it was pinpoint accurate. Moreover, any GPS trackable services I've ever used tracked the van, not the package itself, which would further dilute its usefulness.

 

Secondly, if their claim is that your package was delivered, Royal Mail will have a signature from the recipient, which won't be you, right? Unless you gave the delivery company express permission to deliver to someone other than you, then won't liability for the lack of delivery rest with the Royal Mail through their failure to deliver to the correct recipient? To obtain the signature data, can the OP SAR Royal Mail themselves to get it, or on the basis that the company was the Royal Mail's client in this case, would that data only be available to them?

 

OP, I take it you have knocked on a few doors just to double check nobody else took this in for you and just hasn't bothered to contact you?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all correct.

 

No signatures are currently being given due to the pandemic, so it is solely relied on GPS or a picture of the parcel.

 

I have knocked on approx 5 doors and all with no luck. It’s really alarming to see that Autoid have received an email from someone claiming to have received my parcel. Absolutely madness that they think it’s me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...