Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Your parking ticket may be unlawful


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HERE'S ANOTHER TWIST TO A FAMILIAR TOPIC.

I received a liability for payment notice from a private company operating CCTV cameras in a private car park. No PCN was issued on the day. The CCTV shows me entering and leaving, allegedly in contravention of time allowed.

The Private Company obtained my Vehicle Registration details from DVLA on payment of £2.50. Their notices state they operate in accordance with DVLA Code of Practice for private car park enforcement. That same Code of Practice at point 3.2 states:

“Notices giving full details of the parking contravention and the proposed course of action to be taken by the enforcer should be placed in a prominent position on the ‘offending’ vehicle without causing it damage. Vehicle keepers should be made aware that their name and address will be requested from the DVLA”.

The company, Athena ANPR Ltd yesterday sent me a "Notice of County Court Claim." This is no more than a threatening red letter but enclosed was an N1 form (available from the County Court website) which seems to infer that a claim has been submitted to the Court. The claim form is not signed, has not been stamped by the Court and in fact no name of any court appears on the form. They are demanding £170-00 inclusive of court costs (which have not even been incurred.) This, of course, is a very severe abuse. Is there any legislation anyone is aware of covering these specific circumstances?

Fletch

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 955
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thats nasty. Perhaps the Harrassment Act.

 

You could phone your local county court and explain the situation amd as them what can be done.

 

As they have threatened Court you could serve them with whats known as a "Calderbank Offer". Your letter is marked "without prejudice save as to costs". You could write to the company and offer to settle the dispute on the basis that they drop the case against you within 14 days. The offer will also advise them that after 14 days your offer will remain open but only on the basis that they agree to pay your costs to be taxed if not agreed).

 

If you like that idea I can draft a letter for you.

 

It might get them worried!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HERE'S ANOTHER TWIST TO A FAMILIAR TOPIC.

I received a liability for payment notice from a private company operating CCTV cameras in a private car park. No PCN was issued on the day. The CCTV shows me entering and leaving, allegedly in contravention of time allowed.

The Private Company obtained my Vehicle Registration details from DVLA on payment of £2.50. Their notices state they operate in accordance with DVLA Code of Practice for private car park enforcement. That same Code of Practice at point 3.2 states:

“Notices giving full details of the parking contravention and the proposed course of action to be taken by the enforcer should be placed in a prominent position on the ‘offending’ vehicle without causing it damage. Vehicle keepers should be made aware that their name and address will be requested from the DVLA”.

The company, Athena ANPR Ltd yesterday sent me a "Notice of County Court Claim." This is no more than a threatening red letter but enclosed was an N1 form (available from the County Court website) which seems to infer that a claim has been submitted to the Court. The claim form is not signed, has not been stamped by the Court and in fact no name of any court appears on the form. They are demanding £170-00 inclusive of court costs (which have not even been incurred.) This, of course, is a very severe abuse. Is there any legislation anyone is aware of covering these specific circumstances?

 

Unless the form has a seal of the Court it remains a piece of paper.

 

Have a look here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/post-666494.html

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

This, of course, is a very severe abuse. Is there any legislation anyone is aware of covering these specific circumstances?

 

With regard to the non-incurred court fee: deception offences.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is surely just a debt collection matter because that is exactly what they are trying to do. If that is the case have a look at the OFT paper on debt collection, they specifically mention the issue of documents that purport to be issued by a court.

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

page 7

And also check if they hold a credit licence. I am not sure if they need to but it may be worth a chat with OFT and Trading Standards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, hope someone can help with this one, I had to take my pregnant girlfriend to her doctor this afternoon for an emergency appointment.

The doctors surgery is located in an area where the only parking available is a council carpark. The car park is accesed by a ticketed barrier system.

In front of the car park is a disabled parking area, with around 20 spaces.

I knew i hadn't grabbed my wallet leaving the house and had no money to pay for the car park, so parked in a bay reserved for blue badge holders.

20 minutes later we emerged (after being told to go straight to the hospital) to find a ticket on the car.

I have read the first few pages of this thread, and the ticket appears to be in order. I shall add the details below and would be grateful for any advice on how to get out of it if possible.

