Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

US elections November 2024 [amended 18/04/24 - HB]


Recommended Posts

as

 

Trump news – live: Ex-president pleads fifth amendment 440 times as Trumpworld hunts Mar-a-Lago raid informant

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

‘Violence against law enforcement is not the answer, no matter who you’re upset with,’ says Christopher Wray

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, heres another the of the Trump'et team thats about to be thrown to the dogs eh?

Hope he's ready for the death threats from the trump nuts.

 

"a lawyer for the ex-president also told the Department of Justice (DOJ) in June that all classified material at Mar-a-Lago had been returned."

 
"At least one member of Mr Trump’s legal team signed a written statement earlier this summer stating that all of the materials marked as classified which were stored in boxes at Mr Trump’s private Florida club and home had been handed over to the government"
 
WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Rolling coverage of the latest developments following the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago
.. Trump says - its all that traitors fault.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps more that they don't expect to be paid, but for nobodies (prepared to lie) its good advertising

 

Bad news is a Trumpet beat cheney for the grop Wyoming seat

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a shame about Wyoming.

 

If I were a lawyer, as you say I'd be worried about not being paid. I think Trump has form for this, especially if the result goes against him. Did he have a run in with Giuliani? I can't remember exactly.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tobyjugg2 said:

Perhaps more that they don't expect to be paid, but for nobodies (prepared to lie) its good advertising

 

Bad news is a Trumpet beat cheney for the grop Wyoming seat

And of course Ms Palin is making a comeback supported by Donald

A run for VP with Trump?

Now there’s a thought 🤣

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

That's a shame about Wyoming.

 

If I were a lawyer, as you say I'd be worried about not being paid. I think Trump has form for this, especially if the result goes against him. Did he have a run in with Giuliani? I can't remember exactly.

 

Yep

Who is now attending his call to appear before a grand jury

- after claiming he couldn't fly to attend after surfery

- -  and caught with flights booked elsewhere

 

 

Plus

"Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, has speculated that his ex-boss may have kept secret documents at Mar-a-Lago to use as a bargaining chip if and when he is arrested for alleged felonies.

“I believe the sensitive information was going to be used by him as a get out of jail free card,” Mr Cohen said.

 

“The second they would put him in handcuffs, he would turn around and say I have the documentation showing, for example, where our nuclear launch pads are ... This is what I believe: He would use it and say, if you proceed with this, I’m telling you right now there’s 20 of my loyal supporters, you don’t know who they are, but we will release that information to Russia, to Iran, to whoever it might be. Because he doesn’t care about this country.”"

 

Oh

and Trump wants the warrant released as it will give the names of those who gave the information that the top secret docs were at Trumps place

- they should release it with the names and any identifying information redacted :-)

  • Like 1

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

haven't looked into the detail, but didn't all these sort of 'represent himself' headlines fly around at his potential impeachment as well?

 

Is it just headline grabbing to keep his pack of dogs howling?

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard to know the motivation when it's Trump. But it's possible that lawyers don't want to put their names to something that isn't, err, entirely truthful.

 

There's also the concern that the orange one has a history of not paying bills, including lawyers.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he has a few problems. 92 documents labelled Secret and 25 Top Secret held not all that securely at Mar a Lago.

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

According to the affidavit, the government previously found in Trump’s possession 184 documents marked ‘classified’, 67 marked ‘confidential’, 92...

 

 

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, and Trump is claiming he issues some sort of standing order that everything he took away from the white house was automatically declassified

.. which should be interesting given his claims that much stuff requested from him ... was classified ..

 

WWW.FACTCHECK.ORG

After the FBI seized boxes of U.S. documents from Mar-a-Lago — some of them labeled “top secret” — former President Donald Trump claimed he...

 

 

 

well - apart from if you are:

"a woman, claiming to be an heiress from a famous European banking dynasty, visited the seaside golf resort on numerous occasions, mingling with guests including Mr Trump.

The woman, however, was not a wealthy heiress, but instead a Ukrainian born daughter of a truck driver in Illinois, and with an alleged shady background connecting her to charity scams and organised crime."

that is

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

The woman, allegedly under a false identity, managed to access the Florida estate where former President Donald Trump was storing sensitive US...

