Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive. Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.
    • First of all it sounds as if your retailer is very decent and very responsible. This itself is unusual in these kinds of circumstances and I think we need to bear this in mind. The guarantee is not particularly relevant and in fact the dealer had a statutory duty to exercise a certain responsibility for your computer – probably for several years as their obligation under the consumer rights act. The dealer may not have known this and it simply acting out of a sense of moral responsibility and that is even more noteworthy. You've already suggested earlier that you didn't really want to cause problems for your retailer. I think that you will need the help of your retailer as well in order to get information and evidence. I suggest that you proceed against DPD – but before you do that – I suggest that you have a discussion with the retailer. Tell them that this is what you are going to be doing and you would like to have a copy of anything they have which relates to the special instructions which apparently your dealer has already informed you about in relation to where item should be left. Secondly, maybe you should tell your dealer about this site and also about this thread. I can imagine like many dealers who are frequently sending items by means of couriers, they have had things go missing. Tell them that we will be very happy to help them recover money for lost or damaged or stolen items – and that is regardless of whether or not they have purchased insurance. Apart from being very pleased to help your dealer recover items which have been lost by irresponsible parcel delivery companies, I think we need to encourage the complicity between you and them so they will be pleased to support you in your claim against DPD. It will be helpful if you can get a copy of the instructions that you have referred to above, and also if you can get some written evidence of your own instruction that your laptop should be left in a safe place. Have you done the reading on this sub- forum? You will need to do lots of reading of many of the similar stories on this sub- forum. They won't necessarily be against DPD but the principles will broadly be the same. Also read the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum in order to understand many of the principles involved. Getting your money back but be quick – but your chances of success are better than 90% that you can bank on it taking anything up to a year. Have you got anything in writing from DPD either refusing you or telling you that they won't discuss with you?  
    • Thank you for telling us the text of the letter you had from the police. As we don't seem to have come across this before, it would be really useful for us to see the original please. HB
    • Pasco has recalled 104,000 packs of sliced bread after rat remains were found in at least two packs.View the full article
    • UPDATE I went rooting through an old box of paperwork I have and I've found the original Default Notice. It is dated **/**/201*, however.. The copy of the Default Notice that they sent with the LBC has a completely different date on it 😮 Can they issue 2 default notices for the same debt? Where they have changed the date on the copy, they have also changed the amount owed through failed payments and how much is required to be paid by a certain date. In addition, they sent (with the 1st LBC) a copy of the termination of the agreement, which I cannot find the original. However, the termination date is 3 days after the date given on the (doctored) Default Notice, by which monies are to be paid by. So, they gave until the 'x' date to pay the arrears, then terminated the agreement 3 days later. I bet a dollar to a dime they've doctored the termination date also.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Onliine Claim Help


Isiris
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just looking and hoping someone could dot the "i"s and cross the "T"s for me on something

I raised a claim against someone for £9k

They have been in touch via their solicitor with the usual we don't admit liability etc etc but will settle for the amount. I agreed and they said they would send over a Settlement Agreement

Now they have BUT they want me to file a notice of discontinuance BEFORE they pay me PLUS they want a confidentiality agreement. I have said I want payment before I file the NOD but I have also said if you want confidentiality then there will be a £1500 premium for this as if this went to the local press, it would affect them massively. That wasn't my intention by the way but we move in similar circles so I don't want to be under the threat of litigation without some reward

Just to add, I can also file for summary judgment as they are way past acknowledge ment and was unsure as to whether to do this to strengthen my position but didn't want to look harsh if it did go to court and they claimed I did this out of spite while negotiating. 

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but you've given us scant detail – and you have been here long enough to know that we need to understand the story thoroughly in order to give you the best advice.

This means that you need to give us a bullet pointed chronology so that we can understand dates, sums, who the parties are and what the issues are – at least that.

As you put a claim in, you should put up the claim form in PDF format – and presumably they have filed a defence and you should post that up as well in PDF format – redacted for identifiers.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why not do a consent order?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening BF

As of yet they haven't filed a defence as commented that they haven't even acknowledged the claim

In regards the claim, as I have made an offer of a fee for confidentiality, can I share it in advance?

  • Thanks 1

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

why not do a consent order?

 

dx

 

I was thinking a Tomlin order – but certainly although we haven't heard anything about the story yet, if they have passed the date for a default judgement I would be putting in for a judgement. I'm not aware that one is prevented from putting in for a judgement if there is some kind of negotiation going on.

However we need to know the story

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't read the draft agreement – it's too involved but I get the gist from the claim form. Thank you

 

I would suggest that you tell them that you want this agreement rendered into a Tomlin order.



It seems to me that on that basis you are both protected.

 

I suggest that you write to them tomorrow or phone them and say to them that if the agreement is rendered into a Tomlin order then you are good to go.

I'm a bit concerned because according to the claim you are claiming over £10,000 and the interest and that takes you into the fast track

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, my balance was just over £10k so to keep it in small claims i claimed for £9000 and said I would keep the other £1000 in my account for when it was reopened. I knew that they would close the account anyway

What are your thoughts on the confidentiality element?

 

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as I say, I haven't read anything about the agreement particularly.

Have they agreed to what you're asking in return for confidentiality? And also is there a risk that if you insist on selling them confidentiality that it could prejudice the entire agreement?

Let me say, that in principle I totally agree that people should not give away confidentiality for nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no defence. The balance is on the account as stated. The issue revolves around Source Of Funds. You will have to trust me on this part but I work in gaming in a Senior Roll of a larger competitor. They do not need source of funds as I am winning £15k from them. I refused to send them a copy of my contract which they asked for to support my spending. This isnt applicable as my first deposit was £100 and I am infront with them ever since. 

If they did defend, I would apply for a summary judgement as like I said, there is no defence. 

 

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say there is no defence – but they may decide to put something up.

You say also that you will apply for summary judgement – but at this level it will be quite difficult and quite time-consuming. I suppose you're not confusing summary judgement with default judgement?

Anyway, it looks as if they want to settle and I would suggest that in order to secure your position you have it rendered into a Tomlin order.

Put it to them. As they are using a solicitor, tell them to draft the Tomlin order so you can have a look at it and coming and suggest any amendments.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't request SJ as the defendant has not AOS or Submitted a defence....yet....and then you would require the courts permission to make such application in the absence of a defence....you request a default judgment once the period has expired (19 days from issuance date) 

 

I wouldn't have reduced the claim to fit the track as claims slightly over the threshold can still be allocated to SCT if both parties agree.....the £1000 residue complicates your position.

 

Im not sure why a consent order is required if they are happy to settle...simply admit and pay.....end of claim.

 

Andy

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...