 

Road Traffic Act 1991(as amended)

penalty charge notice No: SL*******

 

Date of Notice :26/03/2007

Date of Contravention : 26/03/2007

 

Time contravention occured : 13:32

 

the vehicle with registration Number : **** ***

make : Ford Colour: Silver

 

was observed in : ****** Street (Disabled) car park East Kilbride

By Parking Attendant :52

 

Who had reasonable cause to believe that a penalty charge is payable with respect to the above mentioned vehicle on the grounds that the following parking contravention occured:

Parked in a disabled persons parking space without clearly displaying a valid disabled persons badge.

 

The penalty charge of £60 must be paid before the end of the 28 days beginning with date of the notice. The penalty charge will be reduced by 50%, to £30, if paid before the end of the period of 14 days beginning with the date of the notice.

 

Signature

 

See overleaf for payment details, Do not pay the parking attendant, All payment must be made in Sterling.

Then there is the payment slip below which i know is not part of the PCN

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I think on the face of it you will have to throw yourself on the mercy of the council. Get a letter from the doctor & if possible the hospital & ask the council under the circumstances to waive the charge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

wondering if you could help with this, im confused on the code!

ive been down and filmed the road, as i was bored while picking up my girlfriend, i was droping her off at the time the ticket was issued and we took her stuff to her flat came back ten minutes later and i had a ticket.

 

Ticket is:

03-29-2007115824PM.jpg

03-29-2007115945PM.jpg

 

and the video of the street it was issued on is here:

 

 

thanks in advance martin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest xipetotec46
TW's can stop a vehicle & they can also demand ID. Parking Attendants cannot

 

TW's cannot stop a vehicle they are Traffic Wardens not policemen only a policeman/woman has the authority to stop a vehicle this is why they use to Police to stop you to ask if you wish to take part in a survey, or have your car checked for red diesel by customs who cannot stop a vehicle either.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest xipetotec46

i was droping her off at the time the ticket was issued and we took her stuff to her flat came back ten minutes later and i had a ticket.

 

Issued by a cop or a warden not much you can do unless you want to contest it in court, I would pay it and forget it.. if it was a PCN then it would be diff. also the code M1 is waiting in a restricted street, restricted from parking from.... to.... it is an offence to do it, send the video to the council tell them to make good the lines and tarmac and give it a clean while they are at it, it is disgraceful, I wouldn't park my 20 year old Skoda in that street.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TW's cannot stop a vehicle they are Traffic Wardens not policemen only a policeman/woman has the authority to stop a vehicle this is why they use to Police to stop you to ask if you wish to take part in a survey, or have your car checked for red diesel by customs who cannot stop a vehicle either.:)

 

TWs may stop a vehicle, as they also have a traffic control function if authorised by the Chief Officer of Police. A TW can be put on point duty!

 

They have no further power, they cannot demand ID, documents or search

Link to post
Share on other sites

Issued by a cop or a warden not much you can do unless you want to contest it in court, I would pay it and forget it.. if it was a PCN then it would be diff. also the code M1 is waiting in a restricted street, restricted from parking from.... to.... it is an offence to do it, send the video to the council tell them to make good the lines and tarmac and give it a clean while they are at it, it is disgraceful, I wouldn't park my 20 year old Skoda in that street.

 

Au contraire mon ami...

 

If the lines and signs are in any way defective, then take the option of contesting in Court. Once summonsed, plead not guilty and quote the case of Davis v Heatley to them - which is binding on the Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is surely just a debt collection matter because that is exactly what they are trying to do. If that is the case have a look at the OFT paper on debt collection, they specifically mention the issue of documents that purport to be issued by a court.

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

page 7

And also check if they hold a credit licence. I am not sure if they need to but it may be worth a chat with OFT and Trading Standards

How do i find out if they've got a credit license?

Fletch

Link to post
Share on other sites

TW's can only stop vehicles when engaged in the process of regulating traffic. There is no power to stop a vehicle to issue a ticket!

 

Obviously, as a moving vehicle cannot by definition be committing a parking offence:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Release of Information,

Fee Paying Enquiries Section,

DVLA,

Swansea

SA99 1AJ.

 

Dear Sir or Madam:

 

Re Athena ANPR Ltd, Private Parking Contractor.