 

  • Sad 1

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sums up why documents at Mar a Lago was a bad idea.

 

I've never thought he could just declassify a document on a whim and I'm sure I read earlier on that there was a process within the White House to do this. He didn't follow it.

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a good summary article of the trouble Trump has over the documents. Here's one quote:

 

'In sum, Trump is in heap of trouble. “The chilling reality is setting in,” constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe tells me. "In seeking this search warrant, the government had obviously exhausted every less intrusive way of protecting national defense information and other extremely sensitive top-secret material from those who illegally removed it to Mar-a-Lago, lied to government agencies about its being there, and kept it there for reasons that cannot have been entirely innocent and might have been unimaginably dangerous to our nation.” '

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/26/fbi-affidavit-trump-search-takeaways/

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant wait to hear the list of charges coming out of this ..

 

Dont a number of Republican states still enact the death penalty for what they consider to be serious crimes, like treason or being black?

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about the death penalty bit but I wouldn't wish that on anyone.

 

I think the orange one has a heap of problems because as I understand it, removing any document after you leave presidential office is outside the rules. Mike Pence has made a point of saying that he gave back every single document under the rules.

 

I forget about the legality of it but I don't think a document even has be classified to get you into trouble if you removed it from the White House and kept it.

 

And it seems that Trump and his team may not have told everything to the Justice department about what documents they had where at Mar a Lago. They even found very sensitive documents in Trump's office there, in desk drawers.

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

I don't know about the death penalty bit but I wouldn't wish that on anyone.

 

 

He supported those punishments .. I don't.

 

14 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

 

I think the orange one has a heap of problems because as I understand it, removing any document after you leave presidential office is outside the rules. Mike Pence has made a point of saying that he gave back every single document under the rules.

 

I forget about the legality of it but I don't think a document even has be classified to get you into trouble if you removed it from the White House and kept it.

 

And it seems that Trump and his team may not have told everything to the Justice department about what documents they had where at Mar a Lago. They even found very sensitive documents in Trump's office there, in desk drawers.

 

 

They reportedly found the trump passports in a box with classified documents that apparently referred to deep cover operatives.

Which is apparently the real reason  they were 'confiscated' -  the box they were in was confiscated..

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/08/2022 at 13:59, theoldrouge said:

And of course Ms Palin is making a comeback supported by Donald

A run for VP with Trump?

Now there’s a thought 🤣

 

 

LOL

Alaska turns to Democrats after 50 years republican

Trump endorsed and supported Palin is out.

 

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Mary Peltola’s victory delivers blow to Palin’s hopes of political comeback and prompts concern for Republicans in November midterms

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be a huge problem for Trump. A document about a foreign power's nuclear capability was at Mar a Lago.

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Recovered records include material even senior Biden officials were not authorized to view, Washington Post reports

 

  • I agree 2

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the Daily Mail comments page and some of the Trump supporters say that he was entitled to have possession of the documents.   And there are apparently legal precedents that mean that Trump could not be charged with offences.  But then I have heard many legal experts in the US say that Trump can be prosecuted.

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope - no legal precedents that an ex president should have those documents that I am aware of - in fact what i've seen quite clearly declares the opposite and that they MUST be returned.

 

But then, you were just posting fanboy opinions vs actual legal opinions ('Trump supporters in the Mail) again weren't you?

 

Why the heck do you think Trump struggled to get a legal team after he dumped the ones (fact) telling him he needed a deal (alleged) ?

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's been a lot on this in the Washington Post and also the New York Times.

 

There are questions over whether executive privilege exists once you're no longer president - many people think it doesn't. My understanding is that no documents can be removed. There are laws that cover this I believe they apply to any document, not just classified or secret ones.

 

Mike Pence made a point of saying that he had returned every document to the appropriate people and had left with nothing that belonged to the people and therefore the Archives.

 

Trump may have declassified some documents but there's a procedure for doing this before papers leave the White House and Trump didn't follow it. What he did seems to count as scribbles.

 

It sounds like chaos at the end of his tenure because maybe he didn't believe he was leaving the WH and it was all done in a rush. But I don't understand why he would want to have papers at Mar a Lago and why he'd want to keep them in the first place. He doesn't seem to have bothered at all about their security.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...