 

I am the Keeper of a silver Renault Scenic XXX XXX. The vehicle is registered at the above address.

I have recently received notification of a parking charge in respect of an alleged parking contravention on private land in Croydon on 20/2/07. I understand the land in question is jointly owned by Lidl and Fitness First. I have been contacted by a company called Athena ANPR Ltd of PO Box 420, Hounslow, TW3 9EL who claim to be pursuing costs in respect of the alleged ‘contravention.’

 

I understand my vehicle registration details have been obtained by Athena from DVLA under Regulation 27 of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations 2002 which stipulates that persons/organisations requiring such details must demonstrate reasonable cause.’

 

The correspondence I have received from Athena states that they are “Operating in accordance with DVLA Code of Practice for private car enforcement.”

 

I do not have a copy of the DVLA Code of Practice and would be grateful if you could supply me with one. However, I am led to understand that point 3.2 of the code states:

“Notices giving full details of the parking contravention and the proposed course of action to be taken by the enforcer should be placed in a prominent position on the ‘offending’ vehicle without causing it damage. Vehicle keepers should be made aware that their name and address will be requested from the DVLA”.

 

 

On the date in question my vehicle was not issued with any form of parking ticket or notice. Athena has sought to rely on CCTV evidence to prove a parking contravention. They do not state if any legally enforceable off-road parking restrictions apply. The ‘contravention’ is in any case disputed.

Please can you inform me if Athena are acting within the terms agreed by the Code of Practice and whether they have supplied you with sufficient information to establish ‘reasonable cause.’ I realise that ‘reasonable cause’ is not defined in the Act but one would presume that this requires some positive demonstration of proof on the part of the person requesting the information, (Proof that they are acting on behalf of the landowner, an outline of facts, a declaration that the information will not be misused etc) and not just an automatic presumption on the part of DVLA that the information should be furnished on receipt of £2.50.

 

The company, Athena ANPR Ltd, yesterday sent me a "Notice of County Court Claim." This is no more than a threatening red letter but enclosed was an N1 form (Appendix 2- available from the County Court website) which seems to infer that a claim has been submitted to the Court. The claim form is not signed, has not been stamped by the Court and in fact no name of any court appears on the form. They are demanding £170-00 inclusive of court costs (which have not even been incurred.) This, of course, is a very severe abuse.

 

The Office Of Fair Trading: Debt Collection Guidance dated July 2003 (updated December 2006) states that the use of official looking documents intended or likely to mislead debtors as to their status, for example, documents made to resemble court claims is an unfair business practice

 

My submission to you is that Athena’s request cannot constitute ‘reasonable cause’: They have failed to demonstrate that any regulations are in force, that they are acting on behalf of the landowner, that they have operated in accordance with DVLA Code of Practice for private car enforcement by placing a notice on the vehicle. They have not, it seems, issued such a claim notification in respect of any trespass. You will be aware that any claim for trespass can only be made against the driver and not the keeper of the vehicle? They have followed bullying letters with a grossly misleading quasi-judicial N1 claim-form document which is designed to ‘con’ the individual into thinking a claim has already been put before the court. I am appalled that DVLA policies allow this cowboy company to access highly sensitive and personal data.

 

I understand that The Agency may carry out audits of the enquirer's internal control systems - so far as they relate to DVLA enquiries - to ensure that they comply with best practice. As my Parking Charge Notice is numbered 0 000 030 524 I am to assume that 30, 524 previous notices have been issued in similar circumstances to other keepers of vehicles. If keepers’ details have been sought in every case this represents £ 75,135 additional revenue to the Agency. If every keeper has paid the initial fine of £45 this represents a total of £1,373, 580 which may have been obtained for Athena under such circumstances.

 

Could you please furnish me with the following under Data Protection and Freedom of Information Act legislation :-

A copy of the V888/3 submitted in respect of my vehicle.

A copy of any written authority supplied to DVLA in respect of actions taken on behalf of Lidl and Fitness First.

The number of V888/3’s submitted by Athena in 2006/7.

The number of V888/3’s authorised.

The value of V888 forms in 2006/7 to DVLA.

 

 

Sincerely,

Fletch1962

Fletch

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...